• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“自己动手”进行脑部刺激的社会背景:神经黑客、生物黑客和生活黑客。

The Social Context of "Do-It-Yourself" Brain Stimulation: Neurohackers, Biohackers, and Lifehackers.

作者信息

Wexler Anna

机构信息

Department of Science, Technology and Society, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 10;11:224. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00224. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00224
PMID:28539877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5423946/
Abstract

The "do-it-yourself" (DIY) brain stimulation movement began in earnest in late 2011, when lay individuals began building stimulation devices and applying low levels of electricity to their heads for self-improvement purposes. To date, scholarship on the home use of brain stimulation has focused on characterizing the practices of users via quantitative and qualitative studies, and on analyzing related ethical and regulatory issues. In this perspective piece, however, I take the opposite approach: rather than viewing the home use of brain stimulation on its own, I argue that it must be understood within the context of other DIY and citizen science movements. Seen in this light, the home use of brain stimulation is only a small part of the "neurohacking" movement, which is comprised of individuals attempting to optimize their brains to achieve enhanced performance. Neurohacking itself is an offshoot of the "life hacking" (or "quantified self") movement, in which individuals self-track minute aspects of their daily lives in order to enhance productivity or performance. Additionally, the home or DIY use of brain stimulation is in many ways parallel to the DIY Biology (or "biohacking") movement, which seeks to democratize tools of scientific experimentation. Here, I describe the place of the home use of brain stimulation with regard to neurohackers, lifehackers, and biohackers, and suggest that a policy approach for the home use of brain stimulation should have an appreciation both of individual motivations as well as the broader social context of the movement itself.

摘要

“自己动手做”(DIY)脑刺激运动于2011年末正式兴起,当时一些非专业人士开始制作刺激设备,并将低强度电流施加于自己头部,以达到自我提升的目的。迄今为止,关于在家中使用脑刺激的学术研究主要集中在通过定量和定性研究来描述使用者的行为,以及分析相关的伦理和监管问题。然而,在这篇观点文章中,我采取了相反的方法:我认为不能孤立地看待在家中使用脑刺激这一现象,而必须将其置于其他DIY和公民科学运动的背景下来理解。从这个角度来看,在家中使用脑刺激只是“神经黑客”运动的一小部分,该运动由一些试图优化大脑以提高表现的个人组成。神经黑客本身是“生活黑客”(或“自我量化”)运动的一个分支——在“生活黑客”运动中,人们会自我追踪日常生活中的细微方面,以提高生产力或表现。此外,在家中或DIY方式使用脑刺激在很多方面与DIY生物学(或“生物黑客”)运动类似,后者旨在使科学实验工具更加普及。在这里,我描述了在家中使用脑刺激在神经黑客、生活黑客和生物黑客中的地位,并建议针对在家中使用脑刺激的政策应既考虑个人动机,也考虑该运动本身更广泛的社会背景。

