Fang Huan, Liang Jingjuan, Hong Zhen, Sugiyama Kenji, Nozaki Takao, Kobayashi Susumu, Sameshima Tetsuro, Namba Hiroki, Asakawa Tetsuya
Department of Pharmacy, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178268. eCollection 2017.
The present study tested the clinical efficiency (item grouping, internal consistency of the subscales, construct validity, and clinical feasibility) of a widely used pain assessment system, the Mandarin version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-C), in Chinese patients. We also attempted to investigate the current quality of pain management provided in orthopedic inpatient units in China and provide baseline data. First, we investigated the test-retest reliability of APS-POQ-R-C. In total, 236 orthopedic patients were evaluated. Our results showed that APS-POQ-R-C has satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity, although some items are not appropriate for orthopedic patients. Test-retest reliability outcomes indicated that APS-POQ-R-C is a satisfactory battery with acceptable validity and reliability, and is therefore recommended for pain management in future studies.
本研究测试了一种广泛使用的疼痛评估系统——美国疼痛学会患者结果问卷中文版(APS-POQ-R-C)在中国患者中的临床有效性(项目分组、分量表的内部一致性、结构效度和临床可行性)。我们还试图调查中国骨科住院病房目前提供的疼痛管理质量,并提供基线数据。首先,我们调查了APS-POQ-R-C的重测信度。总共对236名骨科患者进行了评估。我们的结果表明,APS-POQ-R-C具有令人满意的内部一致性和结构效度,尽管有些项目不适用于骨科患者。重测信度结果表明,APS-POQ-R-C是一个令人满意的测评工具,具有可接受的效度和信度,因此建议在未来的研究中用于疼痛管理。