Brown Sarah R, Sherratt Debbie, Booth Gill, Brown Julia, Collinson Fiona, Gregory Walter, Flanagan Louise
Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Clin Trials. 2017 Aug;14(4):349-356. doi: 10.1177/1740774517710250. Epub 2017 May 22.
Early phase trials are essential in drug development, determining appropriate dose levels and assessing preliminary activity. These trials are undertaken by industry and academia, with increasing collaborations between the two. There is pressure to perform these trials quickly, safely, and robustly. However, there are inherent differences between developing and managing early phase, compared to late phase, drug trials. This article describes an approach to establishing an academically led early phase trial portfolio, highlighting lessons learned and sharing experiences.
In 2009, the University of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit became the Clinical Trials Coordinating Office for Myeloma UK's phase I and II trials. We embarked on a transition from working extensively in phase III to early phase trials development and conduct. This involved evaluating and revising our well-established standard operating procedures, visiting other academic early phase units, and developing essential new documentation and processes.
A core team of trial and data managers and statisticians was established to facilitate expertise and knowledge retention. A detailed training plan was implemented focussing on essential standard practices for early phase. These included pharmacovigilance, recruitment, trial design and set-up, data and site monitoring, and oversight committees. Training in statistical methods for early phase trials was incorporated.
Initial scoping of early phase trial management and conduct was essential in establishing this early phase portfolio. Many of the processes developed were successful. However, regular review and evaluation were implemented to enable changes and ensure efficiencies. It is recommended that others embarking on this venture build on the experiences described in this article.
早期试验在药物研发中至关重要,可确定合适的剂量水平并评估初步活性。这些试验由制药行业和学术界开展,双方合作日益增多。存在快速、安全且稳健地开展这些试验的压力。然而,与后期药物试验相比,早期试验的开展和管理存在固有差异。本文描述了一种建立以学术为主导的早期试验组合的方法,强调经验教训并分享经验。
2009年,利兹大学临床试验研究单位成为英国骨髓瘤协会I期和II期试验的临床试验协调办公室。我们着手从广泛参与III期试验过渡到早期试验的开发和实施。这包括评估和修订我们完善的标准操作规程,走访其他学术性早期试验单位,以及制定重要的新文件和流程。
成立了一个由试验、数据管理人员和统计学家组成的核心团队,以促进专业知识和经验的保留。实施了一项详细的培训计划,重点是早期试验的基本标准做法。这些包括药物警戒、招募、试验设计与设置、数据和现场监测以及监督委员会。纳入了早期试验统计方法的培训。
早期试验管理和实施的初步规划对于建立这个早期试验组合至关重要。所制定的许多流程都很成功。然而,实施了定期审查和评估以实现变革并确保效率。建议其他开展此项工作的人借鉴本文所述经验。