Goth Anjum, Karim Habib Md R, Yunus Mohd, Chakraborty Raunaq, Dey Samarjit, Bhattacharyya Prithwis
Anesthesiology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-On-Tees, GBR.
Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Feb 1;15(2):e34518. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34518. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Background Continuity of personal care by the anesthesiologist is crucial for patient satisfaction. Over and above the consultation and service in the preoperative area, intraoperative care, and post-anesthesia care unit, anesthesia services frequently incorporate a pre-anesthesia evaluation clinic and a preoperative visit in the inpatient ward for their services, which helps with rapport building. However, routine post-anesthesia visits in the inpatient ward by the anesthesiologist are infrequent, causing a break in the continuity of care. The effect of such a routine post-operative visit by anesthesiologists has been tested only rarely in the Indian population. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of a single postoperative visit by the same anesthesiologist (continuity of care) on patient satisfaction and compare it with a postoperative visit by another anesthesiologist and no postoperative visit. Methods After institutional ethical committee approval, 276 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) I and II, consenting, elective surgical inpatients older than 16 years were enrolled in a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2015- September 2016. Consecutive patients were allocated into three groups based on the postoperative visit (i.e., group A: by the same anesthesiologist; group B: another anesthesiologist; and group C: no visit). Data related to patients' satisfaction were collected in a pretested questionnaire. Chi-Square and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were applied to analyze the data and compare among the groups; a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The mean age of the entire cohort was 38.1 years, comprising 39.9% men. Demographic, socioeconomic, and educational statuses were similar in all groups (p >0.05). The percentages of patient satisfaction were 61.47%, 51.52%, and 38.5% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (p=0.0001). Satisfaction with the fulfillment of "continuity of personal care" was the highest for group A (69.35%), which was significantly higher than group B (43.69%) and group C (35.65%). Group C had the lowest fulfillment of patient expectations and was significantly less satisfied than even group B (p=0.02). Conclusion Continuity of anesthesia care with the addition of routine postoperative visits had the highest positive impact on patient satisfaction. Even a single postoperative visit by the anesthesiologist significantly increased the patients' satisfaction.
麻醉医生提供的个性化护理的连续性对患者满意度至关重要。除了术前区域的会诊和服务、术中护理以及麻醉后护理单元外,麻醉服务通常还包括麻醉前评估门诊和在住院病房的术前访视,这有助于建立良好关系。然而,麻醉医生在住院病房进行常规的麻醉后访视并不常见,导致护理连续性中断。在印度人群中,很少对麻醉医生进行这种常规术后访视的效果进行测试。本研究旨在评估同一位麻醉医生进行的单次术后访视(护理连续性)对患者满意度的影响,并将其与另一位麻醉医生进行的术后访视以及无术后访视进行比较。
在获得机构伦理委员会批准后,2015年1月至2016年9月期间,在一家三级护理教学医院招募了276名美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA PS)I级和II级、同意参与的16岁以上择期手术住院患者。根据术后访视情况将连续患者分为三组(即A组:由同一位麻醉医生进行访视;B组:由另一位麻醉医生进行访视;C组:无访视)。通过预先测试的问卷收集与患者满意度相关的数据。应用卡方检验和方差分析(ANOVA)来分析数据并在组间进行比较;p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
整个队列的平均年龄为38.1岁,男性占39.9%。所有组的人口统计学、社会经济和教育状况相似(p>0.05)。A组、B组和C组的患者满意度分别为61.47%、51.52%和38.5%(p=0.0001)。A组对“个性化护理连续性”实现情况的满意度最高(69.35%),显著高于B组(43.69%)和C组(35.65%)。C组患者期望的实现程度最低,甚至比B组更不满意(p=0.02)。
增加常规术后访视的麻醉护理连续性对患者满意度有最高的积极影响。即使麻醉医生进行单次术后访视也能显著提高患者满意度。