• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

餐饮服务干预措施及其对成年肿瘤患者营养状况和满意度影响的系统评价与荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analyses of foodservice interventions and their effect on nutritional outcomes and satisfaction of adult oncology patients.

作者信息

Doyle Elizabeth, Simmance Natalie, Wilding Helen, Porter Judi

机构信息

Nutrition DepartmentSt Vincent's Hospital MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia.

Carl de Gruchy LibrarySt Vincent's Hospital MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia.

出版信息

Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;74(2):116-128. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12342. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12342
PMID:28529448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5412690/
Abstract

AIM

An understanding of effective foodservice interventions on nutrition outcomes in adult patients with cancer is required to support clinical decision making. This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of foodservice interventions across a range of nutritional outcomes and satisfaction of hospitalised and ambulatory adult oncology patients.

METHODS

The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016045772). Six databases were searched using search terms associated with the intervention and population. No date or language restrictions were applied. Authors applied the inclusion criteria to titles and abstracts and then full-text papers. The final library was assessed for risk of bias. Outcome data were combined narratively and, where possible, by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

From the title and abstract review of 4414 studies, 12 studies testing the effect of foodservice interventions were included in this review. Meta-analyses demonstrated significantly greater energy (mean difference 1.54 MJ/day; 95% CI 0.85-2.23 MJ/day) and protein (mean difference 18.98 g/day; 95% CI 11.58-26.39 g/day) intake through the addition of oral nutrition supplements. Other positive effects on anthropometric outcomes were also recorded. Patient satisfaction was enhanced through other foodservice interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited original research was found exploring the effect of foodservice interventions in oncology patients. Significant findings were found in favour of the intervention across a range of nutritional outcomes, suggesting that foodservice interventions may improve clinical outcomes and satisfaction in this population. Effective foodservice interventions for oncology patients remain under-researched, so we encourage dietitians and foodservice staff to implement rigorous study designs to evaluate and publish interventions in this clinical group.

摘要

目的

为支持临床决策,需要了解有效的餐饮服务干预措施对成年癌症患者营养状况的影响。本系统评价旨在确定餐饮服务干预措施对一系列营养指标以及住院和门诊成年肿瘤患者满意度的影响。

方法

该评价方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42016045772)登记。使用与干预措施和研究对象相关的检索词对六个数据库进行了检索。未设定日期或语言限制。作者先对标题和摘要应用纳入标准,然后对全文进行筛选。对最终纳入的文献进行偏倚风险评估。结果数据采用叙述性综合分析,并在可能的情况下进行荟萃分析。

结果

通过对4414项研究的标题和摘要进行筛选,本评价纳入了12项检验餐饮服务干预效果的研究。荟萃分析表明,通过添加口服营养补充剂,能量摄入量(平均差值1.54兆焦/天;95%置信区间0.85 - 2.23兆焦/天)和蛋白质摄入量(平均差值18.98克/天;95%置信区间11.58 - 26.39克/天)显著增加。还记录了对人体测量指标的其他积极影响。通过其他餐饮服务干预措施,患者满意度得到提高。

