• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三孔腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB):手术技术及三年随访

Three-Port Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB): Surgical Technique and Three Years Follow-Up.

作者信息

Consalvo Vincenzo, Salsano Vincenzo, Sarno Gerardo

机构信息

Bariatric Surgery Department, Clinique Clementville, Montpellier, France.

General Surgery Department San Giovanni Di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona Salerno, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Technol Int. 2017 Jul 25;30:93-96.

PMID:28537646
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adjustable Gastric Banding (AGB) is an effective and reversible bariatric procedure, which is usually performed using a mini-invasive laparoscopic approach. The majority of surgeons use a five-trocar technique, while AGB can be safely carried out with only three trocars. The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of three-trocar laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to the results obtained with the conventional technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our database was carried out to assess the number of LAGB performed with the conventional five-port technique and the number of LAGB performed with the three-port approach. The complication rate and the weight loss of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

From May 2006 to February 2012, 395 patients underwent LAGB under our care. The conventional technique was performed in 198 patients, while the three ports approach was used in 197 subjects. Complications rate was similar in the two groups and no death was recorded. There was no statistical difference in operative time and weight loss between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LAGB can be safely performed with a three-port approach. This technique reduces the number of scars and the surgical trauma without differences in weight loss or complication rate.

摘要

背景

可调节胃束带术(AGB)是一种有效且可逆的减肥手术,通常采用微创腹腔镜手术方式进行。大多数外科医生采用五套管针技术,而AGB仅用三个套管针即可安全实施。我们研究的目的是比较三套管针腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)与传统技术的手术效果。

材料与方法

对我们的数据库进行回顾性分析,以评估采用传统五端口技术实施的LAGB数量以及采用三端口方法实施的LAGB数量。比较两组的并发症发生率和体重减轻情况。

结果

从2006年5月至2012年2月,395例患者在我们的治疗下接受了LAGB手术。198例患者采用传统技术,197例患者采用三端口方法。两组的并发症发生率相似,无死亡记录。两组之间的手术时间和体重减轻情况无统计学差异。

结论

LAGB采用三端口方法可安全实施。该技术减少了疤痕数量和手术创伤,在体重减轻或并发症发生率方面无差异。

相似文献

1
Three-Port Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB): Surgical Technique and Three Years Follow-Up.三孔腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB):手术技术及三年随访
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Jul 25;30:93-96.
2
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with gastric plication: midterm outcomes in terms of weight loss and short term complications.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术与腹腔镜可调节胃束带术联合胃折叠术:减肥效果及短期并发症的中期结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Feb;13(2):267-272. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
3
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in an ambulatory surgery center.在门诊手术中心进行腹腔镜可调节胃束带术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May-Jun;4(3 Suppl):S56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.04.008.
4
An update on 73 US obese pediatric patients treated with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: comorbidity resolution and compliance data.73例接受腹腔镜可调节胃束带术治疗的美国肥胖儿科患者的最新情况:合并症缓解及依从性数据
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jan;43(1):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.035.
5
Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - 8 years experience.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术的术后结果——8年经验
Obes Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):427-34. doi: 10.1381/096089203765887787.
6
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure for failed gastric banding: lessons from 300 consecutive cases.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为胃束带术失败后的修正手术:来自300例连续病例的经验教训。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.045. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
7
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) with gastric plication: short-term results and comparison with LAGB alone and sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)联合胃折叠术:短期结果及与单纯LAGB和袖状胃切除术的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
8
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the placement of an adjustable gastric band: a large cohort comparison.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗胃旁路术患者的疗效比较:一项大样本队列研究
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):686-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
9
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) Plus Anterior Fundoplication Versus LAGB Alone: A Prospective Comparative Study.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)联合前壁胃底折叠术与单纯LAGB的前瞻性对比研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Jun;26(3):216-20. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000275.
10
Single and multiple incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a matched comparison.单切口与多切口腹腔镜可调胃束带术:一项匹配对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2012 Nov;22(11):1695-700. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0704-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Metabolic syndrome and liver disease in the era of bariatric surgery: What you need to know!减重手术时代的代谢综合征与肝脏疾病:你需要了解的内容!
World J Hepatol. 2020 Oct 27;12(10):709-721. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i10.709.