Suppr超能文献

丙酸氟替卡松及丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗多剂量干粉吸入器用于持续性哮喘的6个月安全性和有效性研究。

A 6-month safety and efficacy study of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol multidose dry powder inhalers in persistent asthma.

作者信息

Mansfield Lyndon, Yiu Gloria, Sakov Anat, Liu Siyu, Caracta Cynthia

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Proc. 2017 Jul 24;38(4):264-276. doi: 10.2500/aap.2017.38.4061. Epub 2017 May 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A novel multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) that is breath actuated, easy, and intuitive to use has been developed for administering fluticasone propionate (Fp) and Fp/salmeterol (FS).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of Fp MDPI versus Fp hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and FS MDPI versus FS dry-powder inhaler (DPI).

METHODS

This phase III, 26-week, open-label, active drug-controlled study enrolled subjects ≥12 years old with persistent asthma. Based on entry controller medication (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] or ICS/long-acting beta-agonist), the subjects were randomized to twice-daily mid-strength Fp MDPI 100 μg or Fp HFA 220 μg, high-strength Fp MDPI 200 μg or Fp HFA 440 μg, mid-strength FS MDPI 100/12.5 μg or FS DPI 250/50 μg, or high-strength FS MDPI 200/12.5 μg or FS DPI 500/50 μg in a 3:1 MDPI to Fp HFA or FS DPI ratio. Safety and efficacy were assessed by adverse events (AE) and pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 674 subjects were randomized. The AE incidence was similar across treatment groups (upper respiratory tract infections, sinusitis, and nasopharyngitis were most frequent). A higher percentage of subjects in the Fp HFA 440 μg and FS DPI 500/50 μg groups had oral candidiasis versus those who received Fp MDPI 200 μg or FS MDPI 200/12.5 μg, respectively. Serious AEs were similar between the treatments, with no unexpected findings. The incidence of asthma exacerbations was low and generally similar between the groups. Noninferiority was established for all Fp MDPI and FS MDPI doses compared with Fp HFA and FS DPI, respectively, for forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Changes in peak expiratory flow, rescue albuterol use, and symptoms were similar between treatments.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy profiles of Fp MDPI and FS MDPI administered at lower doses were generally comparable with those of Fp HFA and FS DPI, respectively, after 26 weeks of treatment.The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT02175771.

摘要

背景

已研发出一种新型多剂量干粉吸入器(MDPI),其通过呼吸驱动,使用方便且直观,用于吸入丙酸氟替卡松(Fp)和 Fp/沙美特罗(FS)。

目的

评估 Fp MDPI 与 Fp 氢氟烷烃(HFA)以及 FS MDPI 与 FS 干粉吸入器(DPI)的安全性和有效性。

方法

这项 III 期、为期 26 周的开放标签、活性药物对照研究纳入了年龄≥12 岁的持续性哮喘患者。根据入组时的控制药物(吸入性糖皮质激素[ICS]或 ICS/长效β受体激动剂),受试者被随机分为每日两次吸入中等强度 Fp MDPI 100 μg 或 Fp HFA 220 μg、高强度 Fp MDPI 200 μg 或 Fp HFA 440 μg、中等强度 FS MDPI 100/12.5 μg 或 FS DPI 250/50 μg、高强度 FS MDPI 200/12.5 μg 或 FS DPI 500/50 μg,MDPI 与 Fp HFA 或 FS DPI 的比例为 3:1。分别通过不良事件(AE)、肺功能和哮喘症状评估安全性和有效性。

结果

共有 674 名受试者被随机分组。各治疗组的 AE 发生率相似(上呼吸道感染、鼻窦炎和鼻咽炎最为常见)。与分别接受 Fp MDPI 200 μg 或 FS MDPI 200/12.5 μg 的受试者相比,Fp HFA 440 μg 组和 FS DPI 500/50 μg 组中发生口腔念珠菌病的受试者比例更高。治疗组之间的严重 AE 相似,未发现意外情况。哮喘急性加重的发生率较低,且各组之间总体相似。对于 1 秒用力呼气量,所有 Fp MDPI 和 FS MDPI 剂量与 Fp HFA 和 FS DPI 相比均确立了非劣效性。各治疗组之间的呼气峰值流速变化、沙丁胺醇急救使用情况和症状相似。

结论

治疗 26 周后,较低剂量的 Fp MDPI 和 FS MDPI 的安全性和有效性概况通常分别与 Fp HFA 和 FS DPI 相当。ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符为 NCT02175771。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验