Suppr超能文献

南方古猿源泉种与人类的出现:来自幼年模式标本MH 1颅骨的可疑证据。

Australopithecus sediba and the emergence of Homo: Questionable evidence from the cranium of the juvenile holotype MH 1.

作者信息

Kimbel William H, Rak Yoel

机构信息

Institute of Human Origins and School of Human Evolution and Social Change, PO Box 874101, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4101, USA.

Institute of Human Origins and School of Human Evolution and Social Change, PO Box 874101, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4101, USA; Dept. of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2017 Jun;107:94-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 May 4.

Abstract

Malapa Hominin (MH) 1, an immature individual whose second permanent molars had recently reached occlusion at the time of death, is the holotype of Australopithecus sediba, a 2-myr-old South African taxon that has been hypothesized to link phylogenetically australopith-grade hominins to the Homo clade. Given the existence of 2.8 myr-old fossils of Homo in eastern Africa, this hypothesis implies a ghost lineage spanning at least 800 kyr. An alternative hypothesis posits a unique relationship between A. sediba and Australopithecus africanus, which predates the Malapa hominins in southern Africa and whose phylogenetic relationships remain ambiguous. The craniofacial morphology of MH 1 looms large in the framing of the two hypotheses. We evaluated these alternatives in two ways. First, we investigated whether the craniofacial morphology of MH 1 was ontogenetically stable at death. Based on data from a late-growth series of chimpanzee, gorilla, and modern human crania, we found that key aspects of MH 1's resemblance to Homo can be accounted for by its immaturity. Second, we studied MH 1 with an eye to identifying craniofacial synapomorphies shared with A. africanus. In this case, MH 1 shows unambiguous affinities in its zygomaticomaxillary and supraorbital morphology to crania from Sterkfontein Member 4, which we found to exhibit unusual derived morphology compared to Homo and other australopiths. We argue that MH 1 provides clear evidence that A. sediba was uniquely related to A. africanus and that the hypothesis of an extensive ghost lineage connecting A. sediba to the root of the Homo clade is unwarranted.

摘要

马拉帕古人类(MH)1是一名未成年个体,其第二恒磨牙在死亡时刚刚萌出。它是南方古猿源泉种的正模标本,这是一个距今200万年的南非类群,有人假设它在系统发育上把南方古猿级别的古人类与智人分支联系起来。鉴于东非存在距今280万年的智人化石,这一假设意味着至少有80万年的幽灵世系。另一种假设认为南方古猿源泉种与南方古猿非洲种之间存在独特关系,后者在南非早于马拉帕古人类出现,其系统发育关系仍不明确。MH 1的颅面形态在这两种假设的形成过程中具有重要影响。我们通过两种方式评估了这些假设。首先,我们研究了MH 1的颅面形态在死亡时是否在个体发育上稳定。基于黑猩猩、大猩猩和现代人类颅骨晚期生长系列的数据,我们发现MH 1与智人相似的关键方面可以用其未成熟来解释。其次,我们研究MH 1,以确定与南方古猿非洲种共有的颅面共有衍征。在这种情况下,MH 1在颧骨上颌和眶上形态上与斯泰克方丹4号成员的颅骨有明确的亲缘关系,我们发现这些颅骨与智人和其他南方古猿相比呈现出不寻常的衍生形态。我们认为MH 1提供了明确的证据,表明南方古猿源泉种与南方古猿非洲种有独特关系,而将南方古猿源泉种与智人分支根部连接起来的广泛幽灵世系的假设是没有根据的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验