Suppr超能文献

在巴西医疗环境中,奥马珠单抗附加于标准治疗方案用于控制不佳的重度过敏性哮喘患者的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab add-on to standard-of-care therapy in patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma in a Brazilian healthcare setting.

作者信息

Suzuki Cibele, Lopes da Silva Nilceia, Kumar Praveen, Pathak Purnima, Ong Siew Hwa

机构信息

a Novartis Biociências S.A. , São Paulo , Brazil.

b Novartis Healthcare Private Ltd , Hyderabad , India.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2017 Aug;20(8):832-839. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1333513. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Omalizumab add-on to standard-of-care therapy has proven to be efficacious in severe asthma patients for whom exacerbations cannot be controlled otherwise. Moreover, evidence from different healthcare settings suggests reduced healthcare resource utilization with omalizumab. Based on these findings, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the addition of omalizumab to standard-of-care therapy in patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma in a Brazilian healthcare setting.

METHODS

A previously published Markov model was adapted using Brazil-specific unit costs to compare the costs and outcomes of the addition of omalizumab to standard-of-care therapy vs standard-of-care therapy alone. Model inputs were largely based on the eXpeRience study. Costs and health outcomes were calculated for lifetime-years and were annually discounted at 5%. Both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

An additional cost of R$280,400 for 5.20 additional quality-adjusted life-years was estimated with the addition of omalizumab to standard-of-care therapy, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R$53,890. One-way sensitivity analysis indicated that discount rates, standard-of-care therapy exacerbation rates, and exacerbation-related mortality rates had the largest impact on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

LIMITATIONS

Assumptions of lifetime treatment adherence and rate of future exacerbations, independent of previous events, might affect the findings. The lack of Brazilian patients in the eXpeRience study may affect the findings, although sample size and baseline characteristics suggest that the modeled population closely resembles Brazilian severe allergic asthma patients.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that omalizumab as an add-on therapy is more cost-effective than standard-of-care therapy alone for Brazilian patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma, based on the World Health Organization's cost-effectiveness threshold of up to 3-times the gross domestic product.

摘要

目的

对于病情加重无法通过其他方式控制的重度哮喘患者,在标准治疗方案基础上加用奥马珠单抗已被证明是有效的。此外,来自不同医疗环境的证据表明,奥马珠单抗可降低医疗资源的使用。基于这些发现,本研究旨在评估在巴西医疗环境中,对于未得到控制的重度过敏性哮喘患者,在标准治疗方案基础上加用奥马珠单抗的成本效益。

方法

采用巴西特定的单位成本对之前发表的马尔可夫模型进行调整,以比较在标准治疗方案基础上加用奥马珠单抗与单独使用标准治疗方案的成本和结果。模型输入主要基于“经验”研究。计算终身年的成本和健康结果,并按每年5%进行贴现。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析。

结果

在标准治疗方案基础上加用奥马珠单抗估计会增加280,400雷亚尔的额外成本,同时增加5.20个质量调整生命年,增量成本效益比为53,890雷亚尔。单向敏感性分析表明,贴现率、标准治疗方案的病情加重率以及与病情加重相关的死亡率对增量成本效益比影响最大。

局限性

终身治疗依从性和未来病情加重率的假设(独立于既往事件)可能会影响研究结果。“经验”研究中缺乏巴西患者可能会影响研究结果,尽管样本量和基线特征表明建模人群与巴西重度过敏性哮喘患者非常相似。

结论

根据世界卫生组织高达国内生产总值3倍的成本效益阈值,结果表明,对于巴西未得到控制的重度过敏性哮喘患者,奥马珠单抗作为附加疗法比单独使用标准治疗方案更具成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验