Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, M5G 1X8, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2017 Dec;17(6):425-439. doi: 10.1007/s40256-017-0229-0.
The development of extracorporeal devices for organ support has been a part of medical history and progression since the late 1900s. These types of technology are primarily used and developed in the field of critical care medicine. Unfractionated heparin, discovered in 1916, has really been the only consistent form of thromboprophylaxis for attenuating or even preventing the blood-biomaterial reaction that occurs when such technologies are initiated. The advent of regional anticoagulation for procedures such as continuous renal replacement therapy and plasmapheresis have certainly removed the risks of systemic heparinization and heparin effect, but the challenges of the blood-biomaterial reaction and downstream effects remain. In addition, regional anticoagulation cannot realistically be applied in a system such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation because of the high blood flow rates needed to support the patient. More recently, advances in the technology itself have resulted in smaller, more compact extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems that can-at certain times and in certain patients-run without any form of anticoagulation. However, the majority of patients on ECLS systems require some type of systemic anticoagulation; therefore, the risks of bleeding and thrombosis persist, the most devastating of which is intracranial hemorrhage. We provide a concise overview of the primary and alternate agents and monitoring used for thromboprophylaxis during use of ECLS. In addition, we explore the potential for further biomaterial and technologic developments and what they could provide when applied in the clinical arena.
体外器官支持设备的发展自 20 世纪末以来一直是医学历史和进步的一部分。这些类型的技术主要在重症监护医学领域中使用和开发。未分级肝素于 1916 年发现,一直是唯一一种一致的血栓预防形式,用于减轻甚至预防这些技术启动时发生的血液-生物材料反应。连续肾脏替代治疗和血浆置换等程序的区域抗凝的出现,当然消除了全身肝素化和肝素作用的风险,但血液-生物材料反应和下游效应的挑战仍然存在。此外,由于体外膜氧合等系统需要支持患者所需的高血流量,因此区域抗凝实际上无法应用于该系统。最近,技术本身的进步导致了更小、更紧凑的体外生命支持 (ECLS) 系统,这些系统在某些时候和某些患者中可以无需任何形式的抗凝剂运行。然而,大多数使用 ECLS 系统的患者需要某种形式的全身抗凝;因此,出血和血栓形成的风险仍然存在,其中最具破坏性的是颅内出血。我们提供了一个简明的概述,介绍了在使用 ECLS 时进行血栓预防所使用的主要和替代药物以及监测方法。此外,我们探讨了进一步的生物材料和技术发展的潜力,以及在临床应用中它们可以提供什么。