• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新颖的流程,用于招募和选择社区合作伙伴,以开展混合实施-效果研究。

A Novel Process to Recruit and Select Community Partners for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):159-171. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0021.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2023.0021
PMID:37462585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10569409/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Creating strong partnerships with community organizations is essential to test implementation of evidence-based interventions. However, partners are often chosen based on convenience rather than capacity or diversity. Streamlined processes are needed to identify qualified, diverse, and invested partners to conduct community-based research.

OBJECTIVES

There is a gap in the literature on effective and efficient processes for recruiting partners. This paper aims to fill that gap by describing a novel approach for identifying a diverse group of community organizations to participate in research.

METHODS

We used a Request for Partners (RFP) approach to recruit partners to participate in a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study of the Veggie Van mobile market model. The process included formative work to inform RFP development, creation of an external advisory committee, an intent-to-apply round, a full application round, and an inperson training and selection process. Data was collected to characterize applicant size, location, and experience; pre-post surveys were conducted to understand the training's utility.

RESULTS

We received 59 intent-to-apply submissions and invited 28 organizations to apply: 17 submitted applications and 12 organizations were chosen as finalists. The process took approximately 8 months to recruit 9 organizations and 32 community sites across 5 states and increased understanding of the intervention and partner responsibilities.

CONCLUSIONS

An RFP process is familiar to many community organizations that compete for grant funding but may not have prior research experience. This process streamlined recruitment timelines, increased diversity, and cultivated community among organizations. It may also improve research transparency, study completion, and intervention fidelity.

摘要

背景

与社区组织建立强有力的伙伴关系对于检验基于证据的干预措施的实施至关重要。然而,合作伙伴通常是基于方便而不是能力或多样性来选择的。需要简化流程,以确定合格、多样化和有投资意愿的合作伙伴来进行基于社区的研究。

目的

在招募合作伙伴的有效和高效流程方面,文献中存在空白。本文旨在通过描述一种识别多样化社区组织参与研究的新方法来填补这一空白。

方法

我们使用请求合作伙伴(RFP)方法招募合作伙伴参与 Veggie Van 移动市场模型的混合实施效果研究。该过程包括为 RFP 制定提供信息的基础工作、创建外部顾问委员会、意向申请轮次、完整申请轮次以及现场培训和选择过程。收集数据以描述申请人的规模、地点和经验;进行预-后调查以了解培训的效用。

结果

我们收到了 59 份意向申请,并邀请了 28 家组织申请:17 家提交了申请,其中 12 家组织被选为决赛选手。整个招募过程耗时约 8 个月,共在 5 个州招募了 9 家组织和 32 个社区站点,并增加了对干预措施和合作伙伴责任的理解。

