• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?连续血糖监测仪用于胰岛素给药的非辅助使用:是否安全?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):833-838. doi: 10.1177/1932296816688303. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Commentary Regarding Shapiro, "Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?".关于夏皮罗的评论:“连续血糖监测仪在胰岛素给药中的非辅助使用:是否安全?”
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):839-841. doi: 10.1177/1932296817695341. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
Regulation Catches Up to Reality.监管跟上现实。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):160-164. doi: 10.1177/1932296816667749. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
4
Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.评估用于非辅助性连续血糖监测的传感器准确性。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Mar;17(3):177-86. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0272. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
5
The Safety of Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Still Not Resolved.持续葡萄糖监测仪非辅助用于胰岛素给药的安全性:仍未解决。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):856-857. doi: 10.1177/1932296817704446. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
6
FDA Approval of Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: A Potentially Risky Decision.美国食品药品监督管理局批准连续血糖监测仪用于胰岛素给药的非辅助使用:一个潜在有风险的决定。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1541-1542. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12075.
7
Importance of FDA-Integrated Continuous Glucose Monitors to Ensure Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.美国食品药品监督管理局整合式连续血糖监测仪对于确保连续血糖监测准确性的重要性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May 3:19322968241250357. doi: 10.1177/19322968241250357.
8
Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Diabetes Treatment Decisions.连续血糖监测在糖尿病治疗决策中的非辅助性应用
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1169-73. doi: 10.1177/1932296816631569. Print 2016 Sep.
9
Practical Considerations on the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pediatrics and Older Adults and Nonadjunctive Use.关于在儿科和老年人中使用持续葡萄糖监测及非辅助使用的实际考量
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(S3):S13-S20. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0034.
10
Retrofitting Real-Life Dexcom G5 Data.改造实际生活中的德康G5数据。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Apr;19(4):237-245. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0413. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Interference Testing-Unexpected Results Obtained with the Abbott Libre 2 and Dexcom G6 Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices.动态干扰测试——使用雅培瞬感2和德康G6连续血糖监测设备获得的意外结果
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 22;25(7):1985. doi: 10.3390/s25071985.
2
Assessing the Reproducibility of Research Based on the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Data.基于食品和药物管理局制造商和用户设施设备经验数据评估研究的可重复性。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Aug 1;20(5):e45-e58. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001220. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
Current Technologies for Managing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Their Impact on Quality of Life-A Narrative Review.1型糖尿病管理的当前技术及其对生活质量的影响——一项叙述性综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 30;13(8):1663. doi: 10.3390/life13081663.
4
Continuous Glucose Deviation Interval and Variability Analysis (CG-DIVA): A Novel Approach for the Statistical Accuracy Assessment of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems.连续血糖偏离间隔和变异性分析(CG-DIVA):一种用于连续血糖监测系统统计准确性评估的新方法。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):857-865. doi: 10.1177/19322968221134639. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Differences in Glucose Levels Between Arms Using Continuous Glucose Monitors.使用连续血糖监测仪时双臂血糖水平的差异。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Nov;16(6):1584-1585. doi: 10.1177/19322968221116390. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
6
Laboratory Protocol and Pilot Results for Dynamic Interference Testing of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors.连续血糖监测传感器动态干扰测试的实验室方案及初步结果
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):59-65. doi: 10.1177/19322968221095573. Epub 2022 May 13.
7
Analysis of "Multicenter Evaluation Study Comparing a New Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to Existing Flash Glucose Monitoring System".《多中心评价研究:比较新型工厂校准实时连续血糖监测系统与现有瞬态血糖监测系统》分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;17(1):214-216. doi: 10.1177/19322968211046026. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
8
Differences in Glucose Readings Between Right Arm and Left Arm Using a Continuous Glucose Monitor.使用连续血糖监测仪时右臂和左臂的血糖读数差异。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1183-1189. doi: 10.1177/19322968211008838. Epub 2021 May 6.
9
Comparative Accuracy Analysis of a Real-time and an Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.实时与间断扫描式连续血糖监测系统的准确性比较分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):287-293. doi: 10.1177/1932296819895022. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
10
Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.直接比较三种连续血糖监测系统的性能和可用性
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Sep;13(5):890-898. doi: 10.1177/1932296819826965. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrochemical Glucose Sensing: Is There Still Room for Improvement?电化学葡萄糖传感:是否仍有改进空间?
Anal Chem. 2016 Dec 6;88(23):11271-11282. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03151. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
2
Regulation Catches Up to Reality.监管跟上现实。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):160-164. doi: 10.1177/1932296816667749. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
3
Interferences and Limitations in Blood Glucose Self-Testing: An Overview of the Current Knowledge.血糖自我检测中的干扰因素与局限性:当前知识概述
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1161-8. doi: 10.1177/1932296816641433. Print 2016 Sep.
4
Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.葡萄糖传感中的冗余:用于连续葡萄糖监测的电化学冗余传感器的更高准确性和可靠性
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 May 3;10(3):669-78. doi: 10.1177/1932296815612096. Print 2016 May.
5
Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: A review.利用社交媒体数据进行药物警戒:综述
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:202-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
6
Medical device postapproval safety monitoring: where does the United States stand?医疗器械批准后安全监测:美国处于什么状况?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):124-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001460. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
7
Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm.具有先进算法的连续血糖监测系统的临床准确性
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Mar;9(2):209-14. doi: 10.1177/1932296814559746. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
8
The accuracy benefit of multiple amperometric glucose sensors in people with type 1 diabetes.多安培葡萄糖传感器在 1 型糖尿病患者中的准确性优势。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):706-10. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1929. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

连续血糖监测仪用于胰岛素给药的非辅助使用:是否安全?

Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?

作者信息

Shapiro Alan R

机构信息

1 Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):833-838. doi: 10.1177/1932296816688303. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1177/1932296816688303
PMID:28540756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5588827/
Abstract

With the increasing accuracy of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) have come calls for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to label these devices as safe for nonadjunctive dosing of insulin. However, there is evidence that these devices are subject to sporadic, unpredictable, large errors. A text analysis of reports to the FDA MAUDE database since 2015 reveals over 25 000 complaints of CGM sensor inaccuracy, with instances directly leading to serious outcomes. These new data were not considered at a recent FDA Advisory Panel meeting that voted to approve Dexcom G5 relabeling for nonadjunctive use. Social media is another source of surveillance data providing evidence of large CGM inaccuracies in real-world use. We need to improve safety procedures, not remove them. CGMs offer unique information and alerts for managing diabetes, but the issue is not whether they are better than other approaches to monitoring glucose, but how they can be best used in conjunction with devices that offer the confirmatory readings needed for patient safety.

摘要

随着连续血糖监测仪(CGM)准确性的提高,有人呼吁美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)将这些设备标记为可安全用于非辅助性胰岛素给药。然而,有证据表明这些设备会出现零星的、不可预测的重大误差。对自2015年以来向FDA不良事件报告数据库(MAUDE)提交的报告进行文本分析后发现,有超过25000起关于CGM传感器不准确的投诉,其中一些案例直接导致了严重后果。在FDA最近一次咨询小组会议上,这些新数据未被考虑,该会议投票批准了德康G5用于非辅助性使用的重新标签。社交媒体是另一个监测数据来源,提供了现实世界中CGM存在重大不准确的证据。我们需要改进安全程序,而不是取消它们。CGM为糖尿病管理提供了独特的信息和警报,但问题不在于它们是否比其他血糖监测方法更好,而在于如何将它们与能提供患者安全所需确认读数的设备结合起来,以实现最佳使用。