Arab Amir Massoud, Abdollahi Iraj, Joghataei Mohammad Taghi, Golafshani Zahra, Kazemnejad Anoshirvan
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Evin, Tehran, Iran.
Man Ther. 2009 Apr;14(2):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Mar 25.
The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has been implicated as a potential source of low back and buttock pain. Several types of motion palpation and provocation tests are used to examine the SIJ. It has been suggested that use of a cluster of motion palpation or provocation tests is a more acceptable method than single test to assess SIJ. This study examined the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of the motion palpation and provocation tests together. Twenty-five patients between the ages of 20 and 65 years participated. Four motion palpation and three provocation tests were examined three times on both sides (left, right) by two examiners. Kappa coefficient and prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) were calculated to evaluate the reliability. PABAK for intra- and inter-examiner reliability of individual tests ranged from 0.36 to 0.84 (95% CI: -0.22 to 1.12) and 0.52 to 0.84 (95% CI: -0.18 to 1.08) which is considered fair to substantial. PABAK for intra- and inter-examiner reliability for clusters of motion palpation or provocation tests ranged from 0.44 to 0.92 (95% CI: -0.36 to 1.2) which is considered moderate to excellent reliability. PABAK for intra- and inter-examiner reliability of composites of motion palpation and provocation tests ranged from 0.44 to 1.00 (95% CI: -0.22 to 1.12) and 0.52 to 0.92 (95% CI: -0.02 to 1.32) which is considered substantial to excellent. It seems that composites of motion palpation and provocation tests together have reliability sufficiently high for use in clinical assessment of the SIJ.
骶髂关节(SIJ)被认为是下背部和臀部疼痛的一个潜在来源。几种类型的运动触诊和激发试验被用于检查骶髂关节。有人提出,使用一组运动触诊或激发试验比单一试验是评估骶髂关节更可接受的方法。本研究共同检验了运动触诊和激发试验单一及综合方法在检查者间和检查者内的可靠性。25名年龄在20至65岁之间的患者参与了研究。两名检查者对两侧(左侧、右侧)进行了四次运动触诊和三次激发试验,各进行三次。计算kappa系数以及患病率调整和偏差调整kappa(PABAK)以评估可靠性。单项试验在检查者内和检查者间可靠性的PABAK范围为0.36至0.84(95%可信区间:-0.22至1.12)和0.52至0.84(95%可信区间:-0.18至1.08),被认为是一般到较高。运动触诊或激发试验组合在检查者内和检查者间可靠性的PABAK范围为0.44至0.92(95%可信区间:-0.36至1.2),被认为是中等至优秀的可靠性。运动触诊和激发试验综合方法在检查者内和检查者间可靠性的PABAK范围为0.44至1.00(95%可信区间:-0.22至1.12)和0.52至0.92(95%可信区间:-0.02至1.32),被认为是较高到优秀。运动触诊和激发试验综合方法似乎具有足够高的可靠性,可用于骶髂关节的临床评估。