Fink Tobias, Rensing Hauke, Volk Thomas, Huhn Ragnar, Mathes Alexander M
Saarland University Hospital, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Department of Anesthesiology, Homburg, Alemanha.
Leopoldina Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Schweinfurt, Alemanha.
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 Nov-Dec;67(6):571-577. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 May 16.
Regular postanesthesia visits allow the detection of anesthesia related complications and increase patient satisfaction. Consequently, the performance of postanesthesia visits has been recommended after certain types of anesthesia. However, no data is available concerning the current practice of postanesthesia visits. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate quantity, organization, contents, significance and problems of postanesthesia visits in Germany.
For this prospective closed-design survey, a questionnaire, consisting of 13 questions, was designed and tested for objectivity, reliability and validity. Subsequently, 3955 registered anesthesiologists were contacted via email to answer this survey.
Return rate was 31.4%; 958 questionnaires were included in the study. Only a small portion of patients was estimated to receive a postanesthesia visit (median: 20.0%). In hospitals with a specific postanesthesia visit service, this number was significantly higher (median: 65.0%, p<0.001) vs. no postanesthesia visit service. Postanesthesia visits usually lasted less than 5minutes (60.0%), and were typically conducted on the day of surgery (48.0%), after regular working hours (55.0%). 38.0% of the respondents reported to detect perioperative complications intermittently during their visits. While 98.0% of all respondents believe that postanesthesia visits improve the quality of their own work, 86.0% of the participants complain a lack of time for this task.
Our survey indicates that current working conditions prevent a regular postanesthesia visit routine. Considering the high appreciation of postanesthesia visits by anesthesiologists, as well as the relevant incidence of postoperative complications detected during these visits, it seems desirable to consider organizational improvements for postanesthesia care.
定期的麻醉后访视有助于发现与麻醉相关的并发症并提高患者满意度。因此,在某些类型的麻醉后,建议进行麻醉后访视。然而,目前尚无关于麻醉后访视当前实践情况的数据。因此,本研究旨在调查德国麻醉后访视的数量、组织、内容、意义及问题。
对于这项前瞻性封闭式设计调查,设计了一份包含13个问题的问卷,并对其客观性、可靠性和有效性进行了测试。随后,通过电子邮件联系了3955名注册麻醉医师以回答该调查。
回复率为31.4%;958份问卷纳入研究。据估计,只有一小部分患者接受了麻醉后访视(中位数:20.0%)。在设有专门麻醉后访视服务的医院,这一数字显著更高(中位数:65.0%,p<0.001),而在没有麻醉后访视服务的医院则较低。麻醉后访视通常持续不到5分钟(60.0%),且通常在手术当天进行(48.0%),在正常工作时间之后(55.0%)。38.0%的受访者报告在访视期间间歇性地发现围手术期并发症。虽然98.0%的受访者认为麻醉后访视提高了他们自己的工作质量,但86.0%的参与者抱怨没有时间进行这项工作。
我们的调查表明,当前的工作条件阻碍了麻醉后访视的常规开展。考虑到麻醉医师对麻醉后访视的高度认可,以及在这些访视期间发现的术后并发症的相关发生率,似乎有必要考虑对麻醉后护理进行组织改进。