Weiss Bernhard G, Bertlich Mattis, Scheele Rebecka, Canis Martin, Jakob Mark, Sohns Jan M, Ihler Friedrich
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Aug;274(8):3001-3009. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4609-5. Epub 2017 May 20.
The aim of this study was the evaluation of three localizations for the implantation of a semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device after previous mastoid surgery. This is a retrospective review of electronic datasets of cranial computed tomography studies. The study setting is one tertiary referral center and included 52 consecutive adult patients (60 temporal bones) with a history of mastoid surgery. The intervention was virtual placement of the device with a planning software within the remaining mastoid as well as dorsal of the sigmoid sinus and caudal of the transverse sinus (retrosigmoidal localization) and dorsocranial of the parietomastoid suture and cranial of the transverse sinus (parietal localization). The main outcome measure included dimensions of the bone for the reception of implant and screws, relative localization of dura mater or sinus sigmoideus, distance to the cochlea, thickness of the epicranium and classification of implantation as possible or impossible. Implantation within the remaining mastoid was deemed possible in 35 mastoid bones (58.3%). The best-suited alternative localization was retrosigmoidal in 22 (42.3%) and parietal in 29 patients (55.8%). The mean distance from the implantation site to the cochlea was lowest with on average 41.2 ± 3.1 mm from within the remaining mastoid. The differences in distance from the cochlea to the alternative localizations were each statistically significant (p < 0.01, ANOVA/Bonferroni t test). The retrosigmoidal and parietal localizations are suitable alternative implantation sites. The application of spacers may prevent contact to the sinuses or dura. Preoperative CT-based planning is recommended in cases of previous mastoid surgery.
4 (case series).
本研究的目的是评估在既往乳突手术后植入半植入式经皮骨传导装置的三种定位方法。这是一项对头颅计算机断层扫描研究电子数据集的回顾性分析。研究地点为一家三级转诊中心,纳入了52例有乳突手术史的连续成年患者(60侧颞骨)。干预措施是使用规划软件在剩余乳突内、乙状窦后方和横窦下方(乙状窦后定位)以及顶乳突缝背侧和横窦上方(顶叶定位)虚拟放置该装置。主要观察指标包括用于容纳植入物和螺钉的骨的尺寸、硬脑膜或乙状窦的相对定位、到耳蜗的距离、头皮厚度以及植入的可行性分类。在35块乳突骨(58.3%)中,认为在剩余乳突内植入是可行的。最合适的替代定位是22例(42.3%)采用乙状窦后定位,29例(55.8%)采用顶叶定位。从植入部位到耳蜗的平均距离在剩余乳突内平均最低,为41.2±3.1毫米。从耳蜗到替代定位的距离差异均具有统计学意义(p<0.01,方差分析/邦费罗尼t检验)。乙状窦后和顶叶定位是合适的替代植入部位。使用间隔物可防止与窦或硬脑膜接触。对于既往有乳突手术史的病例,建议进行基于术前CT的规划。
4(病例系列)。