Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jul;100(7):5479-5490. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11811. Epub 2017 May 17.
Genomic selection may accelerate genetic progress in breeding programs of indicine breeds when compared with traditional selection methods. We present results of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle of Brazil for milk yield (MY), fat yield (FY), protein yield (PY), and age at first calving using information from bulls and cows. Four different single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips were studied. Additionally, the effect of the use of imputed data on genomic prediction accuracy was studied. A total of 474 bulls and 1,688 cows were genotyped with the Illumina BovineHD (HD; San Diego, CA) and BovineSNP50 (50K) chip, respectively. Genotypes of cows were imputed to HD using FImpute v2.2. After quality check of data, 496,606 markers remained. The HD markers present on the GeneSeek SGGP-20Ki (15,727; Lincoln, NE), 50K (22,152), and GeneSeek GGP-75Ki (65,018) were subset and used to assess the effect of lower SNP density on accuracy of prediction. Deregressed breeding values were used as pseudophenotypes for model training. Data were split into reference and validation to mimic a forward prediction scheme. The reference population consisted of animals whose birth year was ≤2004 and consisted of either only bulls (TR1) or a combination of bulls and dams (TR2), whereas the validation set consisted of younger bulls (born after 2004). Genomic BLUP was used to estimate genomic breeding values (GEBV) and reliability of GEBV (R) was based on the prediction error variance approach. Reliability of GEBV ranged from ∼0.46 (FY and PY) to 0.56 (MY) with TR1 and from 0.51 (PY) to 0.65 (MY) with TR2. When averaged across all traits, R were substantially higher (R of TR1 = 0.50 and TR2 = 0.57) compared with reliabilities of parent averages (0.35) computed from pedigree data and based on diagonals of the coefficient matrix (prediction error variance approach). Reliability was similar for all the 4 marker panels using either TR1 or TR2, except that imputed HD cow data set led to an inflation of reliability. Reliability of GEBV could be increased by enlarging the limited bull reference population with cow information. A reduced panel of ∼15K markers resulted in reliabilities similar to using HD markers. Reliability of GEBV could be increased by enlarging the limited bull reference population with cow information.
与传统选择方法相比,基因组选择可能会加速印度牛品种的育种计划中的遗传进展。我们展示了巴西吉尔(Bos indicus)奶牛的基因组预测结果,用于牛奶产量(MY)、脂肪产量(FY)、蛋白质产量(PY)和初配年龄,使用了公牛和母牛的数据。研究了四种不同的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)芯片。此外,还研究了使用估算数据对基因组预测准确性的影响。共有 474 头公牛和 1688 头母牛分别使用 Illumina BovineHD(HD;圣地亚哥,CA)和 BovineSNP50(50K)芯片进行了基因分型。使用 FImpute v2.2 将母牛的基因型估算为 HD。在对数据进行质量检查后,留下了 496606 个标记。HD 标记存在于 GeneSeek SGGP-20Ki(15727;Lincoln,NE)、50K(22152)和 GeneSeek GGP-75Ki(65018)上,这些标记被选作子集,用于评估 SNP 密度较低对预测准确性的影响。去回归的育种值被用作模型训练的伪表型。数据被分为参考和验证,以模拟正向预测方案。参考群体由出生年份≤2004 的动物组成,仅由公牛(TR1)或公牛和母畜(TR2)的组合组成,而验证组由较年轻的公牛(出生于 2004 年后)组成。基因组 BLUP 用于估计基因组育种值(GEBV),GEBV 的可靠性(R)是基于预测误差方差方法。GEBV 的可靠性范围从 FY 和 PY 的约 0.46 到 MY 的 0.56(TR1)和从 PY 的 0.51 到 MY 的 0.65(TR2)。当平均所有性状时,R 显著高于基于系谱数据和基于系数矩阵对角线(预测误差方差方法)计算的亲本平均值(0.35)。使用 TR1 或 TR2 时,所有 4 个标记面板的可靠性相似,除了使用 HD 牛数据集估算会导致可靠性膨胀。使用 TR1 或 TR2 时,所有 4 个标记面板的可靠性相似,除了使用 HD 牛数据集估算会导致可靠性膨胀。使用 TR1 或 TR2 时,所有 4 个标记面板的可靠性相似,除了使用 HD 牛数据集估算会导致可靠性膨胀。