Suppr超能文献

素食货车试点研究:流动农产品市场对服务不足社区的果蔬获取及摄入量的影响

Veggie Van Pilot Study: Impact of a Mobile Produce Market for Underserved Communities on Fruit and Vegetable Access and Intake.

作者信息

Leone Lucia A, Haynes-Maslow Lindsey, Ammerman Alice S

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Department of Youth, Family, and Community Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2017;12(1):89-100. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2016.1175399. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

Abstract

We conducted a pilot evaluation of the Veggie Van, a mobile produce market that brings weekly boxes of reduced-cost locally grown fruits and vegetables (F&V) to lower-income communities and offers cooking and nutrition education to customers. We conducted surveys just prior to starting Veggie Van at each of 3 sites and again at 2-3 months. F&V intake was measured with a 2-question item and a 10-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in a subset of participants. At baseline, average servings/day of F&V was 4.9 (SD = 2.6, n = 60). At follow-up, individuals who reported shopping at Veggie Van frequently (n = 32) increased their F&V consumption by 0.41 servings/day compared with a decrease of -1.19 for those who rarely/never used Veggie Van (n = 27), a total difference of 1.6 servings/day (P = .01). There were no statistically significant differences in F&V consumption between groups based on the FFQ measure. Frequent shoppers reported additional health improvements and increases in their ability to buy enough F&V. We conclude that offering weekly boxes of affordable F&V paired with education in underserved communities may improve F&V consumption for frequent program users.

摘要

我们对“蔬菜车”进行了一项试点评估,这是一个流动农产品市场,每周为低收入社区提供低价本地种植的水果和蔬菜礼盒,并为顾客提供烹饪和营养教育。我们在3个地点启动“蔬菜车”项目之前分别进行了调查,在2至3个月后再次进行调查。在一部分参与者中,通过一个包含2个问题的条目和一份10项食物频率问卷(FFQ)来测量水果和蔬菜的摄入量。基线时,水果和蔬菜的平均每日摄入量为4.9份(标准差=2.6,n=60)。随访时,经常在“蔬菜车”购物的个体(n=32)水果和蔬菜的摄入量增加了0.41份/天,而很少/从不使用“蔬菜车”的个体(n=27)摄入量减少了1.19份/天,两者的总差异为1.6份/天(P=0.01)。根据食物频率问卷测量,两组之间在水果和蔬菜摄入量上没有统计学上的显著差异。经常购物者报告称健康状况有了额外改善,购买足够水果和蔬菜的能力也有所提高。我们得出结论,在服务不足的社区提供每周的低价水果和蔬菜礼盒并配以教育,可能会提高经常参与项目的用户对水果和蔬菜的消费量。

相似文献

1
Veggie Van Pilot Study: Impact of a Mobile Produce Market for Underserved Communities on Fruit and Vegetable Access and Intake.
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2017;12(1):89-100. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2016.1175399. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
4
10

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Process to Recruit and Select Community Partners for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):159-171. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0021.
2
LGBTQ+ food insufficiency in New England.
Agric Human Values. 2022 Dec 9:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10403-5.
3
An explorative study with convenience vegetables in urban Nigeria-The Veg-on-Wheels intervention.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0273309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273309. eCollection 2022.
6
Qualitative Perceptions of an Anticipated Fresh Food Prescription Program.
Health Behav Policy Rev. 2022 Jan;9(1):670-682. doi: 10.14485/hbpr.9.1.5.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the Perceived Nutrition Environment Measures Survey.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.004.
2
Low-Income Individuals' Perceptions About Fruit and Vegetable Access Programs: A Qualitative Study.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 Jul-Aug;47(4):317-24.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
3
Attitudes Toward Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Farmers' Market Usage Among Low-Income North Carolinians.
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2012;7(1):64-76. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2012.651386.
5
A farmers' market at a federally qualified health center improves fruit and vegetable intake among low-income diabetics.
Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验