• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体差异变量与面试中伪装行为的发生及有效性

Individual Difference Variables and the Occurrence and Effectiveness of Faking Behavior in Interviews.

作者信息

Buehl Anne-Kathrin, Melchers Klaus G

机构信息

Institut für Psychologie und Pädagogik, Universität UlmUlm, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 May 10;8:686. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00686. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00686
PMID:28539895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5423981/
Abstract

There is widespread fear that applicants can fake during selection interviews and that this impairs the quality of selection decisions. Several theories assume that faking occurrence is influenced by personality and attitudes, which together influence applicants' motivation to show faking behavior. However, for faking behavior to be effective, interviewees also need certain skills and abilities. To investigate the impact of several relevant individual difference variables on faking behavior and interview success, we conducted two studies. In Study 1, we surveyed 222 individuals to assess different personality variables, attitude toward faking, cognitive ability, self-reported faking behavior, and success in previous interviews, and in Study 2, we assessed cognitive ability, social skills, faking behavior, and interview performance in an interview simulation with 108 participants. Taken together, personality, as well as attitude toward faking, influenced who showed faking behavior in an interview, but there was no evidence for the assumed moderating effect of cognitive ability or social skills on interview success.

摘要

人们普遍担心求职者在选拔面试中会伪装,而这会损害选拔决策的质量。几种理论认为,伪装行为的发生受个性和态度的影响,个性和态度共同影响求职者表现出伪装行为的动机。然而,为了使伪装行为有效,受访者还需要具备一定的技能和能力。为了研究几个相关个体差异变量对伪装行为和面试成功的影响,我们进行了两项研究。在研究1中,我们调查了222个人,以评估不同的个性变量、对伪装的态度、认知能力、自我报告的伪装行为以及之前面试中的成功情况;在研究2中,我们在一个有108名参与者的面试模拟中评估了认知能力、社交技能、伪装行为和面试表现。总体而言,个性以及对伪装的态度影响了谁在面试中表现出伪装行为,但没有证据表明认知能力或社交技能对面试成功有假定的调节作用。

相似文献

1
Individual Difference Variables and the Occurrence and Effectiveness of Faking Behavior in Interviews.个体差异变量与面试中伪装行为的发生及有效性
Front Psychol. 2017 May 10;8:686. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00686. eCollection 2017.
2
An Investigation of Situational and Dispositional Antecedents of Faking Intentions in Selection Interviews.选拔面试中伪装意图的情境和性格前因调查。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 27;11:2034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02034. eCollection 2020.
3
The "g" in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection.“伪装”中的“g”:对用于求职者选拔的人格自我报告量表有效性的双重思考
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 13;9:2153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02153. eCollection 2018.
4
The Psychometric Costs of Applicants' Faking: Examining Measurement Invariance and Retest Correlations Across Response Conditions.求职者伪装的心理测量成本:检验不同反应条件下的测量不变性和重测相关性。
J Pers Assess. 2017 Sep-Oct;99(5):510-523. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1285781. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
5
To Fake or Not to Fake: Antecedents to Interview Faking, Warning Instructions, and Its Impact on Applicant Reactions.造假与否:面试造假的前因、警示说明及其对求职者反应的影响
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 15;7:1771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01771. eCollection 2016.
6
Faking to fit in: Applicants' response strategies to match organizational culture.伪装以适应:应聘者应对组织文化的策略。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Feb;105(2):130-145. doi: 10.1037/apl0000431. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
7
Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.自我报告式人格测试中伪装行为的校正
Scand J Psychol. 2015 Oct;56(5):582-91. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12231. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.申请人在实际人员选拔中的反应和造假。
Scand J Psychol. 2011 Aug;52(4):376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00892.x.
9
Measuring faking in the employment interview: development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale.衡量求职面试中的伪装行为:面试伪装行为量表的编制与验证
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1638-56. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1638.
10
Individual differences in faking integrity tests.伪装正直测试中的个体差异。
Psychol Rep. 2002 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):691-702. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.91.3.691.

引用本文的文献

1
Shake and Fake: the Role of Interview Anxiety in Deceptive Impression Management.摇摆与伪装:面试焦虑在欺骗性印象管理中的作用
J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(5):829-840. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09708-1. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
2
An Investigation of Situational and Dispositional Antecedents of Faking Intentions in Selection Interviews.选拔面试中伪装意图的情境和性格前因调查。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 27;11:2034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02034. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Once an Impression Manager, Always an Impression Manager? Antecedents of Honest and Deceptive Impression Management Use and Variability across Multiple Job Interviews.一朝成为印象管理者,便永远是印象管理者?诚实与欺骗性印象管理的前因及在多次求职面试中的变化
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 24;8:29. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00029. eCollection 2017.
2
To Fake or Not to Fake: Antecedents to Interview Faking, Warning Instructions, and Its Impact on Applicant Reactions.造假与否:面试造假的前因、警示说明及其对求职者反应的影响
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 15;7:1771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01771. eCollection 2016.
3
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
4
The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality.人格的大六因素问卷(HEXACO-60):一种简短的人格主要维度测量工具。
J Pers Assess. 2009 Jul;91(4):340-5. doi: 10.1080/00223890902935878.
5
What you see may not be what you get: relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance.所见未必所得:自我呈现策略与面试和工作绩效评价之间的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1394-411. doi: 10.1037/a0016532.
6
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
7
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
8
Measuring faking in the employment interview: development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale.衡量求职面试中的伪装行为:面试伪装行为量表的编制与验证
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1638-56. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1638.
9
Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection.人格测量、伪装与就业选拔。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1270-85. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1270.
10
The moderating role of subordinate political skill on supervisors' impressions of subordinate ingratiation and ratings of subordinate interpersonal facilitation.下属政治技能对上级对下属逢迎行为的印象及下属人际促进能力评级的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):848-55. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.848.