Department of Neurology, University of Michigan; Neurology Service & Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; and, University of Michigan Morris K. Udall Center of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Department of Neurology, University of Michigan; and Neurology Service & Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ann Neurol. 2017 Jul;82(1):4-19. doi: 10.1002/ana.24961. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
We attempt to correlate the clinical pharmacology of dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) in Parkinson Disease with known features of striatal dopamine actions. Despite its obvious impact, DRT does not normalize motor function, likely due to disrupted phasic dopaminergic signaling. The DRT Short Duration Response is likely a permissive-paracrine effect, possibly resulting from dopaminergic support of corticostriate synaptic plasticity. The DRT Long Duration Response may result from mimicry of tonic dopamine signaling regulation of movement vigor. Our understanding of dopamine actions does not explain important aspects of DRT clinical pharmacology. Reducing these knowledge gaps provides opportunities to improve understanding of dopamine actions and symptomatic treatment of Parkinson disease.
我们试图将帕金森病中多巴胺替代疗法(DRT)的临床药理学与纹状体多巴胺作用的已知特征联系起来。尽管 DRT 具有明显的影响,但它不能使运动功能正常化,这可能是由于相位性多巴胺能信号的中断。DRT 短持续时间反应可能是一种许可旁分泌效应,可能是由于多巴胺能对皮质纹状体突触可塑性的支持。DRT 长持续时间反应可能是由于模拟紧张性多巴胺信号调节运动活力。我们对多巴胺作用的理解并不能解释 DRT 临床药理学的重要方面。减少这些知识差距为深入了解多巴胺作用和帕金森病的症状治疗提供了机会。