Axente Carmen, Licker Monica, Moldovan Roxana, Hogea Elena, Muntean Delia, Horhat Florin, Bedreag Ovidiu, Sandesc Dorel, Papurica Marius, Dugaesescu Dorina, Voicu Mirela, Baditoiu Luminita
Microbiology Department, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Victor Babeş, Timişoara, Romania.
Pius Branzeu" Emergency Clinical County Hospital, Timişoara, Romania.
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 May 22;17(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2440-7.
Due to the vulnerable nature of its patients, the wide use of invasive devices and broad-spectrum antimicrobials used, the intensive care unit (ICU) is often called the epicentre of infections. In the present study, we quantified the burden of hospital acquired pathology in a Romanian university hospital ICU, represented by antimicrobial agents consumption, costs and local resistance patterns, in order to identify multimodal interventional strategies.
Between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013, a prospective study was conducted in the largest ICU of Western Romania. The study group was divided into four sub-samples: patients who only received prophylactic antibiotherapy, those with community-acquired infections, patients who developed hospital acquired infections and patients with community acquired infections complicated by hospital-acquired infections. The statistical analysis was performed using the EpiInfo version 3.5.4 and SPSS version 20.
A total of 1596 subjects were enrolled in the study and the recorded consumption of antimicrobial agents was 1172.40 DDD/ 1000 patient-days. The presence of hospital acquired infections doubled the length of stay (6.70 days for patients with community-acquired infections versus 16.06/14.08 days for those with hospital-acquired infections), the number of antimicrobial treatment days (5.47 in sub-sample II versus 11.18/12.13 in sub-samples III/IV) and they increased by 4 times compared to uninfected patients. The perioperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment had an average length duration of 2.78 while the empirical antimicrobial therapy was 3.96 days in sample II and 4.75/4.85 days for the patients with hospital-acquired infections. The incidence density of resistant strains was 8.27/1000 patient-days for methicilin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 7.88 for extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and 4.68/1000 patient-days for multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
Some of the most important circumstances collectively contributing to increasing the consumption of antimicrobials and high incidence densities of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the studied ICU, are represented by prolonged chemoprophylaxis and empirical treatment and also by not applying the definitive antimicrobial therapy, especially in patients with favourable evolution under empirical antibiotic treatment. The present data should represent convincing evidence for policy changes in the antibiotic therapy.
由于重症监护病房(ICU)患者体质脆弱,侵入性设备广泛使用,且使用了广谱抗菌药物,ICU常被称为感染的中心。在本研究中,我们对罗马尼亚一家大学医院ICU中医院获得性病理负担进行了量化,以抗菌药物消耗、成本和局部耐药模式为代表,以便确定多模式干预策略。
2012年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间,在罗马尼亚西部最大的ICU进行了一项前瞻性研究。研究组分为四个子样本:仅接受预防性抗菌治疗的患者、社区获得性感染患者、发生医院获得性感染的患者以及社区获得性感染并发医院获得性感染的患者。使用EpiInfo 3.5.4版和SPSS 20版进行统计分析。
共有1596名受试者纳入研究,记录的抗菌药物消耗量为1172.40 DDD/1000患者日。医院获得性感染的存在使住院时间增加了一倍(社区获得性感染患者为6.70天,医院获得性感染患者为16.06/14.08天),抗菌治疗天数增加(子样本II为5.47天,子样本III/IV为11.18/12.13天),与未感染患者相比增加了4倍。围手术期预防性抗生素治疗的平均时长为2.78天,经验性抗菌治疗在样本II中为3.96天,医院获得性感染患者为4.75/4.85天。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药菌株发病密度为8.27/1000患者日,产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肺炎克雷伯菌为7.88,多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌为4.68/1000患者日。
在所研究的ICU中,导致抗菌药物消耗增加和多重耐药菌高发病密度的一些最重要因素包括长期化学预防和经验性治疗,以及未应用确定性抗菌治疗,特别是在经验性抗生素治疗下病情好转的患者中。目前的数据应为抗生素治疗政策的改变提供有说服力的证据。