Skåreby Ellen, Fürst Per, von Bahr Lena
Department of Internal Medicine, Kungälv Hospital, Sweden.
Research Department Palliative Care, Stockholm Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0312910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312910. eCollection 2025.
Patients with hematological malignancies are less likely to be referred to specialized palliative care, and more likely to receive aggressive end-of-life care than patient with solid tumors. The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) collects end-of-life care quality data from a majority of health facilities in Sweden. We here use the national data from the SRPC to evaluate the quality of end-of-life care in patients with hematological malignancies in Sweden.
In a retrospective, observational registry study all adult registered cancer deaths in the years 2011-2019 were included. For the main analysis, patients with unexpected deaths or co-morbidities were excluded. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression, adjusting for age and sex, were used.
A total of 119 927 patients were included, 8 550 with hematological malignancy (HM) and 111 377 with solid tumor (ST), corresponding to 43% of all deaths due to HM and 61% of ST deaths during the observed period. Significantly more ST patients than HM received end-of-life care in a specialized palliative unit (hospice, palliative ward or specialized home care), 54% vs 42% (p<0.001), and this difference could be seen also in the very old (80+). End-of-life care quality measures were significantly worse for HM patients than ST patients, which could partly be explained by the lower receipt of specialized palliative care. The most common symptom in both groups were pain, followed by anxiety. HM patients were less likely to achieve complete symptom relief (p<0.001) which appears to be related to the receipt of specialized palliative care.
Patients with hematological malignancies are more likely to die in emergency hospital and less likely to receive specialized palliative competence in end-of-life. This also translates into less qualitative end-of-life care and less efficient symptom relief.
血液系统恶性肿瘤患者被转介至专科姑息治疗的可能性较低,与实体瘤患者相比,他们在生命终末期接受积极治疗的可能性更高。瑞典姑息治疗登记处(SRPC)收集了瑞典大多数医疗机构的生命终末期护理质量数据。我们在此使用SRPC的全国数据来评估瑞典血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的生命终末期护理质量。
在一项回顾性观察性登记研究中,纳入了2011年至2019年期间所有成年登记癌症死亡病例。主要分析时,排除了意外死亡或有合并症的患者。使用了描述性统计和多因素逻辑回归,并对年龄和性别进行了调整。
共纳入119927例患者,其中8550例为血液系统恶性肿瘤(HM)患者,111377例为实体瘤(ST)患者,分别占观察期内所有HM死亡病例的43%和ST死亡病例的61%。接受专科姑息治疗单位(临终关怀机构、姑息治疗病房或专科家庭护理)生命终末期护理的ST患者显著多于HM患者,分别为54%和42%(p<0.001),在80岁及以上的高龄患者中也存在这种差异。HM患者的生命终末期护理质量指标显著差于ST患者,这部分可以通过专科姑息治疗接受率较低来解释。两组最常见的症状都是疼痛,其次是焦虑。HM患者实现完全症状缓解的可能性较小(p<0.001),这似乎与专科姑息治疗的接受情况有关。
血液系统恶性肿瘤患者更有可能在急诊医院死亡,在生命终末期接受专科姑息治疗能力的可能性较小。这也意味着生命终末期护理质量较低,症状缓解效果较差。