• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用验证性因子分析评估修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷在妇科术后患者中的结构效度。

Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, No 126 Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 15;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01229-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-020-01229-x
PMID:33451283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7809867/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) evaluates the patient-reported quality of pain management in adults. A validated APS-POQ-R is pivotal to guide effective pain management with better patient satisfaction. Previous studies revealed that subscales of "patients' perception of pain management" were unstable cross-culturally. This study aims to evaluate the construct validity of the APS-POQ-R in gynecological postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background using confirmatory factor analysis to allow comparisons among different a priori models at the latent factor level.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years old or above and who were scheduled for gynecology surgery were selected. Three different models with a combination of latent factors were based on a priori hypotheses from previous studies. The root-mean-squared error of approximation, comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis Index, Chi-squared test, and change in Chi-squared statistic given a change in degrees of freedom between models were used to assess the model fit to the present data.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients completed the questionnaire. The five-factor model which was based on Gordon's study has an acceptable fit for the data and was superior when compared to the one-factor baseline model. Although the four-factor model, which originated from Botti's study, also demonstrates a good model fit, the "perception of care" construct was excluded in this model. The "perception of care" construct is conceptually important as patient-centered care has become the focus of quality improvement of pain service.

CONCLUSIONS

The APS-POQ-R is easy to administer and is useful for quality evaluation in postoperative pain management. The present study demonstrates that a five-factor structure of the APS-POQ-R is the best fitting model in our patient sample. The results of this study provide further evidence to support the use of APS-POQ-R as a measurement tool for pain management evaluation in acute postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background.

摘要

背景

修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R)评估了成年人疼痛管理的患者报告质量。验证有效的 APS-POQ-R 对于指导有效的疼痛管理和提高患者满意度至关重要。先前的研究表明,“患者对疼痛管理的感知”亚量表在跨文化方面不稳定。本研究旨在使用验证性因子分析评估 APS-POQ-R 在具有多文化背景的妇科手术后患者中的结构效度,以允许在潜在因子水平上比较不同先验模型。

方法

选择年龄在 18 岁及以上且计划接受妇科手术的患者。根据先前研究的先验假设,三种不同的潜在因素组合模型被采用。使用近似均方根误差、比较拟合指数、塔克-刘易斯指数、卡方检验以及模型之间自由度变化引起的卡方检验统计量变化来评估模型对当前数据的拟合程度。

结果

共有 302 名患者完成了问卷。基于 Gordon 研究的五因素模型对数据具有可接受的拟合度,并且优于单因素基线模型。虽然源自 Botti 研究的四因素模型也表现出良好的模型拟合度,但该模型排除了“护理感知”结构。“护理感知”结构在概念上很重要,因为以患者为中心的护理已成为疼痛服务质量改进的焦点。

