Suppr超能文献

连续血糖监测仪用于胰岛素给药的非辅助使用:是否安全?

Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?

作者信息

Shapiro Alan R

机构信息

1 Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):833-838. doi: 10.1177/1932296816688303. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

Abstract

With the increasing accuracy of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) have come calls for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to label these devices as safe for nonadjunctive dosing of insulin. However, there is evidence that these devices are subject to sporadic, unpredictable, large errors. A text analysis of reports to the FDA MAUDE database since 2015 reveals over 25 000 complaints of CGM sensor inaccuracy, with instances directly leading to serious outcomes. These new data were not considered at a recent FDA Advisory Panel meeting that voted to approve Dexcom G5 relabeling for nonadjunctive use. Social media is another source of surveillance data providing evidence of large CGM inaccuracies in real-world use. We need to improve safety procedures, not remove them. CGMs offer unique information and alerts for managing diabetes, but the issue is not whether they are better than other approaches to monitoring glucose, but how they can be best used in conjunction with devices that offer the confirmatory readings needed for patient safety.

摘要

随着连续血糖监测仪(CGM)准确性的提高,有人呼吁美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)将这些设备标记为可安全用于非辅助性胰岛素给药。然而,有证据表明这些设备会出现零星的、不可预测的重大误差。对自2015年以来向FDA不良事件报告数据库(MAUDE)提交的报告进行文本分析后发现,有超过25000起关于CGM传感器不准确的投诉,其中一些案例直接导致了严重后果。在FDA最近一次咨询小组会议上,这些新数据未被考虑,该会议投票批准了德康G5用于非辅助性使用的重新标签。社交媒体是另一个监测数据来源,提供了现实世界中CGM存在重大不准确的证据。我们需要改进安全程序,而不是取消它们。CGM为糖尿病管理提供了独特的信息和警报,但问题不在于它们是否比其他血糖监测方法更好,而在于如何将它们与能提供患者安全所需确认读数的设备结合起来,以实现最佳使用。

相似文献

1
Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):833-838. doi: 10.1177/1932296816688303. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Commentary Regarding Shapiro, "Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?".
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):839-841. doi: 10.1177/1932296817695341. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
Regulation Catches Up to Reality.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):160-164. doi: 10.1177/1932296816667749. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
4
Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Mar;17(3):177-86. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0272. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
5
The Safety of Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Still Not Resolved.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):856-857. doi: 10.1177/1932296817704446. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
7
Importance of FDA-Integrated Continuous Glucose Monitors to Ensure Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May 3:19322968241250357. doi: 10.1177/19322968241250357.
8
Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Diabetes Treatment Decisions.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1169-73. doi: 10.1177/1932296816631569. Print 2016 Sep.
10
Retrofitting Real-Life Dexcom G5 Data.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Apr;19(4):237-245. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0413. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

2
Assessing the Reproducibility of Research Based on the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Data.
J Patient Saf. 2024 Aug 1;20(5):e45-e58. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001220. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
Differences in Glucose Levels Between Arms Using Continuous Glucose Monitors.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Nov;16(6):1584-1585. doi: 10.1177/19322968221116390. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
6
Laboratory Protocol and Pilot Results for Dynamic Interference Testing of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):59-65. doi: 10.1177/19322968221095573. Epub 2022 May 13.
8
Differences in Glucose Readings Between Right Arm and Left Arm Using a Continuous Glucose Monitor.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1183-1189. doi: 10.1177/19322968211008838. Epub 2021 May 6.
9
Comparative Accuracy Analysis of a Real-time and an Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):287-293. doi: 10.1177/1932296819895022. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
10
Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Sep;13(5):890-898. doi: 10.1177/1932296819826965. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrochemical Glucose Sensing: Is There Still Room for Improvement?
Anal Chem. 2016 Dec 6;88(23):11271-11282. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03151. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
2
Regulation Catches Up to Reality.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):160-164. doi: 10.1177/1932296816667749. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
3
Interferences and Limitations in Blood Glucose Self-Testing: An Overview of the Current Knowledge.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1161-8. doi: 10.1177/1932296816641433. Print 2016 Sep.
4
Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 May 3;10(3):669-78. doi: 10.1177/1932296815612096. Print 2016 May.
5
Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review.
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:202-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
6
Medical device postapproval safety monitoring: where does the United States stand?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):124-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001460. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
7
Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Mar;9(2):209-14. doi: 10.1177/1932296814559746. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
8
The accuracy benefit of multiple amperometric glucose sensors in people with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):706-10. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1929. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验