Diez Roux Ana V
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;185(11):1171-1173. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx084.
In this commentary, I reflect on the paper "Poverty and Health: Prospective Evidence From the Alameda County Study" by Haan et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 1987;125(6):989-998), which together with supporting work ushered in a surge of epidemiologic interest in the impact of social contexts on health. I discuss why the paper was influential and how the premise of this type of work influenced theories and methods in epidemiology. The paper is placed in the broader context of the nature of evidence in epidemiology and the ultimate purpose of epidemiologic inquiry.
在这篇评论中,我对哈恩等人发表的《贫困与健康:阿拉米达县研究的前瞻性证据》(《美国流行病学杂志》。1987年;125(6):989 - 998)进行反思。该论文以及相关支持性研究引发了流行病学领域对社会环境对健康影响的浓厚兴趣。我将探讨该论文具有影响力的原因,以及这类研究的前提如何影响了流行病学的理论和方法。本文将置于流行病学证据本质的更广泛背景以及流行病学探究的最终目的之中进行讨论。