Grützmann Rosa, Riesel Anja, Klawohn Julia, Heinzel Stephan, Kaufmann Christian, Bey Katharina, Lennertz Leonard, Wagner Michael, Kathmann Norbert
Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Bonn.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Aug;126(6):750-760. doi: 10.1037/abn0000283. Epub 2017 May 25.
Frontal electroencephalographic alpha asymmetry as an indicator of trait approach and trait inhibition systems has previously been studied in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) with mixed results. We explored frontal alpha asymmetry as a possible risk factor in OCD by investigating a large sample of OCD patients (n = 113), healthy control participants (n = 113), and unaffected 1st-degree relatives of OCD patients (n = 37). Additionally, the relationship between OCD symptom dimensions and frontal alpha asymmetry was explored. OCD patients and healthy control participants did not differ in alpha asymmetry scores. Hence, the current results do not support the notion that OCD as a diagnostic entity is associated with a shift in frontal cortical activity. Furthermore, alpha asymmetry scores were not statistically related to specific OCD symptom dimensions. Reasons for inconsistent results in OCD are discussed and should be explored in future studies. Compared to OCD patients and healthy control participants, unaffected 1st-degree relatives of OCD patients showed increased left frontal activity. Such asymmetry has previously been found to be associated with positive affect and adaptive emotion regulation under stress. Because stressful life events play an important role in the onset and exacerbation of OCD, increased left frontal activity might serve as a resilience factor in unaffected 1st-degree relatives. Future studies should follow up on these results with longitudinal risk studies and pre- and posttherapy assessments to further explore causality of this putative factor. (PsycINFO Database Record
作为特质趋近系统和特质抑制系统指标的额叶脑电图α波不对称性,此前在强迫症(OCD)患者中已有研究,但结果不一。我们通过调查大量强迫症患者样本(n = 113)、健康对照参与者(n = 113)以及强迫症患者未受影响的一级亲属(n = 37),探讨额叶α波不对称性作为强迫症潜在风险因素的可能性。此外,还探究了强迫症症状维度与额叶α波不对称性之间的关系。强迫症患者和健康对照参与者在α波不对称性得分上并无差异。因此,当前结果不支持将强迫症作为一种诊断实体与额叶皮质活动变化相关联的观点。此外,α波不对称性得分与特定的强迫症症状维度在统计学上并无关联。文中讨论了强迫症研究结果不一致的原因,未来研究应进一步探讨这些原因。与强迫症患者和健康对照参与者相比,强迫症患者未受影响的一级亲属表现出左额叶活动增加。此前发现这种不对称性与积极情绪以及压力下的适应性情绪调节有关。由于应激性生活事件在强迫症的发病和加重过程中起重要作用,左额叶活动增加可能是未受影响的一级亲属的一种复原力因素。未来研究应以纵向风险研究以及治疗前和治疗后评估对这些结果进行跟进,以进一步探究这一假定因素的因果关系。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )