Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Institute of Applied Clinical Science, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Nov;36(11):2595-2600. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3642-5. Epub 2017 May 19.
The objective of the study was to measure patient attitudes and experience of information received during drug counselling for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) medications. This is a cross-sectional UK postal questionnaire study. Three RA patient groups-disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) only, first anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and failed anti-TNF-were sent postal questionnaires. Data on patient history/demographics, drug counselling experience, knowledge of drug side effects, attitudes to vaccinations, cancer screening and blood borne virus testing was collected; 264/679 (39%) patients responded (median age 65 years, 66% female, median disease duration 15 years). Drug information from rheumatology nurses, rheumatology doctors and information leaflets was most useful. Thirty-eight percent of respondents felt reassured by information received, but 37% felt more worried. Forty percent of participants were aware of important drug side effects. Although 42-65% of patients understood they should temporarily halt anti-TNF therapy with concurrent infection, 75% of patients recalled continuing therapy despite infection. Thirteen percent believed that all vaccinations (including travel vaccinations) were safe while taking anti-TNF. Uptake of UK cancer screening programmes was between 87 and 94%, except prostate screening (47%). Most participants were not aware that they may need to discontinue their anti-TNF if they developed cancer. The majority of participants felt neutral/reassured by the prospect of viral hepatitis (95%) and HIV (91%) testing. Although drug counselling is a well-established part of clinical care, there is potential for further improvement to ensure that patients' knowledge empowers them to act safely. Particular areas for improvement included the following: patients halting DMARDs/anti-TNF therapy during infections, knowledge regarding vaccinations and prostate cancer screening uptake.
本研究旨在衡量患者对类风湿关节炎(RA)药物治疗过程中所接受信息的态度和体验。这是一项英国的横断面邮寄问卷研究。将邮寄问卷发送给三组 RA 患者:仅使用疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)、首次使用抗肿瘤坏死因子(anti-TNF)和抗 TNF 治疗失败的患者。收集了患者病史/人口统计学资料、药物咨询经验、药物副作用知识、疫苗接种、癌症筛查和血液传播病毒检测的态度等数据;679 名患者中有 264 名(39%)做出回应(中位年龄 65 岁,66%为女性,中位病程 15 年)。患者认为来自风湿病护士、风湿病医生和信息传单的药物信息最有用。38%的受访者对所获得的信息感到安心,但 37%的人感到更担忧。40%的参与者了解重要的药物副作用。尽管 42-65%的患者知道在并发感染时应暂时停止抗 TNF 治疗,但 75%的患者在感染时仍继续接受治疗。13%的患者认为所有疫苗(包括旅行疫苗)在使用抗 TNF 时都是安全的。除了前列腺筛查(47%),英国癌症筛查计划的参与率在 87%至 94%之间。大多数参与者不知道如果他们患上癌症,可能需要停止使用抗 TNF。大多数参与者对进行病毒性肝炎(95%)和 HIV(91%)检测的前景感到中立/安心。尽管药物咨询是临床护理的一个成熟部分,但仍有进一步改进的空间,以确保患者的知识使他们能够安全行事。需要改进的具体领域包括:患者在感染期间停止使用 DMARDs/抗 TNF 治疗、疫苗接种和前列腺癌筛查的知识。