结论

发现探索餐饮服务干预措施对肿瘤患者影响的原始研究有限。在一系列营养指标方面发现了支持该干预措施的显著结果,表明餐饮服务干预措施可能改善该人群的临床结局和满意度。针对肿瘤患者的有效餐饮服务干预措施仍研究不足,因此我们鼓励营养师和餐饮服务人员采用严谨的研究设计来评估并发表针对该临床群体的干预措施研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad63/5412690/735de8ac44cb/NDI-74-116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad63/5412690/67e8bebed570/NDI-74-116-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad63/5412690/4e8ac7f68825/NDI-74-116-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad63/5412690/5b7f55568ccf/NDI-74-116-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad63/5412690/735de8ac44cb/NDI-74-116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad63/5412690/67e8bebed570/NDI-74-116-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad63/5412690/4e8ac7f68825/NDI-74-116-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad63/5412690/5b7f55568ccf/NDI-74-116-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad63/5412690/735de8ac44cb/NDI-74-116-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analyses of foodservice interventions and their effect on nutritional outcomes and satisfaction of adult oncology patients.餐饮服务干预措施及其对成年肿瘤患者营养状况和满意度影响的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;74(2):116-128. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12342. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
2
The effect of interventions to prevent and treat malnutrition in patients admitted for rehabilitation: a systematic review with meta-analysis.针对康复住院患者预防和治疗营养不良的干预措施效果:一项Meta分析的系统评价
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;28(1):1-15. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12230. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
4
Patient-Centered Foodservice Model Improves Body Weight, Nutritional Intake and Patient Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment.以患者为中心的餐饮服务模式可改善癌症患者的体重、营养摄入和患者满意度。
Nutr Cancer. 2019;71(3):418-423. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2018.1506490. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
6
The Currently Available Literature on Inpatient Foodservices: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.住院餐饮服务的现有文献:系统评价和批判性评价。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jul;119(7):1118-1141.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
Nutritional intake and foodservice satisfaction of adults receiving specialist inpatient mental health services.接受专科住院精神卫生服务的成年人的营养摄入和餐饮服务满意度。
Nutr Diet. 2022 Jul;79(3):411-418. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12745. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
8
Consumer expectation and responses to environmental sustainability initiatives and their impact in foodservice operations: A systematic review.消费者对环境可持续性举措的期望和反应及其对餐饮服务运营的影响:系统评价。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2021 Dec;34(6):994-1013. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12897. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
9
Comparison of foodservice management performance level between dietitians and non-dietitians in senior centers using IPA.利用 IPA 比较老年人活动中心营养师和非营养师的餐饮服务管理绩效水平。
Nutr Res Pract. 2009 Spring;3(1):49-55. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2009.3.1.49. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
10
A Study on the Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction with Institutional Foodservice during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间影响机构餐饮服务顾客满意度的因素研究
Foods. 2022 Apr 6;11(7):1053. doi: 10.3390/foods11071053.

引用本文的文献

1
Foodservice interventions and their influence on nutritional outcomes and satisfaction of adult oncology patients-a conceptual replication.餐饮服务干预及其对成年肿瘤患者营养状况和满意度的影响——一项概念性重复研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 24;33(3):217. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09264-5.
2
Examining the Benefits of Digitally Selectable Meals Called "À La Carte Digital-Select" in Cancer Chemotherapy Patients.研究名为“数字单点”的数字可选餐食对癌症化疗患者的益处。
Nutr Metab Insights. 2022 May 17;15:11786388221098507. doi: 10.1177/11786388221098507. eCollection 2022.
3
Lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial on a home delivered meal service in advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a pilot study.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of the cost and cost effectiveness of using standard oral nutritional supplements in the hospital setting.医院环境中使用标准口服营养补充剂的成本和成本效益的系统评价。
Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;35(2):370-380. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 29.
2
The effect of interventions to prevent and treat malnutrition in patients admitted for rehabilitation: a systematic review with meta-analysis.针对康复住院患者预防和治疗营养不良的干预措施效果:一项Meta分析的系统评价
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;28(1):1-15. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12230. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
Effects of an oral nutritional supplement containing eicosapentaenoic acid on nutritional and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: randomised trial.
从一项针对接受化疗的晚期癌症患者的家庭送餐服务随机对照试验中吸取的经验教训:一项试点研究。
BMC Nutr. 2021 Feb 16;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40795-021-00407-5.
含二十碳五烯酸的口服营养补充剂对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者营养和临床结局的影响:一项随机试验。
Clin Nutr. 2014 Dec;33(6):1017-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
4
Influence of a nutritional intervention on dietary intake and quality of life in cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.营养干预对癌症患者饮食摄入和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Nutrition. 2013 Nov-Dec;29(11-12):1342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2013.05.004.
5
Food caregivers influence on nutritional intake among admitted haematological cancer patients - a prospective study.食物照顾者对住院血液恶性肿瘤患者营养摄入的影响 - 一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
6
Addressing malnutrition in hospitalized adults.处理住院成人的营养不良问题。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013 Nov;37(6):808-15. doi: 10.1177/0148607113497224. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of high protein oral nutritional supplements.系统评价和高蛋白口服营养补充剂的影响的荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2012 Apr;11(2):278-96. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.12.008. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
8
Malnutrition and its impact on cost of hospitalization, length of stay, readmission and 3-year mortality.营养不良及其对住院费用、住院时间、再入院率和 3 年死亡率的影响。
Clin Nutr. 2012 Jun;31(3):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
9
Simple nutritional intervention in patients with advanced cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, non-small cell lung cancers or mesothelioma and weight loss receiving chemotherapy: a randomised controlled trial.营养干预对接受化疗的晚期胃肠道癌、非小细胞肺癌或间皮瘤伴体重减轻患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011 Oct;24(5):431-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2011.01189.x. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.《系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目声明》:针对评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的报告规范解释与阐述
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136. Epub 2009 Jul 20.