初次全髋关节置换术中不同头大小的生存率及预后
Survival and outcomes of different head sizes in primary total hip arthroplasty.
作者信息
Shah Siddharth M
机构信息
S L Raheja (A Fortis Associate) hospital, Mahim West, Mumbai, India.
出版信息
J Orthop. 2019 Oct 9;16(6):A1-A3. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.10.001. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
Abstract
The femoral head size influences dislocation, range of motion (ROM), functional outcome, wear, and survival after total hip arthroplasty (THA). These aspects of different head sizes with contemporary bearings in primary THA have been reviewed. Based on the existing evidence, for highly-cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) bearings, a 32 mm cobalt chromium (CoCr) or ceramic head appears to be a suitable choice. If a 36 mm head with HXLPE is desired, a ceramic head may be preferable over CoCr due to reduced risk of fretting and corrosion with the former. For ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings, head sizes >36 mm do not appear to provide any significant benefit over 36 mm heads. Also, large ceramic heads may lead to increased risk of squeaking. If non-cross-linked PE bearing is considered for use, it would be prudent to opt for <32 mm head size.
摘要
股骨头大小会影响全髋关节置换术（THA）后的脱位、活动范围（ROM）、功能结果、磨损及假体生存率。本文回顾了初次THA中不同尺寸股骨头与当代关节轴承相关的这些方面。基于现有证据，对于高交联聚乙烯（HXLPE）轴承，32毫米钴铬（CoCr）或陶瓷股骨头似乎是合适的选择。如果需要使用36毫米的HXLPE股骨头，由于陶瓷股骨头的微动和腐蚀风险较低，可能比CoCr股骨头更可取。对于陶瓷对陶瓷（CoC）轴承，大于36毫米的股骨头尺寸似乎并不比36毫米的股骨头有任何显著优势。此外，大尺寸陶瓷股骨头可能会增加 squeaking 的风险。如果考虑使用非交联聚乙烯轴承，选择小于32毫米的股骨头尺寸较为谨慎。
相似文献
1
Survival and outcomes of different head sizes in primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中不同头大小的生存率及预后
J Orthop. 2019 Oct 9;16(6):A1-A3. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.10.001. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
2
Assessing Taper Geometry, Head Size, Head Material, and Their Interactions in Taper Fretting Corrosion of Retrieved Total Hip Arthroplasty Implants.评估锥形腐蚀中锥形几何形状、头部尺寸、头部材料及其相互作用在翻修全髋关节置换植入物中的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S386-S394.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.041. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
3
Ceramic Heads Decrease Metal Release Caused by Head-taper Fretting and Corrosion.陶瓷股骨头可减少因头颈锥度微动和腐蚀导致的金属释放。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):985-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4683-1. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
Is there any range-of-motion advantage to using bearings larger than 36mm in primary hip arthroplasty: A case-control study comparing 36-mm and large-diameter heads.在初次髋关节置换术中使用大于36毫米的股骨头假体在活动范围上是否具有优势：一项比较36毫米和大直径股骨头假体的病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Oct;102(6):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 13.
5
Low wear rates seen in THAs with highly crosslinked polyethylene at 9 to 14 years in patients younger than age 50 years.在年龄小于50岁的患者中，高度交联聚乙烯的全髋关节置换术在9至14年时磨损率较低。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3829-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4422-7.
6
Fifteen-Year Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty With Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years and Less.50 岁及以下患者钴铬合金股骨头在超交联聚乙烯上的全髋关节置换术 15 年结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.071. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中的头部尺寸
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 May 21;3(5):225-231. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170061. eCollection 2018 May.
8
Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?在高度交联聚乙烯衬垫上，金属股骨头和陶瓷股骨头的翻修风险是否存在差异？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1349-1355. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4966-1.
9
Outcomes of Ceramic Bearings After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Medicare Population.医疗保险人群初次全髋关节置换术后陶瓷轴承的疗效
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):743-749. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.038. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
Gender Differences in Wear Rates for 28- vs 32-mm Ceramic Femoral Heads on Modern Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene at Midterm Follow-Up in Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.在接受全髋关节置换术的年轻患者中期随访中，28毫米与32毫米陶瓷股骨头搭配现代高交联聚乙烯的磨损率的性别差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr;31(4):899-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.024. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
引用本文的文献
1
Using preoperative planning software to assess the effect of head length on prosthetic range of motion in a high-risk population: a three-dimensional modeling study.使用术前规划软件评估头长对高危人群假体活动范围的影响：三维建模研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Sep;48(9):2403-2410. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06191-8. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Risk factors for liner wear and head migration in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.髋关节置换术后髋臼内衬磨损和头迁移的危险因素：系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42809-4.
3
Low dislocation rates with the use of patient specific "Safe zones" in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中使用患者特异性“安全区”时脱位率较低。
J Orthop. 2021 Aug 21;27:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.08.009. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
本文引用的文献
1
Spinopelvic Motion and Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中的骨盆-脊柱运动与撞击
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S53-S56. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Femoral Head Penetration Rates of Second-Generation Sequentially Annealed Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene at Minimum Five Years.第二代序贯退火超高交联聚乙烯股骨头穿透率至少五年。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
3
Could larger diameter of 4th generation ceramic bearing increase the rate of squeaking after THA?: A retrospective study.第四代陶瓷轴承更大的直径会增加全髋关节置换术后的摩擦音发生率吗？一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(52):e13977. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013977.
4
Excellent results of large-diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty: Is Squeaking Related to Head Size.大直径陶瓷对陶瓷轴承在全髋关节置换术中的优异效果：异响与头尺寸有关吗？
Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1434-1441. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0532.R1.
5
Changes in spinopelvic indices after hip arthroplasty and its influence on acetabular component orientation.髋关节置换术后脊柱骨盆指数的变化及其对髋臼假体位置的影响。
J Orthop. 2017 Aug 1;14(4):434-437. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.07.018. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
Late Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is the Bearing a Factor?全髋关节置换术后的晚期脱位：轴承是一个因素吗？
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2852-2856. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.037. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
7
Characterization of Femoral Head Taper Corrosion Features Using a 22-Year Retrieval Database.利用一个22年的翻修数据库对股骨头锥度腐蚀特征进行表征。
HSS J. 2017 Feb;13(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s11420-016-9517-5. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
8
Is there any range-of-motion advantage to using bearings larger than 36mm in primary hip arthroplasty: A case-control study comparing 36-mm and large-diameter heads.在初次髋关节置换术中使用大于36毫米的股骨头假体在活动范围上是否具有优势：一项比较36毫米和大直径股骨头假体的病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Oct;102(6):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 13.
9
Ceramic Heads Decrease Metal Release Caused by Head-taper Fretting and Corrosion.陶瓷股骨头可减少因头颈锥度微动和腐蚀导致的金属释放。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):985-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4683-1. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
10
Gender Differences in Wear Rates for 28- vs 32-mm Ceramic Femoral Heads on Modern Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene at Midterm Follow-Up in Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.在接受全髋关节置换术的年轻患者中期随访中，28毫米与32毫米陶瓷股骨头搭配现代高交联聚乙烯的磨损率的性别差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr;31(4):899-905. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.024. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
Zotero 插件