• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术与开腹全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌:一项前瞻性单中心非随机研究的长期生存结果

Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision for Transverse Colon Cancer: Long-Term Survival Results of a Prospective Single Centre Non-Randomized Study.

作者信息

Storli Kristian Eeg, Eide Geir Egil

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2016;33(2):114-20. doi: 10.1159/000442716. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1159/000442716
PMID:26734758
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) used in the treatment of transverse colon cancer has been questioned on the basis of the technical challenges. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium- and long-term clinical and survival outcomes after laparoscopic and open CME for transverse colon cancer and to compare the 2 approaches.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective non-randomized study of patients with prospectively registered data on open and laparoscopic CME for transverse colon cancer tumour-node-metastasis stages I-III operated on between 2007 and 2014. This was a single-centre study in a community teaching hospital. A total of 56 patients with transverse colon cancer were included, excluding those with tumours in the colonic flexures. The outcome aims were 4-year time to recurrence (TTR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Morbidity was also measured.

RESULTS

The 4-year TTR was 93.9% in the laparoscopic group and 91.3% in the open group (p = 0.71). The 4-year CSS was 97.0% in the laparoscopic group and 91.3% in the open group (p = 0.42).

LIMITATIONS

This was a prospective single-institution study with a small sample size.

CONCLUSION

Results of the study suggest that the laparoscopic CME approach might be the preferred approach for transverse colon cancer, especially regarding its benefits in terms of short-term morbidity, length of stay and oncological outcome.

摘要

背景/目的:腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术(CME)用于治疗横结肠癌时,因其技术挑战而受到质疑。本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜和开放CME治疗横结肠癌后的中长期临床和生存结果,并比较这两种方法。

方法

本研究是一项回顾性非随机研究,研究对象为2007年至2014年间接受开放和腹腔镜CME治疗的I-III期横结肠癌肿瘤-淋巴结-转移患者,其数据已前瞻性登记。这是一项在社区教学医院进行的单中心研究。共纳入56例横结肠癌患者,排除结肠弯曲处有肿瘤的患者。观察指标为4年复发时间(TTR)和癌症特异性生存(CSS)。还对发病率进行了测量。

结果

腹腔镜组4年TTR为93.9%,开放组为91.3%(p = 0.71)。腹腔镜组4年CSS为97.0%,开放组为91.3%(p = 0.42)。

局限性

这是一项前瞻性单机构研究,样本量较小。

结论

研究结果表明,腹腔镜CME方法可能是治疗横结肠癌的首选方法,特别是在短期发病率、住院时间和肿瘤学结果方面具有优势。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision for Transverse Colon Cancer: Long-Term Survival Results of a Prospective Single Centre Non-Randomized Study.腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术与开腹全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌:一项前瞻性单中心非随机研究的长期生存结果
Dig Surg. 2016;33(2):114-20. doi: 10.1159/000442716. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
2
Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision via combined medial and cranial approaches for transverse colon cancer.腹腔镜下经联合内侧和头侧入路行横结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术
Surg Today. 2017 May;47(5):643-649. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1409-2. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
3
Is Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision Feasible for Transverse Colon Cancer?机器人全结肠系膜切除术对横结肠癌是否可行?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Dec;28(12):1443-1450. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0239. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
4
[Efficacy evaluation of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer].腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌的疗效评估
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 25;20(5):545-549.
5
Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted and open complete mesocolic excision (CME) for the treatment of transverse colon cancer.腹腔镜辅助与开放全结肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗横结肠癌的短期疗效比较。
Chin Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;6(1):6. doi: 10.21037/cco.2017.01.01.
6
Long-term Outcomes of Single-Site Laparoscopic Colectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Comparison With Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy Using Propensity Score Matching.单部位腹腔镜完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌的长期疗效:与传统多端口腹腔镜结肠切除术使用倾向评分匹配法的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jul;60(7):664-673. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000810.
7
Oncological outcomes of complete versus conventional mesocolic excision in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中完整系膜切除与传统系膜切除的肿瘤学结局
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):E698-E702. doi: 10.1111/ans.14493. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
8
Modified complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.改良全结肠系膜切除术伴中央血管结扎治疗右侧结肠癌:长期结果和预后因素。
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):708-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000831.
9
Robotic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer can be performed with a morbidity profile similar to that of conventional laparoscopic colectomy.机器人全结肠系膜切除术治疗横结肠癌的发病率与传统腹腔镜结直肠切除术相似。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02249-y. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
10
An Optimal Approach for Laparoscopic D3 Lymphadenectomy Plus Complete Mesocolic Excision (D3+CME) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer.腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫术联合完整结肠系膜切除术(D3+CME)治疗右半结肠癌的优化方法
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May;24(5):1312-1313. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5722-1. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Feasibility of Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation in Complicated Colorectal Cancer.复杂结直肠癌中央血管结扎完整结肠系膜切除术的疗效与可行性
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;14(2):312-317. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01673-w. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and open colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹横结肠癌根治术的生存结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 1;38(1):111. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04414-9.
3
Laparoscopic transverse colectomy using a new articulating instrument.
使用新型关节式器械的腹腔镜横结肠切除术
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2021 Dec 15;24(4):227-229. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2021.24.4.227.
4
What is the best surgical procedure of transverse colon cancer? An evidence map and minireview.横结肠癌的最佳手术方式是什么?一项证据图谱与综述。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 May 15;13(5):391-399. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i5.391.
5
Recurrence Risk after Radical Colorectal Cancer Surgery-Less Than before, But How High Is It?结直肠癌根治术后的复发风险——低于以往,但有多高呢?
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 9;12(11):3308. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113308.
6
Laparoscopic D2 plus complete mesogastrium excision using the "enjoyable space" approach versus conventional D2 total gastrectomy for local advanced gastric cancer: short-term outcomes.腹腔镜D2加完整胃系膜切除术采用“愉悦空间”入路与传统D2全胃切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌的短期疗效
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Mar;15(1):58-69. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.85540. Epub 2019 May 29.
7
Comparing the safety, efficacy, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy in transverse colon cancer: a meta-analysis.比较腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术治疗横结肠癌的安全性、有效性及肿瘤学结局:一项荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Mar;35(3):373-386. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03516-y. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
8
Implementing complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer - mission completed?对结肠癌实施完整结肠系膜切除术——任务完成了吗?
Innov Surg Sci. 2018 Feb 10;3(1):17-29. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0042. eCollection 2018 Mar.
9
Laparoscopic Versus Open Complete Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与开腹完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2019 Dec;43(12):3179-3190. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05134-4.
10
Survival and outcomes after laparoscopic versus open curative resection for colon cancer.腹腔镜与开腹根治性结肠癌切除术的生存率及预后
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 May-Jun;39(3):137-142. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.137. Epub 2019 May 30.