Pretty I A, Boothman N, Morris J, MacKay L, Liu Z, McGrady M, Goodwin M
School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, UK.
Public Health England, UK.
Community Dent Health. 2016 Dec;33(4):292-296. doi: 10.1922/CDH_3930Pretty05.
To assess the prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis in four city-based populations using a robust photographic method with TF index reporting; and to record the aesthetic satisfaction scores of children in all four cities.
Cross sectional epidemiological survey (surveillance).
1,904 children aged 11-14 years, in four English cities.
Two cities were served by community water fluoridation schemes supplying water at 1mg/l F. The other two cities did not have water fluoridation schemes and had low levels of fluoride naturally present.
The prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis. Scoring was undertaken using high quality digital images by a single calibrated examiner.
Data suggest that the prevalence of fluorosis at levels greater than TF2 are broadly similar to previous studies (F 10%, NF 2%), with an apparent increase in the total number of TF1 cases across both fluoridated (41%) and non-fluoridated cities (32%) with a commensurate decrease in TF0 (F 39%, NF 63%). Data suggest that the proportion of children expressing dissatisfaction with the appearance of their teeth is the same in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities although the reasons for this may differ.
The levels of fluorosis that might be considered of aesthetic concern are low and stable while the increase in TF1 may be due to an increase in self- and professionally-applied fluoride products or the increased sensitivity afforded by the digital imaging system. It is not however a public health problem or concern. Further monitoring appears justified.
采用稳健的摄影方法并报告TF指数,评估四个城市人群中氟斑牙的患病率和严重程度;记录所有四个城市儿童的美学满意度得分。
横断面流行病学调查(监测)。
来自英国四个城市的1904名11至14岁儿童。
两个城市通过社区水氟化方案供应含氟量为1mg/l的水。另外两个城市没有水氟化方案,天然存在的氟含量较低。
氟斑牙的患病率和严重程度。由一名经过校准的检查人员使用高质量数字图像进行评分。
数据表明,氟斑牙程度大于TF2的患病率与先前研究大致相似(氟化社区为10%,非氟化社区为2%),氟化城市(41%)和非氟化城市(32%)中TF1病例总数明显增加,TF0相应减少(氟化社区为39%,非氟化社区为63%)。数据表明,氟化社区和非氟化社区中对牙齿外观表示不满的儿童比例相同,尽管原因可能不同。
可能被认为在美学上令人担忧的氟斑牙水平较低且稳定,而TF1的增加可能是由于自我使用和专业使用的含氟产品增加,或者是数字成像系统提高了敏感性。然而,这不是一个公共卫生问题或关注点。进一步监测似乎是合理的。