• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌的疗效评估

[Efficacy evaluation of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer].

作者信息

Cao Jinpeng, Ji Yong, Peng Xiang, Wu Wenhui, Cheng Longqing, Zhou Yonghui, Yang Ping

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Guangdong Foshan 528000, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 25;20(5):545-549.

PMID:28534333
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety, feasibility and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for the transverse colon cancer.

METHODS

Clinical data of 61 patients who underwent laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer (transverse group) in our department from January 2011 to January 2014 were retrospectively analyzed, which were compared with those of 155 patients undergoing laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for ascending colon cancer (ascending group) and 230 patients undergoing laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid colon cancer (sigmoid group). Differences in operative details, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications and long-term survival among 3 groups were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the baseline information were found among 3 groups(all P>0.05). The average operative time was significantly longer in transverse group as compared to ascending group and sigmoid group (192.1±58.7) min vs. (172.2±54.7) min and (169.1±53.6) min, while the blood loss [(89.7±63.6) ml, (86.3±66.3) ml, (82.6±61.5) ml], conversion rate [3.3%(2/61), 2.6%(4/155), 2.2%(5/230)], number of harvested lymph node (13.0±4.7, 14.4±6.5, 13.4±5.6), time to flatus [(2.7±1.1) d, (2.6±1.1) d, (2.5±1.0) d], time to liquid diet [(3.0±1.7) d, (2.8±1.5) d, (2.7±1.4) d], incidence of postoperative complication(6.6%, 9.0%, 11.7%), and hospital stay [(11.6±5.8) d, (10.7±5.8) d, (10.6±5.7) d] among 3 groups were not significantly different (all P>0.05). A total of 436 patients received postoperative follow-up of median 36 (5 to 67) months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 73.1%, 73.7% and 74.8%, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 71.5%, 71.1% and 72.7% in transverse, ascending and sigmoid colon cancer groups respectively, whose differences were not significant among 3 groups (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer is safe and feasible with slightly longer operation time, and has quite good long-term oncologic efficacy.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌的安全性、可行性及长期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2014年1月在我科接受腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗的61例横结肠癌患者(横结肠组)的临床资料,并与155例接受腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗的升结肠癌患者(升结肠组)和230例接受腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗的乙状结肠癌患者(乙状结肠组)进行比较。评估三组患者手术细节、术后恢复、术后并发症及长期生存情况的差异。

结果

三组患者基线资料差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。横结肠组平均手术时间显著长于升结肠组和乙状结肠组[(192.1±58.7)分钟 vs.(172.2±54.7)分钟和(169.1±53.6)分钟](P<0.05),而三组患者术中出血量[(89.7±63.6)毫升、(86.3±66.3)毫升、(82.6±61.5)毫升]、中转率[3.3%(2/61)、2.6%(4/155)、2.2%(5/230)]、清扫淋巴结数目(13.0±4.7、14.4±6.5、13.4±5.6)、排气时间[(2.7±1.1)天、(2.6±1.1)天、(2.5±1.0)天]、进流食时间[(3.0±1.7)天、(2.8±1.5)天、(2.7±1.4)天]、术后并发症发生率(6.6%、9.0%、11.7%)及住院时间[(11.6±5.8)天、(10.7±5.8)天、(10.6±5.7)天]差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。共436例患者接受术后随访,中位随访时间为36(5至67)个月。横结肠癌组、升结肠癌组和乙状结肠癌组的5年总生存率分别为73.1%、73.7%和74.8%,5年无病生存率分别为71.5%﹑71.1%和72.7%,三组差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌安全可行,手术时间稍长,长期肿瘤学疗效良好。

相似文献

1
[Efficacy evaluation of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer].腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌的疗效评估
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 25;20(5):545-549.
2
Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted and open complete mesocolic excision (CME) for the treatment of transverse colon cancer.腹腔镜辅助与开放全结肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗横结肠癌的短期疗效比较。
Chin Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;6(1):6. doi: 10.21037/cco.2017.01.01.
3
Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision via combined medial and cranial approaches for transverse colon cancer.腹腔镜下经联合内侧和头侧入路行横结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术
Surg Today. 2017 May;47(5):643-649. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1409-2. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
4
An Optimal Approach for Laparoscopic D3 Lymphadenectomy Plus Complete Mesocolic Excision (D3+CME) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer.腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫术联合完整结肠系膜切除术(D3+CME)治疗右半结肠癌的优化方法
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May;24(5):1312-1313. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5722-1. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
5
Is Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision Feasible for Transverse Colon Cancer?机器人全结肠系膜切除术对横结肠癌是否可行?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Dec;28(12):1443-1450. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0239. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
6
Laparoscopic versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Colon Cancer.腹腔镜与开腹完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的比较。
Int J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb 2;2021:8859879. doi: 10.1155/2021/8859879. eCollection 2021.
7
[Clinical analysis of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in right colectomy].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;17(3):268-71.
8
Long-term Outcomes of Single-Site Laparoscopic Colectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Comparison With Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy Using Propensity Score Matching.单部位腹腔镜完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌的长期疗效:与传统多端口腹腔镜结肠切除术使用倾向评分匹配法的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jul;60(7):664-673. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000810.
9
[Efficacy of complete mesocolic excision in radical operation for right colon cancer].全结肠系膜切除术在右半结肠癌根治术中的疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Oct 25;19(10):1101-1106.
10
Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision for Transverse Colon Cancer: Long-Term Survival Results of a Prospective Single Centre Non-Randomized Study.腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术与开腹全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌:一项前瞻性单中心非随机研究的长期生存结果
Dig Surg. 2016;33(2):114-20. doi: 10.1159/000442716. Epub 2016 Jan 7.