Goldman Jennifer, Kapitza Christoph, Pettus Jeremy, Heise Tim
a School of Pharmacy , MCPHS University , Boston , MA , USA.
b Profil , Neuss , Germany.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1821-1831. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1335192. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
This article reviews pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) concepts relating to the pharmacology of basal insulin analogs. Understanding the pharmacology of currently available long-acting basal insulins and the techniques used to assess PK and PD parameters (e.g. the euglycemic clamp method) is important when considering the efficacy and safety of these agents, and can help in understanding the rationale for specific dosing strategies when tailoring therapy for a specific patient. Basal insulins such as insulin glargine 100 units (U)/mL and insulin detemir show improved PK/PD characteristics compared with the intermediate-acting NPH insulin, with a longer duration of action, a more consistent glucose-lowering effect and less prominent concentration peaks. However, more recently developed basal insulins (insulin glargine 300 U/mL, and insulin degludec 100 U/mL and 200 U/mL) have PK/PD profiles closer to the physiologic profile of endogenous basal insulin owing to a more evenly distributed, predictable and prolonged time-action profile that exceeds 24 hours and improved within-patient variability in glucose-lowering effect. The clinical implications and relevance of these PK/PD profiles is explored, including the potential effect of PK/PD parameters on glycemic control and hypoglycemia, and the timing of dosing. The improved PK/PD properties of newer longer-acting basal insulins may translate into clinical benefits for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, such as more consistent insulin levels in the blood over 24 hours, lower intra-patient variability, a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia, and more flexibility in dosing time, all of which are important to consider when choosing a basal insulin regimen.
本文综述了与基础胰岛素类似物药理学相关的药代动力学(PK)和药效动力学(PD)概念。在考虑这些药物的疗效和安全性时,了解目前可用的长效基础胰岛素的药理学以及用于评估PK和PD参数的技术(如正常血糖钳夹法)很重要,这有助于理解为特定患者量身定制治疗方案时特定给药策略的基本原理。与中效NPH胰岛素相比,诸如100单位(U)/毫升的甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素等基础胰岛素显示出改善的PK/PD特性,作用持续时间更长,降糖效果更一致,浓度峰值不那么突出。然而,最近开发的基础胰岛素(300 U/mL的甘精胰岛素、100 U/mL和200 U/mL的德谷胰岛素)具有更接近内源性基础胰岛素生理特征的PK/PD曲线,这是因为其时间作用曲线分布更均匀、可预测且延长超过24小时,并且患者内降糖效果的变异性得到改善。本文探讨了这些PK/PD曲线的临床意义和相关性,包括PK/PD参数对血糖控制和低血糖的潜在影响以及给药时间。新型长效基础胰岛素改善的PK/PD特性可能会为1型和2型糖尿病患者带来临床益处,例如24小时内血液中的胰岛素水平更稳定、患者内变异性更低、夜间低血糖风险降低以及给药时间更灵活,在选择基础胰岛素治疗方案时,所有这些都是需要考虑的重要因素。