结论

APS-POQ-R 易于管理,可用于术后疼痛管理质量评估。本研究表明,在我们的患者样本中,APS-POQ-R 的五因素结构是最佳拟合模型。这项研究的结果为进一步支持使用 APS-POQ-R 作为具有多文化背景的急性术后患者疼痛管理评估的测量工具提供了证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/7f0a095705dd/12871_2020_1229_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/2444279ecdb9/12871_2020_1229_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/e87abc9ecafb/12871_2020_1229_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/f681e37df2b7/12871_2020_1229_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/4af6b8cfff05/12871_2020_1229_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/7f0a095705dd/12871_2020_1229_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/2444279ecdb9/12871_2020_1229_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/e87abc9ecafb/12871_2020_1229_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/f681e37df2b7/12871_2020_1229_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/4af6b8cfff05/12871_2020_1229_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfe/7809867/7f0a095705dd/12871_2020_1229_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis.采用验证性因子分析评估修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷在妇科术后患者中的结构效度。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 15;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01229-x.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.对丹麦版改良的美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R-D)用于急性腹痛住院患者的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0106.
3
Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).《美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷修订版》(APS-POQ-R)结构的跨文化研究。
J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):727-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 19.
4
Evaluation of the quality of acute pain management in a pediatric surgical setting: Validation of a parent proxy modified version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire.儿科手术环境中急性疼痛管理质量的评估:修订版美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷家长代理修改版的验证
Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Jan;29(1):68-76. doi: 10.1111/pan.13528. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
5
Evaluating patient outcomes in postoperative pain management according to the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).根据修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R)评估术后疼痛管理中的患者结局。
Appl Nurs Res. 2023 Oct;73:151734. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151734. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
6
The Norwegian version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire: reliability and validity of three subscales.美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷的挪威语版本:三个子量表的信度和效度
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(15):2070-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02142.x.
7
Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the emergency department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure.利用美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-RED)增强急诊科的疼痛护理:验证一种患者报告结局测量工具。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Mar 5;13(1):e002295. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002295.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of revised American Pain Society patient outcome questionnaire for surgical patients.修订版美国疼痛学会外科患者患者结局问卷土耳其语版本的跨文化适应性、效度和信度。
Agri. 2018 Apr;30(2):39-50. doi: 10.5505/agri.2018.21548.
9
Evaluating the quality of pain management in a hospital setting: testing the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the revised American Pain Society patient outcome questionnaire.评估医院环境中疼痛管理的质量:测试冰岛语版修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷的心理测量特性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):143-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
10
Comparison of Postoperative Pain Management Outcomes in the United States and China.中美术后疼痛管理结局比较。
Clin Nurs Res. 2021 Nov;30(8):1290-1300. doi: 10.1177/10547738211012832. Epub 2021 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of a disparity-reduction intervention on outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department: a clinical trial.急诊科减少差异干预对急性冠状动脉综合征患者结局的影响:一项临床试验。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 May 12;24(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02496-1.
2
Factors influencing surgical anxiety and postoperative pain: a comprehensive evaluation of psychological and gynecological determinants.影响手术焦虑和术后疼痛的因素:心理和妇科决定因素的综合评估
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03623-4.
3
Dexamethasone versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants in Ultrasound Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block for Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Putting Goal-Oriented Patient Care Into Practice.将以目标为导向的患者护理付诸实践。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1342-1344. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15885. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
2
Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention.术后疼痛控制不佳:患病率、后果及预防
J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066. eCollection 2017.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients.
地塞米松与右美托咪定作为辅助剂用于拇外翻手术的超声引导腘窝坐骨神经阻滞:单中心回顾性比较研究
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Apr 17;18:1231-1245. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S442808. eCollection 2024.
4
Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the emergency department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure.利用美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-RED)增强急诊科的疼痛护理:验证一种患者报告结局测量工具。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Mar 5;13(1):e002295. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002295.
5
Functional outcomes and quality of recovery after anaesthesia and surgery - Outreaching towards protracted goals.麻醉与手术后的功能结局及恢复质量——迈向长期目标
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 May;66(Suppl 3):S133-S136. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_356_22. Epub 2022 May 17.
针对中国骨科患者疼痛管理的修订版美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷中文版的心理测量学评估。
PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178268. eCollection 2017.
4
Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).《美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷修订版》(APS-POQ-R)结构的跨文化研究。
J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):727-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 19.
5
Patient participation in quality pain management during an acute care admission.患者在急性护理住院期间参与优质疼痛管理。
Clin J Pain. 2014 Apr;30(4):316-23. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318298ddc5.
6
Evaluating the quality of pain management in a hospital setting: testing the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the revised American Pain Society patient outcome questionnaire.评估医院环境中疼痛管理的质量:测试冰岛语版修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷的心理测量特性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):143-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
7
Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation.修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷 (APS-POQ-R) 用于改善住院成人的疼痛管理质量:初步心理测量评估。
J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1172-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
8
Sex-based differences in pain perception and treatment.基于性别的疼痛感知和治疗差异。
Pain Med. 2009 Mar;10(2):289-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00558.x. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
9
The Norwegian version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire: reliability and validity of three subscales.美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷的挪威语版本:三个子量表的信度和效度
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(15):2070-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02142.x.
10
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.