• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换术后的晚期脱位:轴承是一个因素吗?

Late Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is the Bearing a Factor?

作者信息

Shah Siddharth M, Walter William L, Tai Stephen M, Lorimer Michelle F, de Steiger Richard N

机构信息

Specialist Orthopaedic Group, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Clinical Research, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2852-2856. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.037. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.037
PMID:28529109
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dislocation is a leading cause of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although more common in the first few years after the procedure, dislocation can occur at any time. This study investigated the difference in late dislocation in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings compared with metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in THA.

METHODS

Data were used from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, and the cumulative percent revision for dislocation was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for the different bearing surfaces. There were 192,275 THAs included in the study with 101,915 metal-on-cross-linked polyethylene (MoXLPE), 30,256 ceramic-on-cross-linked polyethylene (CoXLPE), and 60,104 CoC.

RESULTS

The cumulative percent revision for dislocation at 13 years for MoXLPE, CoXLPE, and CoC groups was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.3), 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-1.4), and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.8-1.1), respectively. There was an increased risk of revision for dislocation for MoXLPE compared with CoXLPE and CoC. When stratified for head size, there was no difference in the risk of revision for dislocation between MoXLPE, CoXLPE, and CoC in the 28- and 32-mm head sizes. With a head size of 36 mm, MoXLPE had a higher rate of dislocation compared with other materials.

CONCLUSION

Bearing surface has little impact on revision for dislocation.

摘要

背景

脱位是初次全髋关节置换术(THA)后翻修的主要原因。尽管在术后头几年更常见,但脱位可在任何时间发生。本研究调查了THA中陶瓷对陶瓷(CoC)轴承与金属对聚乙烯及陶瓷对聚乙烯轴承相比在晚期脱位方面的差异。

方法

使用澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的数据,采用Kaplan-Meier方法估算不同轴承表面脱位的累积翻修百分比。该研究纳入了192,275例THA,其中101,915例为金属对交联聚乙烯(MoXLPE),30,256例为陶瓷对交联聚乙烯(CoXLPE),60,104例为CoC。

结果

MoXLPE、CoXLPE和CoC组在13年时脱位的累积翻修百分比分别为1.2(95%置信区间[CI],1.1 - 1.3)、1.0(95% CI,0.7 - 1.4)和0.9(95% CI,0.8 - 1.1)。与CoXLPE和CoC相比,MoXLPE脱位翻修的风险增加。按股骨头大小分层时,在28毫米和32毫米股骨头大小的MoXLPE、CoXLPE和CoC之间,脱位翻修风险无差异。对于36毫米的股骨头大小,MoXLPE的脱位率高于其他材料。

结论

轴承表面对脱位翻修影响不大。

相似文献

1
Late Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is the Bearing a Factor?全髋关节置换术后的晚期脱位:轴承是一个因素吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2852-2856. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.037. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
2
Are ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty associated with reduced revision risk for late dislocation?全髋关节置换术中的陶瓷对陶瓷轴承与降低晚期脱位翻修风险相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3790-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4395-6.
3
Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术通过保留肌肉祖细胞,减少了脱位并减轻了肌肉退变。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3762-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4378-7.
4
Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?髋关节置换术中人工关节周围感染:感染与关节面类型之间存在关联吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2213-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4916-y.
5
Can Dual Mobility Cups Reduce Revision and Dislocation Risks? An Analysis of 107,528 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties in the United States.双动杯能降低翻修和脱位风险吗?对美国 107528 例初次全髋关节置换术的分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1279-1284.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.11.026. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
6
What Is the Risk of THA Revision for ARMD in Patients with Non-metal-on-metal Bearings? A Study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry.非金属对金属假体的 ARMD 患者行全髋关节翻修术的风险如何?来自澳大利亚国家关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jun;478(6):1244-1253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001277.
7
Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷关节翻修的原因与其他假体有差异吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x.
8
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.全髋关节置换术中不同轴承的结果——植入物存活率、翻修原因及患者报告的结果。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
9
Comparison of cementless total hip arthroplasty survivorship between metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic on ceramic bearings: A case control study with a 5-9-year follow-up.金属对超高交联聚乙烯与陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后生存率的比较:5-9 年随访的病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Sep;104(5):663-669. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
10
Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?在高度交联聚乙烯衬垫上,金属股骨头和陶瓷股骨头的翻修风险是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1349-1355. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4966-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceramic-on-ceramic metal-on-crosslink polyethylene in a fully hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty: Survivorship, complications and long-term results.全羟基磷灰石涂层全髋关节置换术中的陶瓷对陶瓷、金属对交联聚乙烯:生存率、并发症及长期结果
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Sep 30;57:102555. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102555. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
The influence of bearing surfaces on revisions due to dislocations in total hip arthroplasty.关节面对于全髋关节置换术后因脱位而导致翻修的影响。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021 Sep 15;32(9):123. doi: 10.1007/s10856-021-06598-4.
3
Dual-Mobility Cup Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: A Retrospective Study With a Median Follow-Up of 5 Years.
双动杯全髋关节置换术治疗移位型股骨颈骨折:一项中位随访5年的回顾性研究
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Apr 30;12:21514593211013244. doi: 10.1177/21514593211013244. eCollection 2021.
4
Minimum 15-year results of metasul 28-mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age.50 岁以下患者使用 metasul 28 毫米金属对金属全髋关节置换术的至少 15 年结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 25;16(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02352-2.
5
Anterior hip replacement: lower dislocation rates despite less restrictions?髋关节前置换术:脱位率降低,限制更少?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2413-2417. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03849-5. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Outcome of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty with 4th Generation 36 mm Head Compared to that with 3rd Generation 28 mm Head by Propensity Score Matching.通过倾向得分匹配比较第四代36毫米股骨头与第三代28毫米股骨头的陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术的结果。
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Sep 2;54(6):848-855. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00242-z. eCollection 2020 Nov.
7
Posterior approach, fracture diagnosis, and american society of anesthesiology class iii-iv are associated with increased risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 33,337 operations from the finnish arthroplasty register.后路入路、骨折诊断和美国麻醉医师协会分级 III-IV 与全髋关节置换术后脱位翻修的风险增加相关:来自芬兰关节置换登记处的 33337 例手术分析。
Scand J Surg. 2021 Sep;110(3):351-358. doi: 10.1177/1457496920930617. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
8
Survival and outcomes of different head sizes in primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中不同头大小的生存率及预后
J Orthop. 2019 Oct 9;16(6):A1-A3. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.10.001. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
9
Causes of and treatment options for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后脱位的原因及治疗选择
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):1715-1722. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7733. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
10
Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?带帽交联聚乙烯衬垫是否与 THA 翻修风险降低相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1315-1321. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000710.