Soleimanifar Manijeh, Karimi Noureddin, Arab Amir Massoud
Biomechanic Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, AJA University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Apr;21(2):240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has been implicated as a potential source of low back and buttock pain. Several types of motion palpation and pain provocation tests are used to evaluate SIJ dysfunction.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between motion palpation and pain provocation tests in assessment of SIJ problems.
This study is Descriptive Correlation.
50 patients between the ages of 20 and 65 participated. Four motion palpation tests (Sitting flexion, Standing flexion, Prone knee flexion, Gillet test) and three pain provocation tests (FABER, Posterior shear, Resisted abduction test) were examined. Chi-square analysis was used to assess the relationship between results of the individuals and composites of these two groups of tests.
No significant relationship was found between these two groups of tests.
It seems that motion palpation tests assess SIJ dysfunction and provocative tests assessed SIJ pain which do not appear to be related.
骶髂关节（SIJ）被认为是下背部和臀部疼痛的潜在来源。几种类型的运动触诊和疼痛激发试验用于评估骶髂关节功能障碍。
本研究的目的是调查运动触诊和疼痛激发试验在评估骶髂关节问题中的关系。
本研究为描述性相关性研究。
50名年龄在20至65岁之间的患者参与。检查了四项运动触诊试验（坐位屈曲、站立位屈曲、俯卧位屈膝、吉列试验）和三项疼痛激发试验（FABER试验、后剪切试验、抗外展试验）。采用卡方分析评估这两组试验的个体结果与综合结果之间的关系。
这两组试验之间未发现显著关系。
似乎运动触诊试验评估骶髂关节功能障碍，而激发试验评估骶髂关节疼痛，二者似乎并无关联。
