Larruga Jose M, Marrero Patricia, Abu-Amero Khaled K, Golubenko Maria V, Cabrera Vicente M
Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Research Support General Service, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 May 23;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0964-5.
The colonization of Eurasia and Australasia by African modern humans has been explained, nearly unanimously, as the result of a quick southern coastal dispersal route through the Arabian Peninsula, the Indian subcontinent, and the Indochinese Peninsula, to reach Australia around 50 kya. The phylogeny and phylogeography of the major mitochondrial DNA Eurasian haplogroups M and N have played the main role in giving molecular genetics support to that scenario. However, using the same molecular tools, a northern route across central Asia has been invoked as an alternative that is more conciliatory with the fossil record of East Asia. Here, we assess as the Eurasian macrohaplogroup R fits in the northern path.
Haplogroup U, with a founder age around 50 kya, is one of the oldest clades of macrohaplogroup R in western Asia. The main branches of U expanded in successive waves across West, Central and South Asia before the Last Glacial Maximum. All these dispersions had rather overlapping ranges. Some of them, as those of U6 and U3, reached North Africa. At the other end of Asia, in Wallacea, another branch of macrohaplogroup R, haplogroup P, also independently expanded in the area around 52 kya, in this case as isolated bursts geographically well structured, with autochthonous branches in Australia, New Guinea, and the Philippines.
Coeval independently dispersals around 50 kya of the West Asia haplogroup U and the Wallacea haplogroup P, points to a halfway core area in southeast Asia as the most probable centre of expansion of macrohaplogroup R, what fits in the phylogeographic pattern of its ancestor, macrohaplogroup N, for which a northern route and a southeast Asian origin has been already proposed.
非洲现代人类对欧亚大陆和澳大拉西亚的殖民,几乎一致被解释为通过阿拉伯半岛、印度次大陆和印度支那半岛的快速南部沿海扩散路线的结果,大约在5万年前到达澳大利亚。欧亚大陆主要线粒体DNA单倍群M和N的系统发育和系统地理学在为该情景提供分子遗传学支持方面发挥了主要作用。然而,使用相同的分子工具,一条穿越中亚的北部路线被认为是一种更符合东亚化石记录的替代方案。在此,我们评估欧亚大陆宏单倍群R如何适应北部路线。
单倍群U,其奠基者年龄约为5万年前,是西亚宏单倍群R最古老的分支之一。U的主要分支在末次盛冰期之前在西亚、中亚和南亚相继扩张。所有这些扩散的范围相当重叠。其中一些,如U6和U3的扩散,到达了北非。在亚洲的另一端,在华莱士区,宏单倍群R的另一个分支,单倍群P,也在大约5.2万年前在该地区独立扩张,在这种情况下,是地理结构良好的孤立爆发,在澳大利亚、新几内亚和菲律宾有本地分支。
西亚单倍群U和华莱士区单倍群P在大约5万年前同时发生的独立扩散,表明东南亚是宏单倍群R最可能的扩张中心,这与它的祖先宏单倍群N的系统地理模式相符合,对于宏单倍群N,已经有人提出了一条北部路线和东南亚起源。