• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Design Challenges of an Episode-Based Payment Model in Oncology: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model.肿瘤学中基于诊疗阶段付费模式的设计挑战:医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心肿瘤护理模式
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jul;13(7):e632-e645. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.015834. Epub 2017 May 23.
2
Association of Participation in the Oncology Care Model With Medicare Payments, Utilization, Care Delivery, and Quality Outcomes.参与肿瘤治疗模式与医疗保险支付、利用、医疗服务提供和质量结果的关联。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1829-1839. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17642.
3
Centers for medicare and medicaid services: using an episode-based payment model to improve oncology care.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心:采用基于诊疗期间的付费模式改善肿瘤护理。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):114-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002337. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
4
Variations in payment patterns for surgical care in the centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心手术护理支付模式的差异。
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.028. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
5
Costs of cancer care: a view from the centers for Medicare and Medicaid services.癌症护理成本:来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的观点。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):187-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.6116.
6
The Oncology Care Model: Perspectives From the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and Participating Oncology Practices in Academia and the Community.肿瘤护理模式:来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心以及学术和社区参与肿瘤治疗机构的观点。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2017;37:460-466. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_174909.
7
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model Halfway Through: Perspectives from Diverse Participants.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心肿瘤治疗模式进行过半:来自不同参与者的观点。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Aug 1;111(8):764-771. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz072.
8
Association Between Hospital Participation in a Medicare Bundled Payment Initiative and Payments and Quality Outcomes for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Episodes.医院参与医疗保险捆绑支付计划与下肢关节置换事件的支付及质量结果之间的关联。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1267-78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12717.
9
Secret Sauce-How Diverse Practices Succeed in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model.独门秘籍——医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心肿瘤护理模式下多元化实践的成功之道。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Dec;17(12):734-743. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00165. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
10
Specialty Payment Model Opportunities and Assessment: Oncology Model Design Report.专科支付模式机遇与评估:肿瘤学模式设计报告。
Rand Health Q. 2015 Jul 15;5(1):11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer in rural America: Improving access to clinical trials and quality of oncologic care.美国农村地区的癌症:改善临床试验的可及性和肿瘤护理质量。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Jul-Aug;75(4):341-361. doi: 10.3322/caac.70006. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
2
Race, geography, and risk of breast cancer treatment delays: A population-based study 2004-2015.种族、地理位置与乳腺癌治疗延误风险:2004-2015 年基于人群的研究
Cancer. 2023 Mar 15;129(6):925-933. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34573. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
Association of Oncologist Participation in Medicare's Oncology Care Model With Patient Receipt of Novel Cancer Therapies.肿瘤学家参与医疗保险的肿瘤治疗模式与患者接受新型癌症治疗的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2234161. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34161.
4
Black boxes and information pathways: An actor-network theory approach to breast cancer survivorship care.黑箱与信息路径:一种用于乳腺癌生存护理的行动者网络理论方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;307:115184. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115184. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
5
Oncology alternative payment models: lessons from commercial insurance.肿瘤学的替代支付模式:商业保险的经验教训。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Mar;28(3):98-100. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88835.
6
Implementation factors for patient navigation program success: a qualitative study.患者导航计划成功的实施因素:一项定性研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Dec 20;2(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00248-0.
7
Providers' mediating role for medication adherence among cancer survivors.提供者在癌症幸存者药物依从性方面的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260358. eCollection 2021.
8
Association of Participation in the Oncology Care Model With Medicare Payments, Utilization, Care Delivery, and Quality Outcomes.参与肿瘤治疗模式与医疗保险支付、利用、医疗服务提供和质量结果的关联。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1829-1839. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17642.
9
Real-World Cost of Care for Commercially Insured versus Medicare Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Who Received Guideline-Recommended Therapies.接受指南推荐治疗的商业保险与医疗保险转移性胰腺癌患者的真实世界护理成本
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2021 Jun;14(2):70-78.
10
Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices.将经济评估转化为实施循证实践的融资策略。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jun 29;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01137-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Specialty Payment Model Opportunities and Assessment: Oncology Model Design Report.专科支付模式机遇与评估:肿瘤学模式设计报告。
Rand Health Q. 2015 Jul 15;5(1):11.
2
Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医师费率表下的基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS)和替代支付模式(APM)激励措施,以及以医师为重点的支付模式标准。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Nov 4;81(214):77008-831.
3
Medicare's New Bundled Payments: Design, Strategy, and Evolution.医疗保险的新型捆绑支付:设计、策略与演变
JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):131-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18161.
4
National Health Spending In 2014: Faster Growth Driven By Coverage Expansion And Prescription Drug Spending.2014年国家医疗支出:医保覆盖范围扩大和处方药支出推动增长加速
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):150-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1194. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
Will Bundled Payments Change Health Care? Examining the Evidence Thus Far in Cardiovascular Care.捆绑支付会改变医疗保健吗?审视心血管护理领域目前的证据。
Circulation. 2015 Jun 16;131(24):2151-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010393.
6
Centers for medicare and medicaid services: using an episode-based payment model to improve oncology care.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心:采用基于诊疗期间的付费模式改善肿瘤护理。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):114-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002337. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
7
CMS--engaging multiple payers in payment reform.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心——让多个支付方参与支付改革。
JAMA. 2014 May 21;311(19):1967-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3703.
8
Maryland's all-payer approach to delivery-system reform.马里兰州针对医疗服务提供体系改革的全支付方模式。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 6;370(6):493-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1314868. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

