Howe B J, Cooper M E, Wehby G L, Resick J M, Nidey N L, Valencia-Ramirez L C, Lopez-Palacio A M, Rivera D, Vieira A R, Weinberg S M, Marazita M L, Moreno Uribe L M
1 Department of Family Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
2 The Iowa Institute for Oral Health Research, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Dent Res. 2017 Sep;96(10):1106-1114. doi: 10.1177/0022034517709961. Epub 2017 May 23.
Although children with oral clefts have a higher risk for dental anomalies when compared with the general population, prior studies have shown conflicting results regarding their dental decay risk. Also, few studies have assessed dental decay risk in unaffected relatives of children with clefts. Thus, the question of increased risk of dental decay in individuals with oral clefts or their unaffected relatives is still open for empirical investigation. This study characterizes dental decay in the largest international cohort to date of children with nonsyndromic clefts and their relatives, as compared with controls, and it addresses whether families with oral clefts have a significantly increased risk for dental decay versus the general population. A total of 3,326 subjects were included: 639 case probands, 1,549 unaffected relatives, and 1,138 controls. Decay was identified from in-person dental examinations or intraoral photographs. Case-control differences were tested with regression analysis. No significant differences were shown in percentage decayed and filled teeth and decayed teeth in the primary dentition (dft, dt) and permanent dentition (DFT, DT) in cases versus controls. In the cleft region, no significant differences were seen in primary or permanent decay (dt, DT) when compared with controls. No difference was found with regard to cleft type and percentage dft, dt, DFT, and DT in case probands. Nonsignificant differences were found in unaffected siblings and parents versus controls (primary and permanent dentitions). Collectively, these findings indicate that individuals with nonsyndromic oral clefts and their families do not have a higher dental decay risk as compared with the general population. These results suggest that either genetic or environmental factors underlying a higher susceptibility for dental anomalies do not increase caries risk or that the seemingly higher risk for dental decay associated with increased dental anomalies in case probands may be superseded by possible greater access to dental care.
与普通人群相比,患有口腔腭裂的儿童出现牙齿异常的风险更高,然而先前的研究在其龋齿风险方面得出了相互矛盾的结果。此外,很少有研究评估腭裂儿童未受影响亲属的龋齿风险。因此,口腔腭裂患者或其未受影响亲属的龋齿风险增加这一问题仍有待实证研究。本研究对迄今为止最大的非综合征性腭裂儿童及其亲属的国际队列中的龋齿情况进行了特征描述,并与对照组进行比较,探讨了有口腔腭裂的家庭与普通人群相比是否存在显著更高的龋齿风险。总共纳入了3326名受试者:639名病例先证者、1549名未受影响的亲属和1138名对照。通过现场牙科检查或口腔内照片确定龋齿情况。采用回归分析检验病例组与对照组之间的差异。病例组与对照组在乳牙列(dft、dt)和恒牙列(DFT、DT)中龋补牙百分比和龋齿方面未显示出显著差异。在腭裂区域,与对照组相比,乳牙或恒牙龋齿(dt、DT)未发现显著差异。病例先证者在腭裂类型以及dft、dt、DFT和DT百分比方面未发现差异。未受影响的兄弟姐妹和父母与对照组(乳牙列和恒牙列)相比也未发现显著差异。总体而言,这些发现表明,与普通人群相比,非综合征性口腔腭裂患者及其家人的龋齿风险并不更高。这些结果表明,导致牙齿异常易感性较高的遗传或环境因素不会增加患龋风险,或者病例先证者中与牙齿异常增加相关的看似较高的龋齿风险可能被获得牙科护理的更多可能性所抵消。