Truong David T, Bui Minh-Thuy, Memon Pauras, Cavanagh H Dwight
Department of Ophthalmology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, USA.
J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;6(6). doi: 10.4172/2155-9570.1000498. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
To review the epidemiology, risk factors, microbiologic spectrum, and treatment of microbial keratitis during a five-year period at an urban public hospital with comparison to similar findings a decade earlier at the same hospital.
Retrospective chart review in the 5-year interval 2009 through 2014 compared to previously reported cases 2000 through 2004 [Eye & Contact Lens 33(1): 45-49, 2007]. Comparative primary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), risk factors, culture and sensitivities, treatment, and complication rates.
318 eyes with microbial keratitis were identified. Contact lens wear, ocular trauma, and ocular surface diseases were the most common risk factors. The culture and recovery rates were 73% and 66% respectively. Gram-positive organisms represented 46%, gram-negative organisms 39%, fungal organisms 15%, and Acanthamoeba <1% of corneal isolates. No common corneal pathogens were resistant to aminoglycosides or vancomycin. 48% of cases were initially treated with fortified antibiotics, 43% with fluoroquinolone monotherapy, and 6% with antifungals. 40% of cases received inpatient treatment. At resolution, average BCVA was 20/82 [logMAR 0.61] with 8% of cases resulting in light perception or worse vision. The perforation rate was 8%. 6% of cases underwent urgent penetrating keratoplasty and 4% of cases underwent urgent enucleation or evisceration. Compared to the prior study, significant differences were: (1) lower culture but higher recovery rates, (2) lower admission rate, (3) more contact lens-related cases of ulcers, (4) lower resistance of coagulase-negative to aminoglycoside antibiotics, (5) improved BCVA at resolution, and (6) lower associated complication rates.
Microbial keratitis remains a clinical challenge in the urban public hospital setting. In the past ten years, epidemiology has shifted towards greater contact lens wear with more Pseudomonal infections. Visual outcomes have not worsened despite a shift away from routine culture and inpatient care to fluoroquinolone monotherapy and outpatient management.
回顾一家城市公立医院五年期间微生物性角膜炎的流行病学、危险因素、微生物谱及治疗情况,并与该医院十年前的类似研究结果进行比较。
对2009年至2014年这五年间的病历进行回顾性分析,并与2000年至2004年之前报告的病例进行比较[《眼与隐形眼镜》33(1): 45 - 49, 2007]。比较的主要观察指标包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、危险因素、培养及药敏结果、治疗方法及并发症发生率。
共确诊318例微生物性角膜炎患者。佩戴隐形眼镜、眼外伤及眼表疾病是最常见的危险因素。培养阳性率和痊愈率分别为73%和66%。革兰阳性菌占角膜分离株的46%,革兰阴性菌占39%,真菌占15%,棘阿米巴占不到1%。没有常见的角膜病原体对氨基糖苷类或万古霉素耐药。48%的病例最初采用强化抗生素治疗,43%采用氟喹诺酮单药治疗,6%采用抗真菌药物治疗。40%的病例接受了住院治疗。病情缓解时,平均BCVA为20/82[logMAR 0.61],8%的病例最终视力为光感或更差。穿孔率为8%。6%的病例接受了紧急穿透性角膜移植术,4%的病例接受了紧急眼球摘除术或眼内容剜除术。与之前的研究相比,显著差异有:(1)培养阳性率降低但痊愈率升高;(2)住院率降低;(3)与隐形眼镜相关的溃疡病例增多;(4)凝固酶阴性菌对氨基糖苷类抗生素的耐药性降低;(5)病情缓解时BCVA改善;(6)相关并发症发生率降低。
在城市公立医院环境中,微生物性角膜炎仍然是一项临床挑战。在过去十年中,流行病学情况已转向更多佩戴隐形眼镜及更多铜绿假单胞菌感染。尽管从常规培养和住院治疗转向氟喹诺酮单药治疗和门诊管理,但视力预后并未恶化。