Suppr超能文献

临床心理学研究实践中的回归假设——常见误解的系统综述

Regression assumptions in clinical psychology research practice-a systematic review of common misconceptions.

作者信息

Ernst Anja F, Albers Casper J

机构信息

Heymans Institute for Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2017 May 16;5:e3323. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3323. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Misconceptions about the assumptions behind the standard linear regression model are widespread and dangerous. These lead to using linear regression when inappropriate, and to employing alternative procedures with less statistical power when unnecessary. Our systematic literature review investigated employment and reporting of assumption checks in twelve clinical psychology journals. Findings indicate that normality of the variables themselves, rather than of the errors, was wrongfully held for a necessary assumption in 4% of papers that use regression. Furthermore, 92% of all papers using linear regression were unclear about their assumption checks, violating APA-recommendations. This paper appeals for a heightened awareness for and increased transparency in the reporting of statistical assumption checking.

摘要

关于标准线性回归模型背后假设的误解广泛存在且十分危险。这些误解导致在不适当的时候使用线性回归,以及在不必要时采用统计功效较低的替代程序。我们的系统文献综述调查了12种临床心理学杂志中假设检验的使用和报告情况。研究结果表明,在4%使用回归分析的论文中,错误地将变量本身(而非误差)的正态性视为必要假设。此外,所有使用线性回归的论文中有92%对其假设检验情况不明确,违反了美国心理学会的建议。本文呼吁提高对统计假设检验报告的认识并增强透明度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e9b/5436580/84fa6100bbf8/peerj-05-3323-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验