Shapiro Alan R
1 Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):833-838. doi: 10.1177/1932296816688303. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
With the increasing accuracy of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) have come calls for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to label these devices as safe for nonadjunctive dosing of insulin. However, there is evidence that these devices are subject to sporadic, unpredictable, large errors. A text analysis of reports to the FDA MAUDE database since 2015 reveals over 25 000 complaints of CGM sensor inaccuracy, with instances directly leading to serious outcomes. These new data were not considered at a recent FDA Advisory Panel meeting that voted to approve Dexcom G5 relabeling for nonadjunctive use. Social media is another source of surveillance data providing evidence of large CGM inaccuracies in real-world use. We need to improve safety procedures, not remove them. CGMs offer unique information and alerts for managing diabetes, but the issue is not whether they are better than other approaches to monitoring glucose, but how they can be best used in conjunction with devices that offer the confirmatory readings needed for patient safety.
随着连续血糖监测仪(CGM)准确性的提高,有人呼吁美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)将这些设备标记为可安全用于非辅助性胰岛素给药。然而,有证据表明这些设备会出现零星的、不可预测的重大误差。对自2015年以来向FDA不良事件报告数据库(MAUDE)提交的报告进行文本分析后发现,有超过25000起关于CGM传感器不准确的投诉,其中一些案例直接导致了严重后果。在FDA最近一次咨询小组会议上,这些新数据未被考虑,该会议投票批准了德康G5用于非辅助性使用的重新标签。社交媒体是另一个监测数据来源,提供了现实世界中CGM存在重大不准确的证据。我们需要改进安全程序,而不是取消它们。CGM为糖尿病管理提供了独特的信息和警报,但问题不在于它们是否比其他血糖监测方法更好,而在于如何将它们与能提供患者安全所需确认读数的设备结合起来,以实现最佳使用。