结论

RFP 流程对于许多竞争赠款资金的社区组织来说是熟悉的,但他们可能没有先前的研究经验。该流程简化了招募时间表,增加了多样性,并培养了组织之间的社区意识。它还可能提高研究透明度、完成率和干预措施的保真度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ee/10569409/467527deab2d/nihms-1934573-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ee/10569409/467527deab2d/nihms-1934573-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ee/10569409/467527deab2d/nihms-1934573-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Process to Recruit and Select Community Partners for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study.一种新颖的流程,用于招募和选择社区合作伙伴,以开展混合实施-效果研究。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):159-171. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0021.
2
Recruiting Community Partners for Veggie Van: Strategies and Lessons Learned From a Mobile Market Intervention in North Carolina, 2012-2015.为“蔬菜车”招募社区合作伙伴:2012 - 2015年在北卡罗来纳州进行的移动市场干预的策略与经验教训
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Apr 27;14:E36. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160475.
3
Using implementation mapping to refine strategies to improve implementation of an evidence-based mobile market intervention: a study protocol.使用实施映射来完善策略以改善基于证据的移动市场干预措施的实施:一项研究方案。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Feb 13;4:1288160. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1288160. eCollection 2024.
4
Randomized controlled trial of Nuevo Amanecer: a peer-delivered stress management intervention for Spanish-speaking Latinas with breast cancer.Nuevo Amanecer 的随机对照试验:一项针对西班牙语裔拉丁裔乳腺癌患者的同伴提供的压力管理干预。
Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):230-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774514521906. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Participatory development and pilot testing of iChoose: an adaptation of an evidence-based paediatric weight management program for community implementation.参与式发展和 iChoose 的试点测试:对基于证据的儿科体重管理计划进行改编,以用于社区实施。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 29;19(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6450-9.
7
NIH-Funded CBPR: Self-Reported Community Partner and Investigator Perspectives.NIH 资助的 CBPR:自我报告的社区伙伴和调查员观点。
J Community Health. 2019 Aug;44(4):740-748. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00661-6.
8
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
9
10
A Model for Strengthening Collaborative Research Capacity: Illustrations From the Atlanta Clinical Translational Science Institute.加强协作研究能力的模型:来自亚特兰大临床与转化科学研究所的实例
Health Educ Behav. 2014 Jun;41(3):267-74. doi: 10.1177/1090198113511815. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Using implementation mapping to refine strategies to improve implementation of an evidence-based mobile market intervention: a study protocol.使用实施映射来完善策略以改善基于证据的移动市场干预措施的实施:一项研究方案。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Feb 13;4:1288160. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1288160. eCollection 2024.
2
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Research-Tested Mobile Produce Market Model Designed to Improve Diet in Under-Resourced Communities: Rationale and Design for the Veggie Van Study.一项旨在改善资源匮乏社区饮食的经过研究测试的移动农产品市场模型的随机对照试验:Veggie Van 研究的原理和设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9832. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169832.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Using common practices to establish a framework for mobile produce markets in the United States.运用常见做法为美国的移动农产品市场建立一个框架。
J Agric Food Syst Community Dev. 2021;10(4):73-84. doi: 10.5304/jafscd.2021.104.029. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
2
Recruiting and retaining service agencies and public health providers in longitudinal studies: Implications for community-engaged implementation research.在纵向研究中招募并留住服务机构和公共卫生服务提供者:对社区参与式实施研究的启示
Method Innov. 2018 Jan-Apr;11(1). doi: 10.1177/2059799118770996. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
3
A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Mobile Produce Market Program in 12 Communities in North Carolina: Program Development, Methods, and Baseline Characteristics.
Operational challenges that may affect implementation of evidence-based mobile market interventions.
可能影响循证移动市场干预措施实施的操作挑战。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 16;22(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13207-8.
北卡罗来纳州 12 个社区的移动农产品市场计划的整群随机试验:计划制定、方法和基线特征。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jan;119(1):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
4
Cluster randomized controlled trial of a mobile market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake among adults in lower-income communities in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州低收入社区成年人中通过移动市场干预增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的整群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0637-1.
5
Opportunities and challenges in conducting community-engaged dissemination/implementation research.开展社区参与式传播/实施研究的机遇与挑战。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):389-392. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0520-2.
6
A Community-Based Participatory Research Guided Model for the Dissemination of Evidence-Based Interventions.一种基于社区参与式研究的循证干预传播指导模型。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(4):585-595. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0067.
7
Veggie Van Pilot Study: Impact of a Mobile Produce Market for Underserved Communities on Fruit and Vegetable Access and Intake.素食货车试点研究:流动农产品市场对服务不足社区的果蔬获取及摄入量的影响
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2017;12(1):89-100. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2016.1175399. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
8
Recruiting Community Partners for Veggie Van: Strategies and Lessons Learned From a Mobile Market Intervention in North Carolina, 2012-2015.为“蔬菜车”招募社区合作伙伴:2012 - 2015年在北卡罗来纳州进行的移动市场干预的策略与经验教训
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Apr 27;14:E36. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160475.
9
Community-Academic Partnerships: A Systematic Review of the State of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research.社区-学术伙伴关系:文献现状的系统综述及对未来研究的建议
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):163-214. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12184.
10
Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions.扩大公共卫生干预措施的模式与成功因素的叙述性综述。
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 12;10:113. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0301-6.