Suppr超能文献

四种评分系统对原发性干燥综合征患者的诊断价值比较

Comparison of the diagnostic value of four scoring systems in primary sjögren's syndrome patients.

作者信息

Qi Xuan, Sun Chao, Tian Yu, Han Yuxiang, Peng Chenxing, Jin Hongtao, Gao Lixia, Guo Huifang

机构信息

Department of Rheumatism and immunology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, China.

Department of Rheumatism and immunology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, China.

出版信息

Immunol Lett. 2017 Aug;188:9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We attempted to evaluate the diagnostic value of different salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) scoring systems for primary sjögren's syndrome (pSS).

METHODS

Total 134 patients with pSS and 109 non-SS sicca controls were included in our study. All the cases were evaluated by four scoring systems (such as 0-16 SGUS, 0-3 SGUS, Parotid glands and Submandibular salivary glands scoring system). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for the four scoring systems.

RESULTS

The mean scores of pSS patients were significantly higher than that of controls by four scoring systems (P<0.01). The AUC (area under the curve) of (0-16) SGUS scoring system (0.916) was higher than Submandibular salivary glands scoring system (0.885) (P=0.016). No significant difference of AUC was observed in (0-3) SGUS scoring system, compared with 0-16, parotid gland and submandibular salivary glands scoring system. The optimal cutoff value of (0-16) SGUS, (0-3) SGUS, Parotid gland, Submandibular salivary glands scoring system was 5, 2, 3, 2, respectively. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity of the four scoring systems.

CONCLUSION

The simplified parotid gland scoring system may be the simplified and feasible method for pSS diagnosis.

摘要

目的

我们试图评估不同的唾液腺超声检查(SGUS)评分系统对原发性干燥综合征(pSS)的诊断价值。

方法

本研究纳入了134例pSS患者和109例非干燥综合征口干对照者。所有病例均采用四种评分系统(如0 - 16 SGUS、0 - 3 SGUS、腮腺和颌下唾液腺评分系统)进行评估。对这四种评分系统进行了受试者操作特征(ROC)分析。

结果

四种评分系统显示,pSS患者的平均得分均显著高于对照组(P<0.01)。(0 - 16)SGUS评分系统的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.916)高于颌下唾液腺评分系统(0.885)(P = 0.016)。(0 - 3)SGUS评分系统与0 - 16、腮腺和颌下唾液腺评分系统相比,AUC无显著差异。(0 - 16)SGUS、(0 - 3)SGUS、腮腺、颌下唾液腺评分系统的最佳截断值分别为5、2、3、2。四种评分系统的敏感性和特异性无显著差异。

结论

简化的腮腺评分系统可能是一种用于pSS诊断的简单可行的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验