Chen Ying-Ying, Zhang Jia-He, Zhang Wan, Yang Zi-Ke, Luo Rong-Cheng, Kang Shi-Jun
Cancer Center, Traditional Chinese Medicine-Integrated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510315, China.E-mail:
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017 May 20;37(5):622-627. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.05.09.
To evaluate the association of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) with the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer and compare the prognostic value of CAR with other inflammation-based prognostic scoring systems.
We retrospectively evaluated 163 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients in Nanfang Hospital between January, 2007 and December, 2014. All recommended cutoff values of the clinicopathological factors were defined using receiver- operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. We evaluated the prognostic value of CAR in comparison with Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with the area under the ROC curve. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model were performed to identify the factors closely associated with overall survival of the patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival curves between patients with a high CAR and those with a low CAR.
The recommended cutoff value of CAR was 0.132. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test demonstrated a significant difference in the overall survival between patients with a low CAR (<0.132) and those with a high CAR (≥0.132) (2157.0∓395.3 vs 1661.0∓136.4 days, P<0.001). The area under the ROC curve of CAR, NLR and GPS was 0.656, 0.550 and 0.642, respectively, indicating a better prognostic value of CAR. Univariate analyses showed that age, C-reactive protein, albumin, CAR, NLR, GPS, platelet, TMN stage, Dukes stage and chemotherapy regimens were associated with the overall survival of the patients (P<0.05). Multivariate analyses showed that TMN stage [HR=1.689 (95%CI: 1.146-2.488), P=0.008] and Dukes stage [HR=2.447 (95%CI: 1.349-4.441), P=0.003] were associated with the overall survival of the patients.
Similar to the previously reported inflammation-based prognostic systems (GPS and NLR), CAR is useful for predicting the survival of patients with colorectal cancer and can be complementary to the two prognostic scoring systems.
评估C反应蛋白/白蛋白比值(CAR)与结直肠癌患者预后的相关性,并比较CAR与其他基于炎症的预后评分系统的预后价值。
我们回顾性评估了2007年1月至2014年12月在南方医院新诊断的163例结直肠癌患者。所有临床病理因素的推荐临界值均通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定。我们通过ROC曲线下面积评估CAR与格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)和中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值(NLR)相比的预后价值。使用Cox比例风险模型进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定与患者总生存密切相关的因素。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较高CAR患者和低CAR患者的总生存曲线。
CAR的推荐临界值为0.132。Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验显示,低CAR(<0.132)患者和高CAR(≥0.132)患者的总生存存在显著差异(2157.0±395.3天对1661.0±136.4天,P<0.001)。CAR、NLR和GPS的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.656、0.550和0.642,表明CAR具有更好的预后价值。单因素分析显示,年龄、C反应蛋白、白蛋白、CAR、NLR、GPS、血小板、TMN分期、Dukes分期和化疗方案与患者的总生存相关(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,TMN分期[HR=1.689(95%CI:1.146-2.488),P=0.008]和Dukes分期[HR=2.447(95%CI:...
与先前报道的基于炎症的预后系统(GPS和NLR)类似,CAR可用于预测结直肠癌患者的生存,并且可以补充这两种预后评分系统。 (注:原文中“95%CI: 1.略部分翻译时按格式保留了省略号,实际使用时应补充完整数据)