• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Veggie Van Pilot Study: Impact of a Mobile Produce Market for Underserved Communities on Fruit and Vegetable Access and Intake.素食货车试点研究:流动农产品市场对服务不足社区的果蔬获取及摄入量的影响
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2017;12(1):89-100. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2016.1175399. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
2
Cluster randomized controlled trial of a mobile market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake among adults in lower-income communities in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州低收入社区成年人中通过移动市场干预增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的整群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0637-1.
3
The Veggie Van: Customer characteristics, fruit and vegetable consumption, and barriers to healthy eating among shoppers at a mobile farmers market in the United States.流动食品车:美国一家移动农贸市场的顾客特征、水果和蔬菜消费以及健康饮食障碍。
Appetite. 2019 Feb 1;133:279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.025. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
4
Increasing access and affordability of produce improves perceived consumption of vegetables in low-income seniors.增加农产品的可获取性和可承受性可提高低收入老年人对蔬菜的感知消费量。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Oct;111(10):1549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.003.
5
A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Mobile Produce Market Program in 12 Communities in North Carolina: Program Development, Methods, and Baseline Characteristics.北卡罗来纳州 12 个社区的移动农产品市场计划的整群随机试验:计划制定、方法和基线特征。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jan;119(1):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
6
Using implementation mapping to refine strategies to improve implementation of an evidence-based mobile market intervention: a study protocol.使用实施映射来完善策略以改善基于证据的移动市场干预措施的实施:一项研究方案。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Feb 13;4:1288160. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1288160. eCollection 2024.
7
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Research-Tested Mobile Produce Market Model Designed to Improve Diet in Under-Resourced Communities: Rationale and Design for the Veggie Van Study.一项旨在改善资源匮乏社区饮食的经过研究测试的移动农产品市场模型的随机对照试验:Veggie Van 研究的原理和设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9832. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169832.
8
A multi-level intervention in subsidized housing sites to increase fruit and vegetable access and intake: Rationale, design and methods of the 'Live Well, Viva Bien' cluster randomized trial.一项在保障性住房小区开展的多层次干预措施,以增加水果和蔬菜的可及性及摄入量:“生活美好,活力无限”整群随机试验的理论依据、设计与方法
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 28;16:521. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3141-7.
9
Feasibility and Acceptability of Brighter Bites: A Food Co-Op in Schools to Increase Access, Continuity and Education of Fruits and Vegetables Among Low-Income Populations.“更健康的一口”项目的可行性与可接受性:一项学校食品合作社计划,旨在增加低收入人群获取水果和蔬菜的机会、连贯性并开展相关教育。
J Prim Prev. 2015 Aug;36(4):281-6. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0395-2.
10
Baseline fruit and vegetable intake among adults in seven 5 a day study centers located in diverse geographic areas.位于不同地理区域的7个“每日5份蔬果”研究中心的成年人的基线蔬果摄入量。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Oct;99(10):1241-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00306-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Process to Recruit and Select Community Partners for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study.一种新颖的流程,用于招募和选择社区合作伙伴,以开展混合实施-效果研究。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):159-171. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0021.
2
LGBTQ+ food insufficiency in New England.新英格兰地区 LGBTQ+ 群体的食物匮乏问题。
Agric Human Values. 2022 Dec 9:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10403-5.
3
An explorative study with convenience vegetables in urban Nigeria-The Veg-on-Wheels intervention.在尼日利亚城市进行的探索性研究——“车轮上的蔬菜”干预措施。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0273309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273309. eCollection 2022.
4
Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mobile Produce Market Operations: Adaptations, Barriers, and Future Directions for Increasing Food Access.新冠肺炎疫情对流动农产品市场运营的影响:增加食物获取机会的适应措施、障碍和未来方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 10;19(18):11390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811390.
5
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Research-Tested Mobile Produce Market Model Designed to Improve Diet in Under-Resourced Communities: Rationale and Design for the Veggie Van Study.一项旨在改善资源匮乏社区饮食的经过研究测试的移动农产品市场模型的随机对照试验:Veggie Van 研究的原理和设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9832. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169832.
6
Qualitative Perceptions of an Anticipated Fresh Food Prescription Program.对预期的新鲜食品处方计划的定性认知
Health Behav Policy Rev. 2022 Jan;9(1):670-682. doi: 10.14485/hbpr.9.1.5.
7
Implementing a Rural Natural Experiment: A Protocol for Evaluating the Impacts of Food Coops on Food Consumption, Resident's Health and Community Vitality.开展一项农村自然实验:评估食品合作社对食品消费、居民健康和社区活力影响的方案
Methods Protoc. 2022 Apr 14;5(2):33. doi: 10.3390/mps5020033.
8
Behavioural change box? Applying the COM-B model to understand behavioural triggers that support consumption of fruits and vegetable among subscribers of a fruit and vegetable box scheme.行为改变框?应用 COM-B 模型理解行为触发因素,以支持水果和蔬菜订购计划的订阅者消费水果和蔬菜。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec;24(18):6488-6498. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003839. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
The introduction of new food retail opportunities in lower-income communities and the impact on fruit and vegetable intake: a systematic review.低收入社区引入新的食品零售机会及其对水果和蔬菜摄入的影响:系统评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Oct 1;9(5):837-846. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz094.
10
Cluster randomized controlled trial of a mobile market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake among adults in lower-income communities in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州低收入社区成年人中通过移动市场干预增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的整群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0637-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the Perceived Nutrition Environment Measures Survey.感知营养环境测量调查的开发。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.004.
2
Low-Income Individuals' Perceptions About Fruit and Vegetable Access Programs: A Qualitative Study.低收入个体对水果和蔬菜获取项目的认知:一项定性研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 Jul-Aug;47(4):317-24.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
3
Attitudes Toward Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Farmers' Market Usage Among Low-Income North Carolinians.北卡罗来纳州低收入人群对水果和蔬菜消费及农贸市场使用情况的态度
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2012;7(1):64-76. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2012.651386.
4
A qualitative study of perceived barriers to fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income populations, North Carolina, 2011.一项关于北卡罗来纳州低收入人群对水果和蔬菜消费的感知障碍的定性研究,2011 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E34. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120206.
5
A farmers' market at a federally qualified health center improves fruit and vegetable intake among low-income diabetics.一项在联邦合格健康中心开展的农贸市场项目提高了低收入糖尿病患者的水果和蔬菜摄入量。
Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
6
Increasing access and affordability of produce improves perceived consumption of vegetables in low-income seniors.增加农产品的可获取性和可承受性可提高低收入老年人对蔬菜的感知消费量。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Oct;111(10):1549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.003.
7
Information processes mediate the effect of a health communication intervention on fruit and vegetable consumption.信息处理过程中介导了健康传播干预对水果和蔬菜消费的影响。
J Health Commun. 2011 Mar;16(3):282-99. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.532294.
8
State-specific trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults --- United States, 2000-2009.美国成年人水果和蔬菜消费的各州趋势 --- 2000-2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Sep 10;59(35):1125-30.
9
Fruit and vegetable intakes and subsequent changes in body weight in European populations: results from the project on Diet, Obesity, and Genes (DiOGenes).欧洲人群的水果和蔬菜摄入量及其随后的体重变化:饮食、肥胖与基因(DiOGenes)项目的结果
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jul;90(1):202-9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27394. Epub 2009 May 20.
10
Perceptions of individual and community environmental influences on fruit and vegetable intake, North Carolina, 2004.2004年北卡罗来纳州关于个人及社区环境对水果和蔬菜摄入量影响的认知情况
Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jan;6(1):A04. Epub 2008 Dec 15.

