Suppr超能文献

针对中国骨科患者疼痛管理的修订版美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷中文版的心理测量学评估。

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients.

作者信息

Fang Huan, Liang Jingjuan, Hong Zhen, Sugiyama Kenji, Nozaki Takao, Kobayashi Susumu, Sameshima Tetsuro, Namba Hiroki, Asakawa Tetsuya

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178268. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The present study tested the clinical efficiency (item grouping, internal consistency of the subscales, construct validity, and clinical feasibility) of a widely used pain assessment system, the Mandarin version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-C), in Chinese patients. We also attempted to investigate the current quality of pain management provided in orthopedic inpatient units in China and provide baseline data. First, we investigated the test-retest reliability of APS-POQ-R-C. In total, 236 orthopedic patients were evaluated. Our results showed that APS-POQ-R-C has satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity, although some items are not appropriate for orthopedic patients. Test-retest reliability outcomes indicated that APS-POQ-R-C is a satisfactory battery with acceptable validity and reliability, and is therefore recommended for pain management in future studies.

摘要

本研究测试了一种广泛使用的疼痛评估系统——美国疼痛学会患者结果问卷中文版(APS-POQ-R-C)在中国患者中的临床有效性(项目分组、分量表的内部一致性、结构效度和临床可行性)。我们还试图调查中国骨科住院病房目前提供的疼痛管理质量,并提供基线数据。首先,我们调查了APS-POQ-R-C的重测信度。总共对236名骨科患者进行了评估。我们的结果表明,APS-POQ-R-C具有令人满意的内部一致性和结构效度,尽管有些项目不适用于骨科患者。重测信度结果表明,APS-POQ-R-C是一个令人满意的测评工具,具有可接受的效度和信度,因此建议在未来的研究中用于疼痛管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6270/5444797/b48f1583b40e/pone.0178268.g001.jpg

相似文献

5
Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).
J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):727-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 19.
10
Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 20-item Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (ChPASS-20).
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Jun;43(6):1131-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.021.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Individuals with dark eyes and hair exhibit higher pain sensitivity.
Somatosens Mot Res. 2017 Mar;34(1):21-26. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2016.1276439. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
2
Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).
J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):727-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 19.
6
Experience of barriers to pain management in patients receiving outpatient palliative care.
J Palliat Med. 2013 Aug;16(8):908-14. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0610. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
8
Why is management of cancer pain still a problem?
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1907-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.3146. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
9
Adverse effects associated with non-opioid and opioid treatment in patients with chronic pain.
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Feb 22;32 Suppl 1:53-63. doi: 10.2165/11630080-000000000-00000.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验