• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用动态纹理参数分析(DTPA)鉴别强化多发性硬化病变、胶质母细胞瘤和淋巴瘤:一项可行性研究。

Differentiating enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions, glioblastoma, and lymphoma with dynamic texture parameters analysis (DTPA): A feasibility study.

机构信息

Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, 3010, Switzerland.

Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Tiefenau Hospital, Bern, 3004, Switzerland.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):4000-4008. doi: 10.1002/mp.12356. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1002/mp.12356
PMID:28543071
Abstract

PURPOSE

MR-imaging hallmarks of glioblastoma (GB), cerebral lymphoma (CL), and demyelinating lesions are gadolinium (Gd) uptake due to blood-brain barrier disruption. Thus, initial diagnosis may be difficult based on conventional Gd-enhanced MRI alone. Here, the added value of a dynamic texture parameter analysis (DTPA) in the differentiation between these three entities is examined. DTPA is an in-house software tool that incorporates the analysis of quantitative texture parameters extracted from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSCE) images.

METHODS

Twelve patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), 15 patients with GB, and five patients with CL were included. The image analysis method focuses on the DSCE image time series during bolus passage. Three time intervals were examined: inflow, outflow, and reperfusion time interval. Texture maps were computed. From the DSCE image series, mean, difference, standard deviation, and variance texture parameters were calculated and statistically analyzed and compared between the pathologies.

RESULTS

The texture parameters of the original DSCE image series for mean, standard deviation, and variance showed the most significant differences (P-value between <0.00 and 0.05) between pathologies. Further, the texture parameters related to the standard deviation or variance (both associated with tissue heterogeneity) revealed the strongest discriminations between the pathologies.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that dynamic perfusion texture parameters as assessed by the DTPA method allow discriminating MS, GB, and CL lesions during the first passage of contrast. DTPA used in combination with classification algorithms has the potential to find the most likely diagnosis given a postulated differential diagnosis.

摘要

目的

磁共振成像(MRI)中脑胶质母细胞瘤(GB)、脑淋巴瘤(CL)和脱髓鞘病变的特征是血脑屏障破坏导致钆(Gd)摄取。因此,仅基于常规 Gd 增强 MRI 进行初始诊断可能具有挑战性。在此,检查了动态纹理参数分析(DTPA)在这三种病变之间区分的附加值。DTPA 是一种内部软件工具,它包含从动态磁敏感对比增强(DSCE)图像中提取的定量纹理参数的分析。

方法

纳入 12 例多发性硬化症(MS)患者、15 例 GB 患者和 5 例 CL 患者。该图像分析方法主要关注于在推注过程中的 DSCE 图像时间序列。检查了三个时间间隔:流入、流出和再灌注时间间隔。计算纹理图谱。从 DSCE 图像序列中计算并统计分析均值、差异、标准差和方差纹理参数,并在病变之间进行比较。

结果

原始 DSCE 图像系列的纹理参数(均值、标准差和方差)在病变之间表现出最显著的差异(P 值介于<0.00 至 0.05 之间)。此外,与标准差或方差相关的纹理参数(均与组织异质性相关)在病变之间显示出最强的区分。

结论

我们得出结论,DTPA 方法评估的动态灌注纹理参数可在对比剂首次通过期间区分 MS、GB 和 CL 病变。DTPA 与分类算法结合使用,有可能在给定假设的鉴别诊断后找到最可能的诊断。

