Thornton Ruth D, Nurse Nicole, Snavely Laura, Hackett-Zahler Stacey, Frank Kenice, DiTomasso Robert A
Department of Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4170 City Ave., Philadelphia, PA, 19131, USA.
North Philadelphia Health System/St. Joseph's Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 19;17(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2307-z.
Knowledge of ambulatory patients' satisfaction with clinic visits help improve communication and delivery of healthcare. The goal was to examine patient satisfaction in a primary care setting, identify how selected patient and physician setting and characteristics affected satisfaction, and determine if feedback provided to medical directors over time impacted patient satisfaction.
A three-phase, semi-quantitative analysis was performed using anonymous, validated patient satisfaction surveys collected from 889 ambulatory outpatients in 6 healthcare centers over 5-years. Patients' responses to 21 questions were analyzed by principal components varimax rotated factor analysis. Three classifiable components emerged: Satisfaction with Physician, Availability/Convenience, and Orderly/Time. To study the effects of several independent variables (location of clinics, patients' and physicians' age, education level and duration at the clinic), data were subjected to multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA)..
Changes in the healthcare centers over time were not significantly related to patient satisfaction. However, location of the center did affect satisfaction. Urban patients were more satisfied with their physicians than rural, and inner city patients were less satisfied than urban or rural on Availability/Convenience and less satisfied than urban patients on Orderly/Time. How long a patient attended a center most affected satisfaction, with patients attending >10 years more satisfied in all three components than those attending <1-5 years. Level of education affected patients' satisfaction only in the component Orderly/Time; patients without a high school education were significantly less satisfied than those with more. Patients in their 40's were significantly less satisfied in Availability/Convenience than those >60 years old. Patients were significantly more satisfied with their 30-40 year-old physicians compared with those over 60. On Orderly/Time, patients were more satisfied with physicians who were in their 50's than physicians >60.
Improvement in patient satisfaction includes a need for immediate, specific feedback. Although Medical Directors received feedback yearly, we found no significant changes in patient satisfaction over time. Our results suggest that, to increase satisfaction, patients with lower education, those who are sicker, and those who are new to the center likely would benefit from additional high quality interactions with their physicians.
了解门诊患者对就诊的满意度有助于改善医疗保健中的沟通与服务。目标是在初级保健环境中检查患者满意度,确定选定的患者和医生的环境及特征如何影响满意度,并确定随着时间推移提供给医疗主任的反馈是否会影响患者满意度。
采用三阶段半定量分析方法,使用从6个医疗中心的889名门诊患者在5年期间收集的匿名且经验证有效的患者满意度调查问卷。通过主成分方差最大旋转因子分析来分析患者对21个问题的回答。出现了三个可分类的成分:对医生的满意度、可及性/便利性以及有序性/时间性。为了研究几个独立变量(诊所位置、患者和医生的年龄、教育水平以及在诊所的就诊时长)的影响,对数据进行多变量方差分析(MANOVA)。
随着时间推移,医疗中心的变化与患者满意度无显著相关性。然而,中心的位置确实会影响满意度。城市患者对医生的满意度高于农村患者,市中心患者在可及性/便利性方面比城市或农村患者满意度低,在有序性/时间性方面比城市患者满意度低。患者在一个中心就诊的时间长度对满意度影响最大,就诊超过10年的患者在所有三个成分上的满意度都高于就诊1 - 5年以下的患者。教育水平仅在有序性/时间性成分中影响患者满意度;未接受高中教育的患者比受教育程度更高的患者满意度显著更低。40多岁的患者在可及性/便利性方面比60岁以上的患者满意度显著更低。与60岁以上的医生相比,患者对30 - 40岁的医生满意度显著更高。在有序性/时间性方面,患者对50多岁的医生比对60岁以上的医生满意度更高。
提高患者满意度需要即时、具体的反馈。尽管医疗主任每年都会收到反馈,但我们发现患者满意度随时间没有显著变化。我们的结果表明,为了提高满意度,教育程度较低、病情较重以及新到中心的患者可能会从与医生更多高质量的互动中受益。