Rodriguez Hector P, Rogers William H, Marshall Richard E, Safran Dana Gelb
Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box 345, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):787-93. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0182-8. Epub 2007 Apr 13.
Visit continuity is important to patients and valued by physicians. However, it is virtually impossible for primary care physicians (PCPs) to provide care during every paneled patient visit. It remains unclear whether PCP visit discontinuity can be planned in a way that is least disruptive to patients' experiences with care.
This study aims to clarify whether visit continuity affects patients' experiences with primary care equally for all patients.
From January 2004 through March 2005, a large multispecialty practice in Massachusetts administered the Ambulatory Care Experience Survey (ACES) monthly to a random sample of patients visiting each of 145 PCPs. The analytic sample includes 14,835 patients with 2 or more primary care visits over the 6 months before being surveyed. Usual Provider Continuity (UPC), an administratively based measure of PCP visit continuity, was calculated for all respondents. Multilevel regression models that accounted for the clustering of patients within physicians modeled the relationship between UPC and each ACES measure. Interaction effects between UPC and gender, education, self-rated health, and PCP-patient relationship duration were tested.
Physician-patient interaction quality, including physician communication, knowledge of the patient, health promotion support, and organizational access were more strongly influenced by visit continuity among respondents in early stages of a PCP-patient relationship (P < 0.01) and with worse self-rated health (P < 0.01).
Improvements in physician-patient relationship quality can be achieved by targeting visit continuity improvement efforts to patients who benefit most, particularly those in early stages of a PCP-patient relationship and/or perceive their health as poor.
就诊连续性对患者很重要,且为医生所重视。然而,初级保健医生(PCP)几乎不可能在每次安排的患者就诊时都提供诊疗服务。目前尚不清楚PCP就诊中断是否可以以对患者就医体验干扰最小的方式进行规划。
本研究旨在阐明就诊连续性对所有患者的初级保健体验影响是否相同。
从2004年1月至2005年3月,马萨诸塞州的一家大型多专科诊所每月对随机抽取的就诊于145名PCP的患者进行门诊护理体验调查(ACES)。分析样本包括在接受调查前6个月内有2次或更多次初级保健就诊的14835名患者。为所有受访者计算了基于管理的PCP就诊连续性指标——通常提供者连续性(UPC)。考虑到医生内部患者聚集情况的多水平回归模型模拟了UPC与每个ACES指标之间的关系。测试了UPC与性别、教育程度、自评健康状况以及PCP - 患者关系持续时间之间的交互作用。
医患互动质量,包括医生沟通、对患者的了解、健康促进支持和组织可及性,在PCP - 患者关系早期阶段的受访者(P < 0.01)以及自评健康状况较差的受访者中(P < 0.01),受就诊连续性的影响更强。
通过将改善就诊连续性的努力针对受益最大的患者,特别是那些处于PCP - 患者关系早期阶段和/或认为自己健康状况较差的患者,可以实现医患关系质量的提升。