• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对触觉辅助的信任:基于错误历史对视觉和触觉线索进行加权。

Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.

作者信息

Gibo Tricia L, Mugge Winfred, Abbink David A

机构信息

Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of 3 mE, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2017 Aug;235(8):2533-2546. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4986-4. Epub 2017 May 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-017-4986-4
PMID:28534068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5502061/
Abstract

To effectively interpret and interact with the world, humans weight redundant estimates from different sensory cues to form one coherent, integrated estimate. Recent advancements in physical assistance systems, where guiding forces are computed by an intelligent agent, enable the presentation of augmented cues. It is unknown, however, if cue weighting can be extended to augmented cues. Previous research has shown that cue weighting is determined by the reliability (inversely related to uncertainty) of cues within a trial, yet augmented cues may also be affected by errors that vary over trials. In this study, we investigate whether people can learn to appropriately weight a haptic cue from an intelligent assistance system based on its error history. Subjects held a haptic device and reached to a hidden target using a visual (Gaussian distributed dots) and haptic (force channel) cue. The error of the augmented haptic cue varied from trial to trial based on a Gaussian distribution. Subjects learned to estimate the target location by weighting the visual and augmented haptic cues based on their perceptual uncertainty and experienced errors. With both cues available, subjects were able to find the target with an improved or equal performance compared to what was possible with one cue alone. Our results show that the brain can learn to reweight augmented cues from intelligent agents, akin to previous observations of the reweighting of naturally occurring cues. In addition, these results suggest that the weighting of a cue is not only affected by its within-trial reliability but also the history of errors.