素食货车试点研究:流动农产品市场对服务不足社区的果蔬获取及摄入量的影响

Veggie Van Pilot Study: Impact of a Mobile Produce Market for Underserved Communities on Fruit and Vegetable Access and Intake.

作者信息

Leone Lucia A, Haynes-Maslow Lindsey, Ammerman Alice S

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Department of Youth, Family, and Community Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2017;12(1):89-100. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2016.1175399. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1080/19320248.2016.1175399
PMID:28529669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5436625/
Abstract

We conducted a pilot evaluation of the Veggie Van, a mobile produce market that brings weekly boxes of reduced-cost locally grown fruits and vegetables (F&V) to lower-income communities and offers cooking and nutrition education to customers. We conducted surveys just prior to starting Veggie Van at each of 3 sites and again at 2-3 months. F&V intake was measured with a 2-question item and a 10-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in a subset of participants. At baseline, average servings/day of F&V was 4.9 (SD = 2.6, n = 60). At follow-up, individuals who reported shopping at Veggie Van frequently (n = 32) increased their F&V consumption by 0.41 servings/day compared with a decrease of -1.19 for those who rarely/never used Veggie Van (n = 27), a total difference of 1.6 servings/day (P = .01). There were no statistically significant differences in F&V consumption between groups based on the FFQ measure. Frequent shoppers reported additional health improvements and increases in their ability to buy enough F&V. We conclude that offering weekly boxes of affordable F&V paired with education in underserved communities may improve F&V consumption for frequent program users.

摘要

我们对“蔬菜车”进行了一项试点评估,这是一个流动农产品市场,每周为低收入社区提供低价本地种植的水果和蔬菜礼盒,并为顾客提供烹饪和营养教育。我们在3个地点启动“蔬菜车”项目之前分别进行了调查,在2至3个月后再次进行调查。在一部分参与者中,通过一个包含2个问题的条目和一份10项食物频率问卷(FFQ)来测量水果和蔬菜的摄入量。基线时,水果和蔬菜的平均每日摄入量为4.9份(标准差=2.6,n=60)。随访时,经常在“蔬菜车”购物的个体(n=32)水果和蔬菜的摄入量增加了0.41份/天,而很少/从不使用“蔬菜车”的个体(n=27)摄入量减少了1.19份/天,两者的总差异为1.6份/天(P=0.01)。根据食物频率问卷测量,两组之间在水果和蔬菜摄入量上没有统计学上的显著差异。经常购物者报告称健康状况有了额外改善,购买足够水果和蔬菜的能力也有所提高。我们得出结论,在服务不足的社区提供每周的低价水果和蔬菜礼盒并配以教育,可能会提高经常参与项目的用户对水果和蔬菜的消费量。