Odejide Oreofe O, Cronin Angel M, Earle Craig C, Tulsky James A, Abel Gregory A
Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Center for Lymphoma, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cancer. 2017 Sep 1;123(17):3377-3384. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30735. Epub 2017 May 22.
Although patients with blood cancers have significantly lower rates of hospice use than those with solid malignancies, data explaining this gap in end-of-life care are sparse.
In 2015, we conducted a mailed survey of a randomly selected sample of hematologic oncologists in the United States to characterize their perspectives regarding the utility and adequacy of hospice for blood cancer patients, as well as factors that might impact referral patterns. Simultaneous provision of care for patients with solid malignancies was permitted.
We received 349 surveys (response rate, 57.3%). The majority of respondents (68.1%) strongly agreed that hospice care is helpful for patients with hematologic cancers; those with practices including greater numbers of solid tumor patients (at least 25%) were more likely to strongly agree (odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-3.52). Despite high levels of support for hospice in general, 46.0% felt that home hospice is inadequate for their patients' needs (as compared to inpatient hospice with round-the-clock care). Although more than half of the respondents reported that they would be more likely to refer patients to hospice if red cell and/or platelet transfusions were available, those who considered home hospice inadequate were even more likely to report that they would (67.3% vs 55.3% for red cells [P = .03] and 52.9% vs 39.7% for platelets [P = .02]).
These data suggest that although hematologic oncologists value hospice, concerns about the adequacy of services for blood cancer patients limit hospice referrals. To increase hospice enrollment for blood cancer patients, interventions tailoring hospice services to their specific needs are warranted. Cancer 2017;123:3377-84. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
尽管血癌患者临终关怀的使用率显著低于实体恶性肿瘤患者,但解释这种临终关怀差距的数据却很稀少。
2015年,我们对美国随机抽取的血液肿瘤学家样本进行了邮寄调查,以了解他们对血癌患者临终关怀的效用和充分性的看法,以及可能影响转诊模式的因素。允许同时为实体恶性肿瘤患者提供护理。
我们收到了349份调查问卷(回复率为57.3%)。大多数受访者(68.1%)强烈同意临终关怀对血癌患者有帮助;那些诊治实体瘤患者数量较多(至少25%)的医生更有可能强烈同意(优势比为2.10;95%置信区间为1.26 - 3.52)。尽管总体上对临终关怀支持度较高,但46.0%的人认为居家临终关怀无法满足患者需求(与提供全天候护理的住院临终关怀相比)。虽然超过一半的受访者表示,如果有红细胞和/或血小板输血服务,他们更有可能将患者转诊至临终关怀机构,但那些认为居家临终关怀不足的人更有可能这样做(红细胞方面为67.3%对55.3%[P = 0.03],血小板方面为52.9%对39.7%[P = 0.02])。
这些数据表明,尽管血液肿瘤学家重视临终关怀,但对血癌患者服务充分性的担忧限制了临终关怀的转诊。为了增加血癌患者的临终关怀登记人数,有必要针对他们的特定需求调整临终关怀服务。《癌症》2017年;123:3377 - 84。©2017美国癌症协会。