摘要

为了有效地理解世界并与之互动,人类会权衡来自不同感官线索的冗余估计,以形成一个连贯、综合的估计。在物理辅助系统中,引导力由智能代理计算,最近的进展使得增强线索得以呈现。然而,线索加权是否可以扩展到增强线索尚不清楚。先前的研究表明,线索加权由试验中线索的可靠性(与不确定性成反比)决定,但增强线索也可能受到试验间变化的误差影响。在本研究中,我们调查人们是否可以根据智能辅助系统的错误历史学会适当地权衡触觉线索。受试者手持触觉设备,利用视觉(高斯分布的点)和触觉(力通道)线索伸向一个隐藏目标。增强触觉线索的误差根据高斯分布在试验间变化。受试者学会根据视觉和增强触觉线索的感知不确定性和经历的误差来估计目标位置。与仅使用一个线索时相比,当两个线索都可用时,受试者能够以更好或相同的表现找到目标。我们的结果表明,大脑可以学会重新权衡来自智能代理的增强线索,这类似于之前对自然出现线索重新加权的观察。此外,这些结果表明,线索的加权不仅受其试验内可靠性的影响,还受错误历史的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/5502061/ef9732c20bf2/221_2017_4986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/5502061/9f166f1996de/221_2017_4986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/5502061/d21b566f86c1/221_2017_4986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/5502061/715e23239967/221_2017_4986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/5502061/ef9732c20bf2/221_2017_4986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/5502061/9f166f1996de/221_2017_4986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/5502061/d21b566f86c1/221_2017_4986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/5502061/715e23239967/221_2017_4986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/5502061/ef9732c20bf2/221_2017_4986_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.对触觉辅助的信任:基于错误历史对视觉和触觉线索进行加权。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Aug;235(8):2533-2546. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4986-4. Epub 2017 May 22.
2
Texture and haptic cues in slant discrimination: reliability-based cue weighting without statistically optimal cue combination.倾斜辨别中的纹理和触觉线索:基于可靠性的线索加权,而非统计上最优的线索组合。
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2005 May;22(5):801-9. doi: 10.1364/josaa.22.000801.
3
Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.与关节式工具的最佳视觉-触觉整合。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 May;235(5):1361-1373. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4896-5. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
4
Reliance on Haptic Assistance Reflected in Haptic Cue Weighting.触觉辅助的依赖反映在触觉提示的权重中。
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2019 Jan-Mar;12(1):68-77. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2018.2864278. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
5
Visual-haptic adaptation is determined by relative reliability.视触觉适应由相对可靠性决定。
J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 2;30(22):7714-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6427-09.2010.
6
[Visual cuing effect for haptic angle judgment].[触觉角度判断的视觉提示效应]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2009 Aug;80(3):232-7. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.80.232.
7
Reweighting visual cues by touch.通过触觉重新加权视觉线索。
J Vis. 2011 Sep 27;11(10):20. doi: 10.1167/11.10.20.
8
Experience-dependent visual cue recalibration based on discrepancies between visual and haptic percepts.基于视觉与触觉感知差异的经验依赖性视觉线索重新校准。
Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(25):2603-13. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00470-x.
9
Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.视觉-触觉线索权重与特定模态注意力无关。
J Vis. 2008 Jan 31;8(1):21.1-16. doi: 10.1167/8.1.21.
10
Integration of force and position cues for shape perception through active touch.通过主动触摸整合力与位置线索以实现形状感知。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.026. Epub 2006 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Cue combination and individual differences during weight judgements using familiar and newly learned cues.在使用熟悉和新学线索进行重量判断时的线索组合与个体差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 29;15(1):10881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93947-w.
2
Correctly establishing evidence for cue combination via gains in sensory precision: Why the choice of comparator matters.正确建立通过提高感官精度来实现线索组合的证据:为什么比较器的选择很重要。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):2842-2858. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02227-w. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Newly learned shape-color associations show signatures of reliability-weighted averaging without forced fusion or a memory color effect.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistically Optimal Multisensory Cue Integration: A Practical Tutorial.统计最优多感官线索整合:实用教程
Multisens Res. 2016;29(4-5):279-317. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002510.
2
Haptic Shared Control in Tele-Manipulation: Effects of Inaccuracies in Guidance on Task Execution.远程操作中的触觉共享控制:引导不准确对任务执行的影响。
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2015 Apr-Jun;8(2):164-75. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2015.2406708. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
3
A learning-based approach to artificial sensory feedback leads to optimal integration.基于学习的人工感觉反馈方法可实现最佳整合。
新习得的形状-颜色关联表现出可靠加权平均的特征,而没有强制融合或记忆颜色效应。
J Vis. 2022 Dec 1;22(13):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.13.8.
4
Using Immersive Virtual Reality to Examine How Visual and Tactile Cues Drive the Material-Weight Illusion.使用沉浸式虚拟现实技术研究视觉和触觉线索如何驱动材料重量错觉。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Feb;84(2):509-518. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02414-x. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Jan;18(1):138-44. doi: 10.1038/nn.3883. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
4
Exploration mode affects visuohaptic integration of surface orientation.探索模式会影响表面方向的视觉触觉整合。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 20;14(13):22. doi: 10.1167/14.13.22.
5
How much to trust the senses: likelihood learning.该在多大程度上信任感官:可能性学习。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 14;14(13):13. doi: 10.1167/14.13.13.
6
Multisensory integration in action control.行动控制中的多感官整合。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 10;5:544. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00544. eCollection 2014.
7
Exploring the design space of haptic assistants: the assistance policy module.探索触觉辅助设备的设计空间:辅助策略模块。
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2013 Oct-Dec;6(4):440-52. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2013.34.
8
The vestibular system: multimodal integration and encoding of self-motion for motor control.前庭系统:运动控制的自身运动的多模态整合与编码。
Trends Neurosci. 2012 Mar;35(3):185-96. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
9
Reweighting visual cues by touch.通过触觉重新加权视觉线索。
J Vis. 2011 Sep 27;11(10):20. doi: 10.1167/11.10.20.
10
Visual-haptic cue integration with spatial and temporal disparity during pointing movements.在指向运动过程中,通过空间和时间视差实现视觉-触觉线索整合。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Apr;210(1):67-80. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2603-5. Epub 2011 Mar 4.