Mengual Ximo, Kerr Peter, Norrbom Allen L, Barr Norman B, Lewis Matthew L, Stapelfeldt Anna M, Scheffer Sonja J, Woods Patrick, Islam Md-Sajedul, Korytkowski Cheslavo A, Uramoto Keiko, Rodriguez Erick J, Sutton Bruce D, Nolazco Norma, Steck Gary J, Gaimari Stephen
Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany; Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, c/o Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 168, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA.
California State Collection of Arthropods, Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch, California Department of Food and Agriculture, 3294 Meadowview Rd., Sacramento, CA 95832-1448, USA.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017 Aug;113:84-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 21.
Current hypotheses of relationship among the species of the fruit fly genera Anastrepha and Toxotrypana are tested using sequence data from six DNA regions: the mitochondrial regions 16S, CAD, and COI, and the nuclear regions EF1a, PER, and PGD. DNA sequences were obtained from 146 species of Anastrepha, representing 19 of the 21 species groups as well as five of the six clades of the robusta group, and four species of Toxotrypana in addition to species of Hexachaeta, Pseudophorellia, Alujamyia, and 13 other tephritid genera used as outgroups. The results indicate that Hexachaeta is more closely related to the Molynocoelia group than to Toxotrypana and Anastrepha, and it is removed from the tribe Toxotrypanini. The group Anastrepha+Toxotrypana and the genus Toxotrypana are strongly supported as monophyletic, consistent with previous studies, but Toxotrypana arises within Anastrepha, confirming that Anastrepha as currently defined is paraphyletic. The placement of Toxotrypana within Anastrepha is clearly defined for the first time with high support, as the sister group to the cryptostrepha clade of the robusta group of Anastrepha. Within Anastrepha, the daciformis, dentata, leptozona, raveni, and striata species groups are highly supported clades. The serpentina group is recognized with lower support, and the fraterculus and pseudoparallela groups are supported with minor alterations. The robusta group is resolved as polyphyletic, but four of the six species clades within it are recovered monophyletic (one clade is not represented and another is represented by one species). The punctata and panamensis groups are resolved together in a clade. At least some species of the mucronota group are related, however this group requires further study. The benjamini, grandis, and spatulata groups appear to be polyphyletic. Relationships among the species groups are generally poorly resolved, with the following exceptions: (1) the lineage including Toxotrypana, the cryptostrepha clade, and the tripunctata group; (2) the sister group relationship of the daciformis+dentata groups; (3) a clade comprising the punctata and panamensis groups; and (4) the large clade comprising the pseudoparallela+spatulata+ramosa+grandis+serpentina+striata+fraterculus groups.
利用来自六个DNA区域的序列数据,对果实蝇属按实蝇属(Anastrepha)和锥实蝇属(Toxotrypana)物种之间的关系的当前假说进行了检验:线粒体区域16S、CAD和COI,以及核区域EF1a、PER和PGD。DNA序列取自146种按实蝇,代表了21个物种组中的19个以及粗壮按实蝇组六个进化枝中的五个,还包括四种锥实蝇,此外还有六带实蝇属(Hexachaeta)、伪小条实蝇属(Pseudophorellia)、阿鲁贾实蝇属(Alujamyia)的物种以及用作外类群的其他13个实蝇科属的物种。结果表明,六带实蝇与莫利诺实蝇组(Molynocoelia group)的关系比与锥实蝇属和按实蝇属的关系更密切,因此将其从锥实蝇族(Toxotrypanini)中移除。按实蝇属+锥实蝇属组合以及锥实蝇属被强烈支持为单系类群,这与之前的研究一致,但锥实蝇属出现在按实蝇属内部,证实了当前定义的按实蝇属是并系的。首次明确且得到高度支持地确定了锥实蝇属在按实蝇属中的位置,即作为按实蝇属粗壮按实蝇组隐条按实蝇进化枝的姐妹群。在按实蝇属内,梨形按实蝇、齿形按实蝇、细带按实蝇、拉氏按实蝇和条纹按实蝇物种组是得到高度支持的进化枝。蛇形按实蝇组得到的支持较低,兄弟按实蝇组和拟平行按实蝇组在有微小改动的情况下得到支持。粗壮按实蝇组被解析为多系类群,但其六个物种进化枝中的四个被恢复为单系类群(一个进化枝未被代表,另一个进化枝仅由一个物种代表)。斑点按实蝇组和巴拿马按实蝇组在一个进化枝中被解析在一起。然而,至少一些尖突按实蝇组的物种是相关的,不过这个组需要进一步研究。本杰明按实蝇组、大按实蝇组和匙形按实蝇组似乎是多系的。物种组之间的关系总体上解析得很差,但有以下例外:(1)包括锥实蝇属、隐条按实蝇进化枝和三点按实蝇组的谱系;(2)梨形按实蝇+齿形按实蝇组的姐妹群关系;(3)由斑点按实蝇组和巴拿马按实蝇组组成的一个进化枝;(4)由拟平行按实蝇+匙形按实蝇+分枝按实蝇+大按实蝇+蛇形按实蝇+条纹按实蝇+兄弟按实蝇组组成的大进化枝。