• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

呼吁在中国进行共同决策:挑战与机遇。

Call for shared decision making in China: Challenges and opportunities.

作者信息

Yao Mi, Finnikin Samuel, Cheng K K

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China; Beijing Xicheng District Xinjiekou Community Health Service Center, Beijing, China.

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:32-35. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.004
PMID:28529119
Abstract

China's healthcare system has undergone extensive changes over recent years and the most recent reforms are designed to shift the emphasis away from hospital based services towards a more primary care based system. There is an increasing recognition that shared decision making needs to play a central role in the delivery of healthcare in China, but there are several significant barriers to overcome before this aspiration becomes a reality. Doctor-patient relationships in China are poor, consultations are often brief transactions and levels of trust are low. Implementing a shared decision making process developed in the Western World may be hampered by cultural differences, although this remains an under-researched area. There is, however, a suggestion that the academic community is starting to take an interest in encouraging shared decision making in practice and indications that the Chinese public may be willing to consider this new approach to healthcare.

摘要

近年来,中国的医疗体系发生了广泛变革,最新改革旨在将重点从以医院为基础的服务转向更以基层医疗为基础的体系。人们越来越认识到,共同决策需要在中国医疗服务的提供中发挥核心作用,但在这一愿望成为现实之前,有几个重大障碍需要克服。中国的医患关系不佳,诊疗过程往往是简短的事务性往来,信任度较低。尽管这仍是一个研究不足的领域,但在西方世界发展起来的共同决策过程的实施可能会受到文化差异的阻碍。然而,有迹象表明学术界开始对在实践中鼓励共同决策产生兴趣,也有迹象表明中国公众可能愿意考虑这种新的医疗保健方式。

相似文献

1
Call for shared decision making in China: Challenges and opportunities.呼吁在中国进行共同决策:挑战与机遇。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:32-35. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Shared decision making in West Africa: The forgotten area.西非的共同决策:被遗忘的领域。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 18.
3
Milestones, barriers and beacons: Shared decision making in Canada inches ahead.里程碑、障碍与指引:加拿大的共同决策正逐步推进。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 20.
4
The state of shared decision making in Malaysia.马来西亚的共同决策状态。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:66-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
Moving towards shared decision making in the physician-patient encounter in France: State of the art and future prospects.法国医患诊疗过程中迈向共同决策:现状与未来展望
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
The long way of implementing patient-centered care and shared decision making in Germany.在德国实施以患者为中心的护理和共同决策的漫长道路。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 22.
7
How contextual issues can distort shared decision making.背景因素如何扭曲共同决策。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016 Dec;118-119:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
Patients' need for information provision and perceived participation in decision making in doctor-patient consultation: Micro-cultural differences between French- and Italian-speaking Switzerland.患者在医患咨询中对信息提供的需求以及对参与决策的认知:瑞士法语区和意大利语区之间的微观文化差异
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):462-469. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
9
Implementing shared decision making in Denmark: First steps and future focus areas.在丹麦实施共同决策:初步措施及未来重点领域
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Jun;123-124:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 19.
10
Older patients and their GPs: shared decision making in enhancing trust.老年患者及其全科医生:增强信任中的共同决策
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Nov;64(628):e709-18. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682297.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining cancer patient preferences during three stages of decision making and family involvement: a multicenter survey study in China.在中国进行的一项多中心调查研究:考察癌症患者在三个决策阶段的偏好及家庭参与情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02846-z.
2
Shared decision-making implementation status among dermatologists engaging in medical esthetics: a cross-sectional study in China.从事医学美容的皮肤科医生共同决策的实施现状:一项中国的横断面研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 31;11:1418917. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1418917. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring shared decision-making needs in lung cancer screening among high-risk groups and health care providers in China: a qualitative study.
探索中国肺癌筛查高危人群和医疗服务提供者的共同决策需求:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 May 21;24(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12360-0.
4
Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Medication in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma in China: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.中国肾细胞癌患者对药物的偏好和支付意愿:一项离散选择实验。
Patient. 2024 Jan;17(1):97-108. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00659-2. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
5
Shared decision-making in healthcare in mainland China: a scoping review.中国大陆医疗卫生中的共享决策:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1162993. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1162993. eCollection 2023.
6
Communication Skills (CS) training of physicians in China and its role in actual challenges of patient-physician relationship: a cross-sectional survey.中国医师的沟通技巧(CS)培训及其在医患关系实际挑战中的作用:一项横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 12;22(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03830-9.
7
Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Medical Dissatisfaction Experiences in Chinese Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国医院医疗不满意体验的患病率及影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 3;15:523-532. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S290651. eCollection 2021.