• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用嵌压式骨移植和骨水泥型Lubinus SP II柄进行翻修全髋关节置换术的3至18年随访:临床、影像学及生存率分析,并与文献进行比较

A 3- to 18-Year Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Impacted Bone Allografts and Cemented Lubinus SP II Stem. Clinical, Radiographic, and Survivorship Analysis With Comparison to the Literature.

作者信息

Stigbrand Hampus, Ullmark Gösta

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Länssjukhuset, Gävle, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/County Council of Gävleborg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2810-2814. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.012
PMID:28529108
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We present the first medium- to long-term follow-up of revision total hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting (IBG) combined with the matte and collared Lubinus SP II stem for cases of severe osteolysis and stem loosening.

METHODS

Sixty-nine femoral revisions were identified for 67 patients consecutively operated with revision femoral arthroplasty using IBG and a cemented Lubinus SP II stem. The mean age was 69 years (standard deviation, 9.9). We retrospectively analyzed 68 cases (1 was lost to follow-up). At the time of the revision surgery, all had substantial femoral bone loss. Fifteen of the revisions were performed due to deep infection. The patients were analyzed by clinical score and radiography.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 4 femoral components (6%) had been rerevised or assessed as failure. Of these 4, 3 were assessed as mechanical failure, and 1 for dislocation; none was for infection. Three cups (4%) had been revised for dislocation; 1 of these also had a stem exchange. Three cases (4%) had been reoperated for a periprosthetic fracture in distal femur without stem exchange. Radiologic results were excellent and the clinical Merle d'Aubignè-Postel score had improved from a mean of 12.2 preoperatively to 17.5 at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

IBG combined with the Lubinus SP II stem is safe and results in a low rate of periprosthetic fractures and dislocations. The medium- to long-term clinical result was excellent, with regeneration of living bone in the femur.

摘要

背景

我们首次对采用打压植骨(IBG)联合磨砂颈圈型Lubinus SP II柄治疗严重骨溶解和柄松动的翻修全髋关节置换术进行了中长期随访。

方法

连续67例患者接受了69次股骨翻修术,采用IBG和骨水泥固定的Lubinus SP II柄。平均年龄为69岁(标准差9.9)。我们回顾性分析了68例病例(1例失访)。翻修手术时,所有患者均存在严重的股骨骨质流失。15例翻修是由于深部感染。通过临床评分和影像学对患者进行分析。

结果

随访时,4个股骨组件(6%)进行了再次翻修或被评估为失败。其中4例中,3例被评估为机械性失败,1例为脱位;均非感染所致。3个髋臼杯(4%)因脱位进行了翻修;其中1例还进行了柄置换。有3例(4%)因股骨远端假体周围骨折进行了再次手术,但未更换柄。影像学结果良好,临床Merle d'Aubignè-Postel评分从术前平均12.2分提高到随访时的17.5分。

结论

IBG联合Lubinus SP II柄安全,假体周围骨折和脱位发生率低。中长期临床结果良好,股骨有新生骨形成。

相似文献

1
A 3- to 18-Year Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Impacted Bone Allografts and Cemented Lubinus SP II Stem. Clinical, Radiographic, and Survivorship Analysis With Comparison to the Literature.采用嵌压式骨移植和骨水泥型Lubinus SP II柄进行翻修全髋关节置换术的3至18年随访:临床、影像学及生存率分析,并与文献进行比较
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2810-2814. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
2
The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up.在接受全髋关节翻修术的严重股骨骨量丢失患者中使用股骨支撑物和打压植骨松质骨移植:3至9年随访
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Feb;94(2):167-72. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.27296.
3
A 2- to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup.使用新型髋臼假体联合打压植骨和骨水泥固定杯行翻修全髋关节置换术的 2-16 年临床随访。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):815-822. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.髋关节翻修术中的股骨嵌压植骨术:来自原发中心的705例病例
Bone Joint J. 2016 Dec;98-B(12):1611-1619. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.37414.
5
Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.初次使用骨水泥技术行全髋关节置换术股骨侧翻修,不使用植骨。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Jun;95(4):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
6
Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.股骨打压植骨术治疗髋关节翻修术中严重骨量丢失
Hip Int. 2017 May 12;27(3):281-285. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000438. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
Long-term Follow-up Results of Femoral Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Standard Cemented Polished Stem.使用打压植骨和标准固位抛光柄的股骨翻修髋关节置换术的长期随访结果。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Oct;15(5):734-739. doi: 10.4055/cios23052. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
8
Impaction bone grafting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty with Exeter stem in Japan: An extended 10- to 15-year stem survival analysis of the previously reported series.日本 Exeter 柄股骨翻修髋关节置换中嵌压植骨:对先前报道系列的延长 10-15 年柄生存率分析。
J Orthop Sci. 2024 Jan;29(1):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.12.009. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
9
Impacted corticocancellous allografts and cement for femoral revision of total hip arthroplasty using Lubinus and Charnley prostheses.使用卢比努斯(Lubinus)和查恩利(Charnley)假体进行全髋关节置换股骨翻修时的嵌压皮质骨松质骨同种异体骨及骨水泥。
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Apr;17(3):325-34. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.30782.
10
Cementless cups do not increase osteolysis risk in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Apropos of 106 cases.无骨水泥杯不会增加金属对金属全髋关节置换术后的骨溶解风险。附 106 例报告。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Nov;95(7):478-90. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival outcomes of hybrid total hip replacement following failed proximal femoral nail antirotation: a retrospective study with a median 10-year follow-up.股骨近端防旋髓内钉失败后行杂交全髋关节置换术的生存结果:一项中位随访10年的回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2025 May 13;12:1562738. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1562738. eCollection 2025.
2
Cemented uncemented stems for revision total hip replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于翻修全髋关节置换的骨水泥型与非骨水泥型股骨柄:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Orthop. 2023 Aug 18;14(8):630-640. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i8.630.
3
Satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach using primary femoral stems at 2-8 years of follow-up.
采用初次使用的股骨柄经直接前路进行翻修全髋关节置换术后,在2至8年的随访中获得了满意的临床和影像学结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6393-6402. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04838-6. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
4
Uncemented or cemented stems in first-time revision total hip replacement? An observational study of 867 patients including assessment of femoral bone defect size.初次全髋关节翻修中使用非骨水泥或骨水泥固定的假体?一项 867 例患者的观察性研究,包括股骨骨缺损大小的评估。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Apr;92(2):143-150. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1846956. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
5
A systematic review of the causes of failure of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节翻修术失败原因的系统评价
J Orthop. 2019 May 2;16(5):393-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.04.011. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.