• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习在感觉运动模态转换中的作用。

The role of learning in sensory-motor modality switching.

作者信息

Schaeffner Simone, Koch Iring, Philipp Andrea M

机构信息

RWTH Aachen University, Institute of Psychology, Jägerstrasse 17-19, 52056, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2018 Sep;82(5):955-969. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0872-8. Epub 2017 May 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-017-0872-8
PMID:28540479
Abstract

Previous research has indicated that modality switching is considerably affected by modality compatibility. It has been shown that switch costs are higher for switching between relatively incompatible sensory-motor modality mappings (i.e., auditory-manual and visual-vocal) compared to switching between compatible mappings (i.e., auditory-vocal and visual-manual). So far, however, it has been unclear whether these findings are influenced by learning processes resulting from very small stimulus sets and a large number of stimulus repetitions. In the present study, we investigated the role of learning concept-to-category associations (Experiment 1) as well as influences of learning concept-to-modality mappings (Experiment 2) on sensory-motor modality switching in semantic categorizations. The results of both experiments revealed shorter overall reaction times due to learning. Additionally, learning of concept-to-category associations (Experiment 1) led to a significant reduction of modality switch costs. Interestingly, however, modality-compatibility effects were neither significantly influenced by learning of concept-to-category associations nor by learning of concept-to-modality mappings. Thus, the present study provides first evidence that learning on the semantic level influences modality switching but it does not significantly affect modality compatibility.

摘要

先前的研究表明,模态转换受模态兼容性的影响很大。研究表明,与兼容映射(即听觉-发声和视觉-手动)之间的转换相比,相对不兼容的感觉运动模态映射(即听觉-手动和视觉-发声)之间的转换成本更高。然而,到目前为止,尚不清楚这些发现是否受到极小刺激集和大量刺激重复所导致的学习过程的影响。在本研究中,我们调查了学习概念到类别的关联(实验1)以及学习概念到模态的映射(实验2)在语义分类中对感觉运动模态转换的作用。两个实验的结果均显示,由于学习,总体反应时间缩短。此外,学习概念到类别的关联(实验1)导致模态转换成本显著降低。然而,有趣的是,模态兼容性效应既没有受到概念到类别的关联学习的显著影响,也没有受到概念到模态的映射学习的显著影响。因此,本研究首次证明,语义层面的学习会影响模态转换,但不会显著影响模态兼容性。

相似文献

1
The role of learning in sensory-motor modality switching.学习在感觉运动模态转换中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2018 Sep;82(5):955-969. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0872-8. Epub 2017 May 24.
2
Sensory-motor modality compatibility in multitasking: The influence of processing codes.多任务处理中的感觉运动模态兼容性:处理代码的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
3
Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands.任务转换中的模态兼容性取决于加工码和任务需求。
Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2346-2363. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01412-2. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.感觉运动模态兼容性在语言处理中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2016 Mar;80(2):212-23. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0661-1. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
5
Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.任务切换中模态映射的新特征:模态兼容性要求刺激模态和反应模态层面都具有变异性。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):121-133. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0875-5. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
6
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.在任务切换中区分刺激-反应兼容性和模态兼容性
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1546-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
7
Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching.模态兼容性偏倚任务转换中对反应模态的自愿选择。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):380-388. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1040-5. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.触觉刺激增强任务切换中模态兼容性的效应。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(4):276-84. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000291. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
9
The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.输入-输出模态兼容性在任务转换中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):491-8. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0353-4. Epub 2011 Aug 21.
10
The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.线索提示任务切换中跨通道注意准备与通道兼容性的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):955-965. doi: 10.1177/1747021818771836. Epub 2018 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Crossmodal Effects in Task Switching: Modality Compatibility with Vocal and Pedal Responses.任务切换中的跨通道效应:模态与语音和踏板反应的兼容性
J Cogn. 2021 Jan 21;4(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.129.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.感觉运动模态兼容性在语言处理中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2016 Mar;80(2):212-23. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0661-1. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
2
Effects of extensive dual-task practice on processing stages in simultaneous choice tasks.广泛的双重任务练习对同时选择任务中加工阶段的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):900-20. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0451-z.
3
The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.输入-输出模态兼容性在任务转换中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):491-8. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0353-4. Epub 2011 Aug 21.
4
Stimulus-response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation.刺激-反应绑定编码了刺激的抽象和具体表示:来自分类启动设计的证据表明,反应表示可以在多个层次上反转。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Nov;39(8):1457-71. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0118-8.
5
Task switching: effects of practice on switch and mixing costs.任务转换:练习对转换和混合成本的影响。
Psychol Res. 2012 Jan;76(1):74-83. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0323-x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
6
Control and interference in task switching--a review.任务转换的控制与干扰——综述。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):849-74. doi: 10.1037/a0019842.
7
Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.任务转换中的中央交叉对话:来自输入-输出模态兼容性操纵的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):1075-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019695.
8
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.用于接受和拒绝原假设的贝叶斯t检验。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225.
9
Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.任务切换中基于线索的准备和基于刺激的任务启动。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):433-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03193420.
10
The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.输入与输出模态配对在双重任务表现中的作用:内容依赖型中枢干扰的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2006 Jun;52(4):291-345. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.11.001. Epub 2006 Apr 11.