相似文献

1
The Social Context of "Do-It-Yourself" Brain Stimulation: Neurohackers, Biohackers, and Lifehackers.“自己动手”进行脑部刺激的社会背景:神经黑客、生物黑客和生活黑客。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 10;11:224. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00224. eCollection 2017.
2
The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposals.自行脑部刺激的实践:对伦理考量和监管建议的影响。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Apr;42(4):211-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102704. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
3
Recurrent themes in the history of the home use of electrical stimulation: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and the medical battery (1870-1920).家用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和医疗电池的历史上反复出现的主题:(1870-1920 年)。
Brain Stimul. 2017 Mar-Apr;10(2):187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.081. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
4
Early adopters of the magical thinking cap: a study on do-it-yourself (DIY) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) user community.神奇思维帽的早期采用者:一项关于自助经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)用户群体的研究。
J Law Biosci. 2015 Jun 2;2(2):292-335. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv017. eCollection 2015 Jul.
5
Pioneering neurohackers: between egocentric human enhancement and altruistic sacrifice.开创性的神经黑客:在以自我为中心的人类增强与利他主义牺牲之间
Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 25;17:1188066. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1188066. eCollection 2023.
6
The challenge of crafting policy for do-it-yourself brain stimulation.为自主式脑刺激制定政策面临的挑战。
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):410-2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101458. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
7
A pragmatic analysis of the regulation of consumer transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) devices in the United States.美国消费者经颅直流电刺激(TDCS)设备监管的务实分析。
J Law Biosci. 2015 Oct 12;2(3):669-696. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv039. eCollection 2015 Nov.
8
Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study.应对新冠病毒疫情期间生物安全问题的自制科学:一项人种志与访谈研究
Biosocieties. 2023 Mar 28:1-22. doi: 10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2.
9
Mapping the Landscape of Do-it-Yourself Medicine.描绘自助医疗的全景。
Citiz Sci. 2022;7(1). doi: 10.5334/cstp.553. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
Human enhancement through the lens of experimental and speculative neurotechnologies.透过实验性和推测性神经技术视角看人类增强。
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2019 Oct;1(4):361-372. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.179. Epub 2019 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Invasive Brain-Computer Interface for Communication: A Scoping Review.用于交流的侵入性脑机接口:一项范围综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 24;15(4):336. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15040336.
2
Stakeholder perspectives on non-invasive brain stimulation.利益相关者对非侵入性脑刺激的看法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79118-3.
3
When Two Become One: Singular Duos and the Neuroethical Frontiers of Brain-to-Brain Interfaces.当二者合而为一:独特的二元组合与脑对脑接口的神经伦理前沿
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Apr 12;33(4):1-13. doi: 10.1017/S0963180124000197.
4
Pioneering neurohackers: between egocentric human enhancement and altruistic sacrifice.开创性的神经黑客:在以自我为中心的人类增强与利他主义牺牲之间
Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 25;17:1188066. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1188066. eCollection 2023.
5
An Educational Program for Remote Training and Supervision of Home-Based Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness.基于家庭的经颅电刺激的远程培训和监督的教育计划:可行性和初步效果。
Neuromodulation. 2024 Jun;27(4):636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.04.477. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
6
[Cybersecurity of brain-computer interfaces].[脑机接口的网络安全]
Int Cybersecur Law Rev. 2022;3(1):191-243. doi: 10.1365/s43439-022-00046-x. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Reverse effect of home-use binaural beats brain stimulation.家用双耳节拍脑刺激的逆向效应。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 8;13(1):11079. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38313-4.
8
Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study.应对新冠病毒疫情期间生物安全问题的自制科学:一项人种志与访谈研究
Biosocieties. 2023 Mar 28:1-22. doi: 10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2.
9
Mapping the Landscape of Do-it-Yourself Medicine.描绘自助医疗的全景。
Citiz Sci. 2022;7(1). doi: 10.5334/cstp.553. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
The Promissory Visions of DIYbio: Reimaging Science from the Fringe.生物DIY的美好愿景:从边缘重塑科学
Sci Cult (Lond). 2022 Jan 17;31(3):287-310. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2028135. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
A Maker Movement for Health: A New Paradigm for Health Innovation.健康领域的创客运动:健康创新的新范式。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Feb 1;171(2):107-108. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3747.
2
A pragmatic analysis of the regulation of consumer transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) devices in the United States.美国消费者经颅直流电刺激(TDCS)设备监管的务实分析。
J Law Biosci. 2015 Oct 12;2(3):669-696. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv039. eCollection 2015 Nov.
3
Early adopters of the magical thinking cap: a study on do-it-yourself (DIY) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) user community.神奇思维帽的早期采用者:一项关于自助经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)用户群体的研究。
J Law Biosci. 2015 Jun 2;2(2):292-335. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv017. eCollection 2015 Jul.
4
The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery.量化自我:大数据科学和生物发现的根本性颠覆
Big Data. 2013 Jun;1(2):85-99. doi: 10.1089/big.2012.0002.
5
Placebo effects in cognitive training.认知训练中的安慰剂效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7470-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601243113. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
6
Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times.自制生物学与电子垃圾黑客行为:不稳定时期的一种示威政治。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Feb;26(2):179-194. doi: 10.1177/0963662516647348. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
An open letter concerning do-it-yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulation.一封关于经颅直流电刺激自助使用者的公开信。
Ann Neurol. 2016 Jul;80(1):1-4. doi: 10.1002/ana.24689.
8
A Patient-Designed Do-It-Yourself Mobile Technology System for Diabetes: Promise and Challenges for a New Era in Medicine.一种由患者设计的糖尿病自助移动技术系统:医学新时代的前景与挑战
JAMA. 2016 Apr 12;315(14):1447-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1903.
9
There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervåg and Hulme (2015).没有令人信服的证据表明工作记忆训练无效:对梅尔比-勒尔瓦格和休姆(2015年)的回应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):331-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0967-4.
10
The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposals.自行脑部刺激的实践:对伦理考量和监管建议的影响。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Apr;42(4):211-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102704. Epub 2015 Aug 31.