Craig Christopher K, Holmes James H, Carter Jeffery E
Christopher K. Craig practices in the burn center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C. James H. Holmes IV is an associate professor of surgery at Wake Forest University School of Medicine and medical director of the burn center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center. Jeffery E. Carter is an assistant professor of surgery and assistant residency program director at Wake Forest University School of Medicine, associate director of the burn center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, and medical director of the Wake Forest Innovations Center for Applied Learning. The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
JAAPA. 2017 Jun;30(6):35-38. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000516349.73631.c2.
As the United States faces a predicted physician shortage over the next 2 decades, physician assistants (PAs) and NPs are expected to fill the void. At the same time, because education is expensive, student loan and tuition increases have many potential applicants assessing differences in reimbursement and wondering about their return on investment (ROI). An analysis compared PA and NP salaries by incorporating national salary data, federal income tax, and student loans for a comparative analysis of each career pathway.
Salaries were abstracted from the 2012 Bureau of Labor Statistics database. The net present value (NPV) of PA and NP salaries was calculated with a 5% discount rate. Principal and interest for student loans was calculated at a 6% interest fixed-rate loan over 30 years. NPVs were then compared with projected ROI at retirement age. Relative career values were also given to each career choice, based on a retirement age of 65 years, which translates to about 41 years of employment for both PAs and NPs.
PAs' and NPs' educational loans both equalled $129,484 on total repayment. The median annual salary of a PA was $90,930 and $89,960 for an NP. PA data yielded a 5% NPV of $781,323 compared with $764,348 for NPs. Of note, the 5% NPV of a 4-year nursing degree is $728,436.
PAs have a slightly higher ROI compared with NPs. These findings may change due to adjustments in nursing training models. Many PA programs allow matriculation immediately after obtaining a bachelor's degree. NP schools often require nursing experience before entering their program. Some schools are considering an accelerated NP program, allowing immediate matriculation after obtaining a bachelor's degree. Because many NP programs have become doctoral degrees, the increased duration of training, higher tuition, and fewer years worked before retirement lower the overall NP ROI. A similar reduction in ROI was considered marginal in PAs who attend residency programs-though these programs are not required for PAs to practice. Comparison of an RN with a 4-year degree to an NP shows little increase in ROI. If interest rates rise, it will become fiscally preferable to remain in a nursing position. Other intangible qualities exist and need further research (for example, weighing the financial aspects with lifestyle or professional satisfaction).
随着美国预计在未来20年面临医生短缺,医师助理(PAs)和执业护士(NPs)有望填补这一空缺。与此同时,由于教育成本高昂,学生贷款和学费上涨让许多潜在申请者在评估报销差异,并思考他们的投资回报率(ROI)。一项分析通过纳入全国薪资数据、联邦所得税和学生贷款,对每个职业路径进行比较分析,比较了医师助理和执业护士的薪资。
薪资数据取自2012年劳工统计局数据库。医师助理和执业护士薪资的净现值(NPV)以5%的贴现率计算。学生贷款的本金和利息按30年期6%的固定利率贷款计算。然后将净现值与退休年龄时的预计投资回报率进行比较。基于65岁的退休年龄,也为每个职业选择赋予了相对职业价值,这意味着医师助理和执业护士的就业年限约为41年。
医师助理和执业护士的教育贷款总还款额均为129,484美元。医师助理的年薪中位数为90,930美元,执业护士为89,960美元。医师助理的数据得出5%的净现值为781,323美元,而执业护士为764,348美元。值得注意的是,四年制护理学位的5%净现值为728,436美元。
与执业护士相比,医师助理的投资回报率略高。由于护理培训模式的调整,这些发现可能会改变。许多医师助理项目允许在获得学士学位后立即入学。执业护士学校通常要求在进入项目前有护理经验。一些学校正在考虑加速执业护士项目,允许在获得学士学位后立即入学。由于许多执业护士项目已成为博士学位,培训时间延长、学费上涨以及退休前工作年限减少降低了执业护士的总体投资回报率。对于参加住院医师项目的医师助理来说,投资回报率的类似降低被认为是微不足道的——尽管这些项目并非医师助理执业所必需。将拥有四年制学位的注册护士与执业护士进行比较,投资回报率几乎没有增加。如果利率上升,继续从事护理工作在财务上会更可取。还存在其他无形因素,需要进一步研究(例如,在财务方面与生活方式或职业满意度进行权衡)。