Lino-Silva Leonardo S, Salcedo-Hernández Rosa A, España-Ferrufino Alejandro, Ruiz-García Erika B, Ruiz-Campos Miguel, León-Takahashi Alberto M, Meneses-García Abelardo
Department of Gastrointestinal Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Hum Pathol. 2017 Jul;65:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.03.027. Epub 2017 May 16.
Perineural invasion (PNI) is widely studied in malignant tumors, and its prognostic significance is well demonstrated in the head and neck and prostate carcinomas, but its significance in rectal cancer is controversial. Most studies have focused on evaluating mural PNI (mPNI); however, extramural PNI (ePNI) may influence the prognosis after rectal cancer resection. We evaluated the prognostic value of ePNI compared with mPNI and with non-PNI, in rectal resections after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in 148 patients with pT3 and pT4 rectal carcinomas. PNI was identified in 35 patients (23.6%), 60% of which were in the mPNI group. Factors associated with PNI were tumor invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, and venous invasion; patients with PNI were more likely to have positive resection margins (65.7% versus 11.6%). ePNI, compared with mPNI, was associated with female sex (64.3% versus 28.6%), positive surgical margins (42.8% versus 28.6%), recurrence (50% versus 28.6%), and death (92.9% versus 28.6%). The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 78.1% for patients without PNI, compared with 63.7% for the mPNI group and 26.4% for the ePNI group (P<.001). On multivariate analysis, the independent adverse prognostic factors were ePNI (odds ratio [OR], 22.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17.03-24.58; P<.001), overall recurrence (OR, 9.19; CI, 6.11-10.63; P=.002), clinical stage IV (OR, 8.56; CI, 6.34-9.47; P=.003), and positive surgical margin (OR, 3.95; CI, 2.00-4.28; P=.047). In conclusion, we demonstrated the prognostic effect of ePNI for disease-specific survival in surgically resected pT3-pT4 rectal cancer patients with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
神经周围浸润(PNI)在恶性肿瘤中得到广泛研究,其预后意义在头颈癌和前列腺癌中已得到充分证实,但在直肠癌中的意义仍存在争议。大多数研究集中于评估壁内神经周围浸润(mPNI);然而,壁外神经周围浸润(ePNI)可能影响直肠癌切除术后的预后。我们评估了148例pT3和pT4期直肠癌患者术前放化疗后行直肠切除术中,ePNI与mPNI及无PNI相比的预后价值。35例患者(23.6%)发现有PNI,其中60%在mPNI组。与PNI相关的因素有肿瘤浸润深度、淋巴结转移、淋巴管浸润和静脉浸润;有PNI的患者更可能有切缘阳性(65.7%对11.6%)。与mPNI相比,ePNI与女性(64.3%对28.6%)、手术切缘阳性(42.8%对28.6%)、复发(50%对28.6%)和死亡(92.9%对28.6%)相关。无PNI患者的5年疾病特异性生存率为78.1%,mPNI组为63.7%,ePNI组为26.4%(P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,独立的不良预后因素为ePNI(比值比[OR],22.17;95%置信区间[CI],17.03 - 24.58;P<0.001)、总体复发(OR,9.19;CI,6.11 - 10.63;P = 0.002)、临床IV期(OR,8.56;CI,6.34 - 9.47;P = 0.003)和手术切缘阳性(OR,3.95;CI,2.00 - 4.28;P = 0.047)。总之,我们证明了ePNI对术前放化疗后手术切除的pT3 - pT4期直肠癌患者疾病特异性生存的预后影响。