相似文献

1
Differentiating enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions, glioblastoma, and lymphoma with dynamic texture parameters analysis (DTPA): A feasibility study.利用动态纹理参数分析(DTPA)鉴别强化多发性硬化病变、胶质母细胞瘤和淋巴瘤:一项可行性研究。
Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):4000-4008. doi: 10.1002/mp.12356. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
2
Characterization of Enhancing MS Lesions by Dynamic Texture Parameter Analysis of Dynamic Susceptibility Perfusion Imaging.通过动态磁敏感灌注成像的动态纹理参数分析对强化型多发性硬化病变进行特征描述
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9578139. doi: 10.1155/2016/9578139. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
3
Characterization of microcirculation in multiple sclerosis lesions by dynamic texture parameter analysis (DTPA).通过动态纹理参数分析(DTPA)对多发性硬化病变中的微循环进行特征描述。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 16;8(7):e67610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067610. Print 2013.
4
Usefulness of Histogram-Profile Analysis in Ring-Enhancing Intracranial Lesions.直方图-轮廓分析在环形强化颅内病变中的应用。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e226-e236. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.123. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
Differential Diagnostic Value of Texture Feature Analysis of Magnetic Resonance T2 Weighted Imaging between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Neural System Lymphoma.磁共振T2加权成像纹理特征分析在胶质母细胞瘤与原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤之间的鉴别诊断价值
Chin Med Sci J. 2019 Mar 30;34(1):10-17. doi: 10.24920/003548.
6
The value of texture analysis in peritumoral edema of differentiating diagnosis between glioblastoma and primary brain lymphoma.纹理分析在胶质母细胞瘤与原发性脑淋巴瘤瘤周水肿鉴别诊断中的价值
Br J Neurosurg. 2023 Oct;37(5):1074-1077. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1856783. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
7
Intra-individual comparison of different gadolinium-based contrast agents in the quantitative evaluation of C6 glioma with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.动态对比增强磁共振成像定量评估 C6 胶质瘤中不同钆基对比剂的个体内比较。
Sci China Life Sci. 2017 Jan;60(1):11-15. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-0386-2. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
8
Machine Learning-based Texture Analysis of Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging to Differentiate between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.基于机器学习的对比增强磁共振成像纹理分析鉴别胶质母细胞瘤和原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019 Jan 10;18(1):44-52. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2017-0178. Epub 2018 May 16.
9
Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain using gadolinium-DTPA.使用钆喷酸葡胺进行脑部对比增强磁共振成像。
Acta Radiol. 1987 Nov-Dec;28(6):659-65.
10
Utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating glioblastoma, primary central nervous system lymphoma and brain metastatic tumor.动态对比增强磁共振成像在鉴别胶质母细胞瘤、原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤和脑转移瘤中的应用价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Oct;85(10):1722-1727. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing classification of active and non-active lesions in multiple sclerosis: machine learning models and feature selection techniques.增强多发性硬化症中活动性和非活动性病变的分类:机器学习模型与特征选择技术
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01528-6.
2
Uses of artificial intelligence in glioma: A systematic review.人工智能在胶质瘤中的应用:一项系统综述。
Med Int (Lond). 2024 May 20;4(4):40. doi: 10.3892/mi.2024.164. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
3
Radiomics: The New Promise for Differentiating Progression, Recurrence, Pseudoprogression, and Radionecrosis in Glioma and Glioblastoma Multiforme.
放射组学:鉴别胶质瘤和多形性胶质母细胞瘤进展、复发、假性进展及放射性坏死的新希望
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 5;15(18):4429. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184429.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Brain Tumor Imaging: A Step toward Personalized Medicine.人工智能在脑肿瘤成像中的应用:迈向个性化医疗的一步。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 22;30(3):2673-2701. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030203.
5
Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and radiomics in neuro-oncology imaging.人工智能与放射组学在神经肿瘤成像中的临床应用
Insights Imaging. 2021 Oct 21;12(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01102-6.
6
Discrimination between pituitary adenoma and craniopharyngioma using MRI-based image features and texture features.基于 MRI 的图像特征和纹理特征鉴别垂体腺瘤和颅咽管瘤。
Jpn J Radiol. 2020 Dec;38(12):1125-1134. doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-01021-4. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
7
Texture Analysis in Cerebral Gliomas: A Review of the Literature.脑胶质瘤的纹理分析:文献综述。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jun;40(6):928-934. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6075. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
Magnetic resonance texture analysis utility in differentiating intraparenchymal neurosarcoidosis from primary central nervous system lymphoma: a preliminary analysis.磁共振纹理分析在鉴别脑实质内结节病与原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤中的应用:一项初步分析
Neuroradiol J. 2019 Jun;32(3):203-209. doi: 10.1177/1971400919830173. Epub 2019 Feb 21.