肿瘤学中基于诊疗阶段付费模式的设计挑战:医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心肿瘤护理模式

Design Challenges of an Episode-Based Payment Model in Oncology: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model.

作者信息

Kline Ronald M, Muldoon L Daniel, Schumacher Heidi K, Strawbridge Larisa M, York Andrew W, Mortimer Laura K, Falb Alison F, Cox Katherine J, Bazell Carol, Lukens Ellen W, Kapp Mary C, Rajkumar Rahul, Bassano Amy, Conway Patrick H

机构信息

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jul;13(7):e632-e645. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.015834. Epub 2017 May 23.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2016.015834
PMID:28535101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5508445/
Abstract

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services developed the Oncology Care Model as an episode-based payment model to encourage participating practitioners to provide higher-quality, better-coordinated care at a lower cost to the nearly three-quarter million fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with cancer who receive chemotherapy each year. Episode payment models can be complex. They combine into a single benchmark price all payments for services during an episode of illness, many of which may be delivered at different times by different providers in different locations. Policy and technical decisions include the definition of the episode, including its initiation, duration, and included services; the identification of beneficiaries included in the model; and beneficiary attribution to practitioners with overall responsibility for managing their care. In addition, the calculation and risk adjustment of benchmark episode prices for the bundle of services must reflect geographic cost variations and diverse patient populations, including varying disease subtypes, medical comorbidities, changes in standards of care over time, the adoption of expensive new drugs (especially in oncology), as well as diverse practice patterns. Other steps include timely monitoring and intervention as needed to avoid shifting the attribution of beneficiaries on the basis of their expected episode expenditures as well as to ensure the provision of necessary medical services and the development of a meaningful link to quality measurement and improvement through the episode-based payment methodology. The complex and diverse nature of oncology business relationships and the specific rules and requirements of Medicare payment systems for different types of providers intensify these issues. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services believes that by sharing its approach to addressing these decisions and challenges, it may facilitate greater understanding of the model within the oncology community and provide insight to others considering the development of episode-based payment models in the commercial or government sectors.

摘要

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心制定了肿瘤护理模式,作为一种基于诊疗期间的付费模式,以鼓励参与的从业者为每年接受化疗的近75万按服务收费的医疗保险癌症受益人提供更高质量、更协调的护理,同时降低成本。基于诊疗期间的付费模式可能很复杂。它们将疾病诊疗期间的所有服务支付合并为一个单一的基准价格,其中许多服务可能由不同地点的不同提供者在不同时间提供。政策和技术决策包括诊疗期间的定义,包括其开始、持续时间和包含的服务;确定模式中包含的受益人;以及将受益人分配给负责管理其护理的从业者。此外,一揽子服务的基准诊疗期间价格的计算和风险调整必须反映地理成本差异和不同的患者群体,包括不同的疾病亚型、医疗合并症、护理标准随时间的变化、昂贵新药的采用(特别是在肿瘤学领域)以及不同的执业模式。其他步骤包括根据需要进行及时监测和干预,以避免根据受益人的预期诊疗期间支出转移受益人归属,同时确保提供必要的医疗服务,并通过基于诊疗期间的付费方法建立与质量测量和改进的有意义联系。肿瘤业务关系的复杂多样性质以及医疗保险支付系统针对不同类型提供者的具体规则和要求加剧了这些问题。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心认为,通过分享其解决这些决策和挑战的方法,可能有助于肿瘤学界对该模式有更深入的理解,并为其他考虑在商业或政府部门开发基于诊疗期间付费模式的人提供见解。